Question Description
Principle: No offence is committed by a person who, during that act, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, whether it is wrong or contrary to law; provided that the thing that intoxicated him was administered without his knowledge or against his will.Facts: Kamath consumed an entire bottle of brandy than his usual drink of vodka. On the way back to his hostel, he tried to strangle his friend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act in a state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware that brandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandy voluntarily and was fully aware of the consequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consume his customary drink and committed the act under the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: No offence is committed by a person who, during that act, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, whether it is wrong or contrary to law; provided that the thing that intoxicated him was administered without his knowledge or against his will.Facts: Kamath consumed an entire bottle of brandy than his usual drink of vodka. On the way back to his hostel, he tried to strangle his friend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act in a state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware that brandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandy voluntarily and was fully aware of the consequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consume his customary drink and committed the act under the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: No offence is committed by a person who, during that act, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, whether it is wrong or contrary to law; provided that the thing that intoxicated him was administered without his knowledge or against his will.Facts: Kamath consumed an entire bottle of brandy than his usual drink of vodka. On the way back to his hostel, he tried to strangle his friend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act in a state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware that brandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandy voluntarily and was fully aware of the consequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consume his customary drink and committed the act under the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle: No offence is committed by a person who, during that act, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, whether it is wrong or contrary to law; provided that the thing that intoxicated him was administered without his knowledge or against his will.Facts: Kamath consumed an entire bottle of brandy than his usual drink of vodka. On the way back to his hostel, he tried to strangle his friend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act in a state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware that brandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandy voluntarily and was fully aware of the consequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consume his customary drink and committed the act under the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle: No offence is committed by a person who, during that act, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, whether it is wrong or contrary to law; provided that the thing that intoxicated him was administered without his knowledge or against his will.Facts: Kamath consumed an entire bottle of brandy than his usual drink of vodka. On the way back to his hostel, he tried to strangle his friend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act in a state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware that brandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandy voluntarily and was fully aware of the consequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consume his customary drink and committed the act under the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principle: No offence is committed by a person who, during that act, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, whether it is wrong or contrary to law; provided that the thing that intoxicated him was administered without his knowledge or against his will.Facts: Kamath consumed an entire bottle of brandy than his usual drink of vodka. On the way back to his hostel, he tried to strangle his friend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act in a state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware that brandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandy voluntarily and was fully aware of the consequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consume his customary drink and committed the act under the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: No offence is committed by a person who, during that act, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, whether it is wrong or contrary to law; provided that the thing that intoxicated him was administered without his knowledge or against his will.Facts: Kamath consumed an entire bottle of brandy than his usual drink of vodka. On the way back to his hostel, he tried to strangle his friend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act in a state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware that brandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandy voluntarily and was fully aware of the consequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consume his customary drink and committed the act under the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: No offence is committed by a person who, during that act, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, whether it is wrong or contrary to law; provided that the thing that intoxicated him was administered without his knowledge or against his will.Facts: Kamath consumed an entire bottle of brandy than his usual drink of vodka. On the way back to his hostel, he tried to strangle his friend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act in a state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware that brandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandy voluntarily and was fully aware of the consequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consume his customary drink and committed the act under the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principle: No offence is committed by a person who, during that act, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, whether it is wrong or contrary to law; provided that the thing that intoxicated him was administered without his knowledge or against his will.Facts: Kamath consumed an entire bottle of brandy than his usual drink of vodka. On the way back to his hostel, he tried to strangle his friend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act in a state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware that brandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandy voluntarily and was fully aware of the consequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consume his customary drink and committed the act under the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.