Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a andquot;forestandquot;, mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following, if true, would undermine the argument that Saranda has lost several plant and animal species due to indiscriminate mining?a)A recent investigation found several gross violations in Saranda due to increased mining at the cost of severe ecological impact.b)Saranda forests are a huge catchment for rivers and streams in the region.c)Mass scale deforestation taking place in Saranda can be traced to lightning strikes.d)The rich Saranda forests are rich in biodiversity and provide minor forest produce to local tribals.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Read the context and answer the following que...

Read the context and answer the following question.

The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve India's stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhand's Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are India's largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.

Q. Which of the following, if true, would undermine the argument that Saranda has lost several plant and animal species due to indiscriminate mining?

a)
A recent investigation found several gross violations in Saranda due to increased mining at the cost of severe ecological impact.
b)
Saranda forests are a huge catchment for rivers and streams in the region.
c)
Mass scale deforestation taking place in Saranda can be traced to lightning strikes.
d)
The rich Saranda forests are rich in biodiversity and provide minor forest produce to local tribals.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry ...

The statement would be undermined by option 3 as it states an alternative reason for the loss of several plant and animal species. It shifts the blame from indiscriminate mining to lightning strikes, providing an alternate explanation for the forest destruction and thereby undermining the argument.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (h

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (h

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (h

View answer

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.It has been repeatedly held that the PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act) is a sui generis legislation, enacted to tackle money laundering through white-collar crimes. According to Section 3 of the PMLA, the act of projecting or claiming proceeds of crime to be untainted property constitutes the offense of money laundering. Under the Schedule to the PMLA, a number of offenses under the Indian Penal Code and other special statutes have been included, which serve as the basis for the offense of money laundering. In other words, the existence of predicate offense is sine qua non to charge someone with money laundering. It is crucial to note that the investigation and prosecution of the predicate offense are done typically by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or the State Police.Section 50 of the PMLA provides powers of a civil court to the ED authorities for summoning persons suspected of money laundering and recording statements. However, the Supreme Court held that ED authorities are not police officers. It observed in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India (2022) that “the process envisaged by Section 50 of the PMLA is in the nature of an inquiry against the proceeds of crime and is not ‘investigation’ in strict sense of the term for initiating prosecution.” There are other dissimilarities between ED authorities and the police. While the police are required to register a First Information Report (FIR) for a cognizable offense before conducting an investigation, ED authorities begin with search procedures and undertake their investigation for the purpose of gathering materials and tracing the ‘proceeds of crime’ by issuing summons. Any statement made by an accused to the police is inadmissible as evidence in court, whereas a statement made to an ED authority is admissible. A copy of the FIR is accessible to the accused, whereas the Enforcement Case Information Report is seldom available.While the police investigating the predicate offense are empowered to arrest and seek custody of the accused, the ED is meant to focus on recovering the proceeds of crime in order to redistribute the same to victims. It is not clear whether the ED has managed to do this. Per contra, the Proceeds of Crime Act, 2002, the analogous legislation in the U.K., almost entirely concentrates on the confiscation of assets through dedicated civil proceedings. Unfortunately, of late, much of the ED’s powers have been discharged in effecting pretrial arrests, which used to be the prerogative of the police investigating the predicate offence. In the past, the CBI was used to impart fear among political opponents. In the process, the agency received the condemnation of various courts and earned the nickname “caged parrot”. Whether the ED will go down the same path or reorient its approach will entirely depend on the intervention of the country’s constitutional courts.Q.Which of the following is not the appropriate cause-and-effect relationship in the passages context?

View answer

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.It has been repeatedly held that the PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act) is a sui generis legislation, enacted to tackle money laundering through white-collar crimes. According to Section 3 of the PMLA, the act of projecting or claiming proceeds of crime to be untainted property constitutes the offense of money laundering. Under the Schedule to the PMLA, a number of offenses under the Indian Penal Code and other special statutes have been included, which serve as the basis for the offense of money laundering. In other words, the existence of predicate offense is sine qua non to charge someone with money laundering. It is crucial to note that the investigation and prosecution of the predicate offense are done typically by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or the State Police.Section 50 of the PMLA provides powers of a civil court to the ED authorities for summoning persons suspected of money laundering and recording statements. However, the Supreme Court held that ED authorities are not police officers. It observed in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India (2022) that “the process envisaged by Section 50 of the PMLA is in the nature of an inquiry against the proceeds of crime and is not ‘investigation’ in strict sense of the term for initiating prosecution.” There are other dissimilarities between ED authorities and the police. While the police are required to register a First Information Report (FIR) for a cognizable offense before conducting an investigation, ED authorities begin with search procedures and undertake their investigation for the purpose of gathering materials and tracing the ‘proceeds of crime’ by issuing summons. Any statement made by an accused to the police is inadmissible as evidence in court, whereas a statement made to an ED authority is admissible. A copy of the FIR is accessible to the accused, whereas the Enforcement Case Information Report is seldom available.While the police investigating the predicate offense are empowered to arrest and seek custody of the accused, the ED is meant to focus on recovering the proceeds of crime in order to redistribute the same to victims. It is not clear whether the ED has managed to do this. Per contra, the Proceeds of Crime Act, 2002, the analogous legislation in the U.K., almost entirely concentrates on the confiscation of assets through dedicated civil proceedings. Unfortunately, of late, much of the ED’s powers have been discharged in effecting pretrial arrests, which used to be the prerogative of the police investigating the predicate offence. In the past, the CBI was used to impart fear among political opponents. In the process, the agency received the condemnation of various courts and earned the nickname “caged parrot”. Whether the ED will go down the same path or reorient its approach will entirely depend on the intervention of the country’s constitutional courts.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is NOT a key difference between ED authorities and the police in their approach to investigations?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following, if true, would undermine the argument that Saranda has lost several plant and animal species due to indiscriminate mining?a)A recent investigation found several gross violations in Saranda due to increased mining at the cost of severe ecological impact.b)Saranda forests are a huge catchment for rivers and streams in the region.c)Mass scale deforestation taking place in Saranda can be traced to lightning strikes.d)The rich Saranda forests are rich in biodiversity and provide minor forest produce to local tribals.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following, if true, would undermine the argument that Saranda has lost several plant and animal species due to indiscriminate mining?a)A recent investigation found several gross violations in Saranda due to increased mining at the cost of severe ecological impact.b)Saranda forests are a huge catchment for rivers and streams in the region.c)Mass scale deforestation taking place in Saranda can be traced to lightning strikes.d)The rich Saranda forests are rich in biodiversity and provide minor forest produce to local tribals.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following, if true, would undermine the argument that Saranda has lost several plant and animal species due to indiscriminate mining?a)A recent investigation found several gross violations in Saranda due to increased mining at the cost of severe ecological impact.b)Saranda forests are a huge catchment for rivers and streams in the region.c)Mass scale deforestation taking place in Saranda can be traced to lightning strikes.d)The rich Saranda forests are rich in biodiversity and provide minor forest produce to local tribals.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following, if true, would undermine the argument that Saranda has lost several plant and animal species due to indiscriminate mining?a)A recent investigation found several gross violations in Saranda due to increased mining at the cost of severe ecological impact.b)Saranda forests are a huge catchment for rivers and streams in the region.c)Mass scale deforestation taking place in Saranda can be traced to lightning strikes.d)The rich Saranda forests are rich in biodiversity and provide minor forest produce to local tribals.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following, if true, would undermine the argument that Saranda has lost several plant and animal species due to indiscriminate mining?a)A recent investigation found several gross violations in Saranda due to increased mining at the cost of severe ecological impact.b)Saranda forests are a huge catchment for rivers and streams in the region.c)Mass scale deforestation taking place in Saranda can be traced to lightning strikes.d)The rich Saranda forests are rich in biodiversity and provide minor forest produce to local tribals.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following, if true, would undermine the argument that Saranda has lost several plant and animal species due to indiscriminate mining?a)A recent investigation found several gross violations in Saranda due to increased mining at the cost of severe ecological impact.b)Saranda forests are a huge catchment for rivers and streams in the region.c)Mass scale deforestation taking place in Saranda can be traced to lightning strikes.d)The rich Saranda forests are rich in biodiversity and provide minor forest produce to local tribals.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following, if true, would undermine the argument that Saranda has lost several plant and animal species due to indiscriminate mining?a)A recent investigation found several gross violations in Saranda due to increased mining at the cost of severe ecological impact.b)Saranda forests are a huge catchment for rivers and streams in the region.c)Mass scale deforestation taking place in Saranda can be traced to lightning strikes.d)The rich Saranda forests are rich in biodiversity and provide minor forest produce to local tribals.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following, if true, would undermine the argument that Saranda has lost several plant and animal species due to indiscriminate mining?a)A recent investigation found several gross violations in Saranda due to increased mining at the cost of severe ecological impact.b)Saranda forests are a huge catchment for rivers and streams in the region.c)Mass scale deforestation taking place in Saranda can be traced to lightning strikes.d)The rich Saranda forests are rich in biodiversity and provide minor forest produce to local tribals.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following, if true, would undermine the argument that Saranda has lost several plant and animal species due to indiscriminate mining?a)A recent investigation found several gross violations in Saranda due to increased mining at the cost of severe ecological impact.b)Saranda forests are a huge catchment for rivers and streams in the region.c)Mass scale deforestation taking place in Saranda can be traced to lightning strikes.d)The rich Saranda forests are rich in biodiversity and provide minor forest produce to local tribals.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following, if true, would undermine the argument that Saranda has lost several plant and animal species due to indiscriminate mining?a)A recent investigation found several gross violations in Saranda due to increased mining at the cost of severe ecological impact.b)Saranda forests are a huge catchment for rivers and streams in the region.c)Mass scale deforestation taking place in Saranda can be traced to lightning strikes.d)The rich Saranda forests are rich in biodiversity and provide minor forest produce to local tribals.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam