Question Description
Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The term state, under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, 1950, specifies that all the authorities which are functioning within or outside the territory of India will be considered to be the state under Part III of the Constitution. This definition is not exhaustive but inclusive. The authorities which are included in Article 12 are: The government and Parliament of India, the state government and the legislature of each state, all local authorities (municipalities, District Boards, Panchayats, Improvement Trust, Mining Settlement Boards, etc.) and other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.Apart from the central, state and local authorities, the authority or institutions which exercise governmental or sovereign powers or functions can be counted under other authorities.For the purpose of wider application of fundamental rights, state must be defined liberally, but not for other purposes. Therefore, an employee of the public corporation may challenge the violation of his fundamental by the corporation, but for that reason he does not become a state employee and cannot seek the protection.Article 13 of the Constitution speaks about laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights. This Article states that all laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void and that the state shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void. In this Article, unless the context otherwise requires, law includes any ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law; laws in force include laws passed or made by legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas. Last but not the least nothing in this Article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368.Unlike the other legal rights which are created by the state that confers the right upon the individuals against one another, however the fundamental rights can be claimed only against the state. Therefore, it is generally assumed that fundamental rights are available only against the state which includes the actions of the state and against the officials of the state. Property right is a recognised right under Article 300A of the Constitution.The provisions of the Constitution pertaining to fundamental rights have no retrospective effect. The word retrospective means intending to take effect from the past date. All the existing laws which are inconsistent, they will be void after the commencement of the Constitution.Q.The state of Kerala made a law stating that no individual can own more than 20 acres of land in his own name. One saint named Keshav challenged it stating that it is violative of Part III of the Constitution and breaches his fundamental rights. Decide.a)Keshav is entitled to own property more than 20 acres.b)The law made by Kerala state is violative of Part III.c)The law made by Kerala state is not violative of Part III.d)Keshav cannot claim fundamental right as he is a saint who has renounced all his rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The term state, under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, 1950, specifies that all the authorities which are functioning within or outside the territory of India will be considered to be the state under Part III of the Constitution. This definition is not exhaustive but inclusive. The authorities which are included in Article 12 are: The government and Parliament of India, the state government and the legislature of each state, all local authorities (municipalities, District Boards, Panchayats, Improvement Trust, Mining Settlement Boards, etc.) and other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.Apart from the central, state and local authorities, the authority or institutions which exercise governmental or sovereign powers or functions can be counted under other authorities.For the purpose of wider application of fundamental rights, state must be defined liberally, but not for other purposes. Therefore, an employee of the public corporation may challenge the violation of his fundamental by the corporation, but for that reason he does not become a state employee and cannot seek the protection.Article 13 of the Constitution speaks about laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights. This Article states that all laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void and that the state shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void. In this Article, unless the context otherwise requires, law includes any ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law; laws in force include laws passed or made by legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas. Last but not the least nothing in this Article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368.Unlike the other legal rights which are created by the state that confers the right upon the individuals against one another, however the fundamental rights can be claimed only against the state. Therefore, it is generally assumed that fundamental rights are available only against the state which includes the actions of the state and against the officials of the state. Property right is a recognised right under Article 300A of the Constitution.The provisions of the Constitution pertaining to fundamental rights have no retrospective effect. The word retrospective means intending to take effect from the past date. All the existing laws which are inconsistent, they will be void after the commencement of the Constitution.Q.The state of Kerala made a law stating that no individual can own more than 20 acres of land in his own name. One saint named Keshav challenged it stating that it is violative of Part III of the Constitution and breaches his fundamental rights. Decide.a)Keshav is entitled to own property more than 20 acres.b)The law made by Kerala state is violative of Part III.c)The law made by Kerala state is not violative of Part III.d)Keshav cannot claim fundamental right as he is a saint who has renounced all his rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The term state, under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, 1950, specifies that all the authorities which are functioning within or outside the territory of India will be considered to be the state under Part III of the Constitution. This definition is not exhaustive but inclusive. The authorities which are included in Article 12 are: The government and Parliament of India, the state government and the legislature of each state, all local authorities (municipalities, District Boards, Panchayats, Improvement Trust, Mining Settlement Boards, etc.) and other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.Apart from the central, state and local authorities, the authority or institutions which exercise governmental or sovereign powers or functions can be counted under other authorities.For the purpose of wider application of fundamental rights, state must be defined liberally, but not for other purposes. Therefore, an employee of the public corporation may challenge the violation of his fundamental by the corporation, but for that reason he does not become a state employee and cannot seek the protection.Article 13 of the Constitution speaks about laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights. This Article states that all laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void and that the state shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void. In this Article, unless the context otherwise requires, law includes any ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law; laws in force include laws passed or made by legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas. Last but not the least nothing in this Article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368.Unlike the other legal rights which are created by the state that confers the right upon the individuals against one another, however the fundamental rights can be claimed only against the state. Therefore, it is generally assumed that fundamental rights are available only against the state which includes the actions of the state and against the officials of the state. Property right is a recognised right under Article 300A of the Constitution.The provisions of the Constitution pertaining to fundamental rights have no retrospective effect. The word retrospective means intending to take effect from the past date. All the existing laws which are inconsistent, they will be void after the commencement of the Constitution.Q.The state of Kerala made a law stating that no individual can own more than 20 acres of land in his own name. One saint named Keshav challenged it stating that it is violative of Part III of the Constitution and breaches his fundamental rights. Decide.a)Keshav is entitled to own property more than 20 acres.b)The law made by Kerala state is violative of Part III.c)The law made by Kerala state is not violative of Part III.d)Keshav cannot claim fundamental right as he is a saint who has renounced all his rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The term state, under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, 1950, specifies that all the authorities which are functioning within or outside the territory of India will be considered to be the state under Part III of the Constitution. This definition is not exhaustive but inclusive. The authorities which are included in Article 12 are: The government and Parliament of India, the state government and the legislature of each state, all local authorities (municipalities, District Boards, Panchayats, Improvement Trust, Mining Settlement Boards, etc.) and other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.Apart from the central, state and local authorities, the authority or institutions which exercise governmental or sovereign powers or functions can be counted under other authorities.For the purpose of wider application of fundamental rights, state must be defined liberally, but not for other purposes. Therefore, an employee of the public corporation may challenge the violation of his fundamental by the corporation, but for that reason he does not become a state employee and cannot seek the protection.Article 13 of the Constitution speaks about laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights. This Article states that all laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void and that the state shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void. In this Article, unless the context otherwise requires, law includes any ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law; laws in force include laws passed or made by legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas. Last but not the least nothing in this Article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368.Unlike the other legal rights which are created by the state that confers the right upon the individuals against one another, however the fundamental rights can be claimed only against the state. Therefore, it is generally assumed that fundamental rights are available only against the state which includes the actions of the state and against the officials of the state. Property right is a recognised right under Article 300A of the Constitution.The provisions of the Constitution pertaining to fundamental rights have no retrospective effect. The word retrospective means intending to take effect from the past date. All the existing laws which are inconsistent, they will be void after the commencement of the Constitution.Q.The state of Kerala made a law stating that no individual can own more than 20 acres of land in his own name. One saint named Keshav challenged it stating that it is violative of Part III of the Constitution and breaches his fundamental rights. Decide.a)Keshav is entitled to own property more than 20 acres.b)The law made by Kerala state is violative of Part III.c)The law made by Kerala state is not violative of Part III.d)Keshav cannot claim fundamental right as he is a saint who has renounced all his rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The term state, under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, 1950, specifies that all the authorities which are functioning within or outside the territory of India will be considered to be the state under Part III of the Constitution. This definition is not exhaustive but inclusive. The authorities which are included in Article 12 are: The government and Parliament of India, the state government and the legislature of each state, all local authorities (municipalities, District Boards, Panchayats, Improvement Trust, Mining Settlement Boards, etc.) and other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.Apart from the central, state and local authorities, the authority or institutions which exercise governmental or sovereign powers or functions can be counted under other authorities.For the purpose of wider application of fundamental rights, state must be defined liberally, but not for other purposes. Therefore, an employee of the public corporation may challenge the violation of his fundamental by the corporation, but for that reason he does not become a state employee and cannot seek the protection.Article 13 of the Constitution speaks about laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights. This Article states that all laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void and that the state shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void. In this Article, unless the context otherwise requires, law includes any ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law; laws in force include laws passed or made by legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas. Last but not the least nothing in this Article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368.Unlike the other legal rights which are created by the state that confers the right upon the individuals against one another, however the fundamental rights can be claimed only against the state. Therefore, it is generally assumed that fundamental rights are available only against the state which includes the actions of the state and against the officials of the state. Property right is a recognised right under Article 300A of the Constitution.The provisions of the Constitution pertaining to fundamental rights have no retrospective effect. The word retrospective means intending to take effect from the past date. All the existing laws which are inconsistent, they will be void after the commencement of the Constitution.Q.The state of Kerala made a law stating that no individual can own more than 20 acres of land in his own name. One saint named Keshav challenged it stating that it is violative of Part III of the Constitution and breaches his fundamental rights. Decide.a)Keshav is entitled to own property more than 20 acres.b)The law made by Kerala state is violative of Part III.c)The law made by Kerala state is not violative of Part III.d)Keshav cannot claim fundamental right as he is a saint who has renounced all his rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The term state, under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, 1950, specifies that all the authorities which are functioning within or outside the territory of India will be considered to be the state under Part III of the Constitution. This definition is not exhaustive but inclusive. The authorities which are included in Article 12 are: The government and Parliament of India, the state government and the legislature of each state, all local authorities (municipalities, District Boards, Panchayats, Improvement Trust, Mining Settlement Boards, etc.) and other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.Apart from the central, state and local authorities, the authority or institutions which exercise governmental or sovereign powers or functions can be counted under other authorities.For the purpose of wider application of fundamental rights, state must be defined liberally, but not for other purposes. Therefore, an employee of the public corporation may challenge the violation of his fundamental by the corporation, but for that reason he does not become a state employee and cannot seek the protection.Article 13 of the Constitution speaks about laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights. This Article states that all laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void and that the state shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void. In this Article, unless the context otherwise requires, law includes any ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law; laws in force include laws passed or made by legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas. Last but not the least nothing in this Article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368.Unlike the other legal rights which are created by the state that confers the right upon the individuals against one another, however the fundamental rights can be claimed only against the state. Therefore, it is generally assumed that fundamental rights are available only against the state which includes the actions of the state and against the officials of the state. Property right is a recognised right under Article 300A of the Constitution.The provisions of the Constitution pertaining to fundamental rights have no retrospective effect. The word retrospective means intending to take effect from the past date. All the existing laws which are inconsistent, they will be void after the commencement of the Constitution.Q.The state of Kerala made a law stating that no individual can own more than 20 acres of land in his own name. One saint named Keshav challenged it stating that it is violative of Part III of the Constitution and breaches his fundamental rights. Decide.a)Keshav is entitled to own property more than 20 acres.b)The law made by Kerala state is violative of Part III.c)The law made by Kerala state is not violative of Part III.d)Keshav cannot claim fundamental right as he is a saint who has renounced all his rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The term state, under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, 1950, specifies that all the authorities which are functioning within or outside the territory of India will be considered to be the state under Part III of the Constitution. This definition is not exhaustive but inclusive. The authorities which are included in Article 12 are: The government and Parliament of India, the state government and the legislature of each state, all local authorities (municipalities, District Boards, Panchayats, Improvement Trust, Mining Settlement Boards, etc.) and other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.Apart from the central, state and local authorities, the authority or institutions which exercise governmental or sovereign powers or functions can be counted under other authorities.For the purpose of wider application of fundamental rights, state must be defined liberally, but not for other purposes. Therefore, an employee of the public corporation may challenge the violation of his fundamental by the corporation, but for that reason he does not become a state employee and cannot seek the protection.Article 13 of the Constitution speaks about laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights. This Article states that all laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void and that the state shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void. In this Article, unless the context otherwise requires, law includes any ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law; laws in force include laws passed or made by legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas. Last but not the least nothing in this Article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368.Unlike the other legal rights which are created by the state that confers the right upon the individuals against one another, however the fundamental rights can be claimed only against the state. Therefore, it is generally assumed that fundamental rights are available only against the state which includes the actions of the state and against the officials of the state. Property right is a recognised right under Article 300A of the Constitution.The provisions of the Constitution pertaining to fundamental rights have no retrospective effect. The word retrospective means intending to take effect from the past date. All the existing laws which are inconsistent, they will be void after the commencement of the Constitution.Q.The state of Kerala made a law stating that no individual can own more than 20 acres of land in his own name. One saint named Keshav challenged it stating that it is violative of Part III of the Constitution and breaches his fundamental rights. Decide.a)Keshav is entitled to own property more than 20 acres.b)The law made by Kerala state is violative of Part III.c)The law made by Kerala state is not violative of Part III.d)Keshav cannot claim fundamental right as he is a saint who has renounced all his rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The term state, under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, 1950, specifies that all the authorities which are functioning within or outside the territory of India will be considered to be the state under Part III of the Constitution. This definition is not exhaustive but inclusive. The authorities which are included in Article 12 are: The government and Parliament of India, the state government and the legislature of each state, all local authorities (municipalities, District Boards, Panchayats, Improvement Trust, Mining Settlement Boards, etc.) and other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.Apart from the central, state and local authorities, the authority or institutions which exercise governmental or sovereign powers or functions can be counted under other authorities.For the purpose of wider application of fundamental rights, state must be defined liberally, but not for other purposes. Therefore, an employee of the public corporation may challenge the violation of his fundamental by the corporation, but for that reason he does not become a state employee and cannot seek the protection.Article 13 of the Constitution speaks about laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights. This Article states that all laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void and that the state shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void. In this Article, unless the context otherwise requires, law includes any ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law; laws in force include laws passed or made by legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas. Last but not the least nothing in this Article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368.Unlike the other legal rights which are created by the state that confers the right upon the individuals against one another, however the fundamental rights can be claimed only against the state. Therefore, it is generally assumed that fundamental rights are available only against the state which includes the actions of the state and against the officials of the state. Property right is a recognised right under Article 300A of the Constitution.The provisions of the Constitution pertaining to fundamental rights have no retrospective effect. The word retrospective means intending to take effect from the past date. All the existing laws which are inconsistent, they will be void after the commencement of the Constitution.Q.The state of Kerala made a law stating that no individual can own more than 20 acres of land in his own name. One saint named Keshav challenged it stating that it is violative of Part III of the Constitution and breaches his fundamental rights. Decide.a)Keshav is entitled to own property more than 20 acres.b)The law made by Kerala state is violative of Part III.c)The law made by Kerala state is not violative of Part III.d)Keshav cannot claim fundamental right as he is a saint who has renounced all his rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The term state, under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, 1950, specifies that all the authorities which are functioning within or outside the territory of India will be considered to be the state under Part III of the Constitution. This definition is not exhaustive but inclusive. The authorities which are included in Article 12 are: The government and Parliament of India, the state government and the legislature of each state, all local authorities (municipalities, District Boards, Panchayats, Improvement Trust, Mining Settlement Boards, etc.) and other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.Apart from the central, state and local authorities, the authority or institutions which exercise governmental or sovereign powers or functions can be counted under other authorities.For the purpose of wider application of fundamental rights, state must be defined liberally, but not for other purposes. Therefore, an employee of the public corporation may challenge the violation of his fundamental by the corporation, but for that reason he does not become a state employee and cannot seek the protection.Article 13 of the Constitution speaks about laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights. This Article states that all laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void and that the state shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void. In this Article, unless the context otherwise requires, law includes any ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law; laws in force include laws passed or made by legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas. Last but not the least nothing in this Article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368.Unlike the other legal rights which are created by the state that confers the right upon the individuals against one another, however the fundamental rights can be claimed only against the state. Therefore, it is generally assumed that fundamental rights are available only against the state which includes the actions of the state and against the officials of the state. Property right is a recognised right under Article 300A of the Constitution.The provisions of the Constitution pertaining to fundamental rights have no retrospective effect. The word retrospective means intending to take effect from the past date. All the existing laws which are inconsistent, they will be void after the commencement of the Constitution.Q.The state of Kerala made a law stating that no individual can own more than 20 acres of land in his own name. One saint named Keshav challenged it stating that it is violative of Part III of the Constitution and breaches his fundamental rights. Decide.a)Keshav is entitled to own property more than 20 acres.b)The law made by Kerala state is violative of Part III.c)The law made by Kerala state is not violative of Part III.d)Keshav cannot claim fundamental right as he is a saint who has renounced all his rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.