CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liab...
Start Learning for Free
PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.
FACTS: Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded market place. The fiery missile came down the shed of a vendor of ginger bread who in order to protect himself, caught it dexterously and threw it away from him. It then fell on the shed of another merchant, who in order to protect himself passed it on precisely in the same way, till at last it burst in Brutus’s face and put his eye out. Brutus sued Marcus. Decide.
- a)Marcus is not liable as he did not foresee the injury suffered by Brutus.
- b)Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.
- c)Marcus is not liable as it was the merchant who ultimately threw the missile on Brutus.
- d)Marcus is not liable as the injury suffered by Brutus is of a remote consequence.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequenc...
Here, Marcus throws the ignited missile wantedly into the crowd as in the other cases it is given that the other shopkeepers did it to save themselves so Marcus is liable for his act.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequenc...
Legal Liability of Marcus
In this scenario, we analyze the liability of Marcus, the tort-feasor, based on the principle that a wrong-doer is liable if the intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.
Intentional Act
- Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded marketplace.
- This act was intentional and reckless, disregarding the safety of others.
Foreseeability of Consequences
- It is reasonable to foresee that throwing a fiery missile in a crowded area would likely cause harm to bystanders.
- The fact that the missile was caught and thrown by merchants does not absolve Marcus of responsibility.
Chain of Events
- The injury to Brutus resulted from a series of reactions initiated by Marcus's original action.
- Each merchant's act of throwing the missile away was a foreseeable response to the danger posed by Marcus's initial throw.
Direct and Indirect Liability
- While the merchants acted to protect themselves, Marcus's initial act set the chain of events in motion that ultimately led to Brutus's injury.
- The law recognizes that if an act foreseeably leads to injury, the original wrong-doer can be held liable, regardless of intervening actions.
Conclusion
- Therefore, Marcus is liable for the injury suffered by Brutus as he intentionally threw the missile, creating a foreseeable risk of harm to people in the marketplace.
- The correct answer is option 'B': Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.
In this scenario, we analyze the liability of Marcus, the tort-feasor, based on the principle that a wrong-doer is liable if the intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.
Intentional Act
- Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded marketplace.
- This act was intentional and reckless, disregarding the safety of others.
Foreseeability of Consequences
- It is reasonable to foresee that throwing a fiery missile in a crowded area would likely cause harm to bystanders.
- The fact that the missile was caught and thrown by merchants does not absolve Marcus of responsibility.
Chain of Events
- The injury to Brutus resulted from a series of reactions initiated by Marcus's original action.
- Each merchant's act of throwing the missile away was a foreseeable response to the danger posed by Marcus's initial throw.
Direct and Indirect Liability
- While the merchants acted to protect themselves, Marcus's initial act set the chain of events in motion that ultimately led to Brutus's injury.
- The law recognizes that if an act foreseeably leads to injury, the original wrong-doer can be held liable, regardless of intervening actions.
Conclusion
- Therefore, Marcus is liable for the injury suffered by Brutus as he intentionally threw the missile, creating a foreseeable risk of harm to people in the marketplace.
- The correct answer is option 'B': Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Question Description
PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.FACTS: Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded market place. The fiery missile came down the shed of a vendor of ginger bread who in order to protect himself, caught it dexterously and threw it away from him. It then fell on the shed of another merchant, who in order to protect himself passed it on precisely in the same way, till at last it burst in Brutus’s face and put his eye out. Brutus sued Marcus. Decide.a)Marcus is not liable as he did not foresee the injury suffered by Brutus.b)Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.c)Marcus is not liable as it was the merchant who ultimately threw the missile on Brutus.d)Marcus is not liable as the injury suffered by Brutus is of a remote consequence.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.FACTS: Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded market place. The fiery missile came down the shed of a vendor of ginger bread who in order to protect himself, caught it dexterously and threw it away from him. It then fell on the shed of another merchant, who in order to protect himself passed it on precisely in the same way, till at last it burst in Brutus’s face and put his eye out. Brutus sued Marcus. Decide.a)Marcus is not liable as he did not foresee the injury suffered by Brutus.b)Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.c)Marcus is not liable as it was the merchant who ultimately threw the missile on Brutus.d)Marcus is not liable as the injury suffered by Brutus is of a remote consequence.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.FACTS: Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded market place. The fiery missile came down the shed of a vendor of ginger bread who in order to protect himself, caught it dexterously and threw it away from him. It then fell on the shed of another merchant, who in order to protect himself passed it on precisely in the same way, till at last it burst in Brutus’s face and put his eye out. Brutus sued Marcus. Decide.a)Marcus is not liable as he did not foresee the injury suffered by Brutus.b)Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.c)Marcus is not liable as it was the merchant who ultimately threw the missile on Brutus.d)Marcus is not liable as the injury suffered by Brutus is of a remote consequence.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.FACTS: Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded market place. The fiery missile came down the shed of a vendor of ginger bread who in order to protect himself, caught it dexterously and threw it away from him. It then fell on the shed of another merchant, who in order to protect himself passed it on precisely in the same way, till at last it burst in Brutus’s face and put his eye out. Brutus sued Marcus. Decide.a)Marcus is not liable as he did not foresee the injury suffered by Brutus.b)Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.c)Marcus is not liable as it was the merchant who ultimately threw the missile on Brutus.d)Marcus is not liable as the injury suffered by Brutus is of a remote consequence.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.FACTS: Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded market place. The fiery missile came down the shed of a vendor of ginger bread who in order to protect himself, caught it dexterously and threw it away from him. It then fell on the shed of another merchant, who in order to protect himself passed it on precisely in the same way, till at last it burst in Brutus’s face and put his eye out. Brutus sued Marcus. Decide.a)Marcus is not liable as he did not foresee the injury suffered by Brutus.b)Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.c)Marcus is not liable as it was the merchant who ultimately threw the missile on Brutus.d)Marcus is not liable as the injury suffered by Brutus is of a remote consequence.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.FACTS: Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded market place. The fiery missile came down the shed of a vendor of ginger bread who in order to protect himself, caught it dexterously and threw it away from him. It then fell on the shed of another merchant, who in order to protect himself passed it on precisely in the same way, till at last it burst in Brutus’s face and put his eye out. Brutus sued Marcus. Decide.a)Marcus is not liable as he did not foresee the injury suffered by Brutus.b)Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.c)Marcus is not liable as it was the merchant who ultimately threw the missile on Brutus.d)Marcus is not liable as the injury suffered by Brutus is of a remote consequence.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.FACTS: Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded market place. The fiery missile came down the shed of a vendor of ginger bread who in order to protect himself, caught it dexterously and threw it away from him. It then fell on the shed of another merchant, who in order to protect himself passed it on precisely in the same way, till at last it burst in Brutus’s face and put his eye out. Brutus sued Marcus. Decide.a)Marcus is not liable as he did not foresee the injury suffered by Brutus.b)Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.c)Marcus is not liable as it was the merchant who ultimately threw the missile on Brutus.d)Marcus is not liable as the injury suffered by Brutus is of a remote consequence.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.FACTS: Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded market place. The fiery missile came down the shed of a vendor of ginger bread who in order to protect himself, caught it dexterously and threw it away from him. It then fell on the shed of another merchant, who in order to protect himself passed it on precisely in the same way, till at last it burst in Brutus’s face and put his eye out. Brutus sued Marcus. Decide.a)Marcus is not liable as he did not foresee the injury suffered by Brutus.b)Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.c)Marcus is not liable as it was the merchant who ultimately threw the missile on Brutus.d)Marcus is not liable as the injury suffered by Brutus is of a remote consequence.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.FACTS: Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded market place. The fiery missile came down the shed of a vendor of ginger bread who in order to protect himself, caught it dexterously and threw it away from him. It then fell on the shed of another merchant, who in order to protect himself passed it on precisely in the same way, till at last it burst in Brutus’s face and put his eye out. Brutus sued Marcus. Decide.a)Marcus is not liable as he did not foresee the injury suffered by Brutus.b)Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.c)Marcus is not liable as it was the merchant who ultimately threw the missile on Brutus.d)Marcus is not liable as the injury suffered by Brutus is of a remote consequence.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.FACTS: Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded market place. The fiery missile came down the shed of a vendor of ginger bread who in order to protect himself, caught it dexterously and threw it away from him. It then fell on the shed of another merchant, who in order to protect himself passed it on precisely in the same way, till at last it burst in Brutus’s face and put his eye out. Brutus sued Marcus. Decide.a)Marcus is not liable as he did not foresee the injury suffered by Brutus.b)Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.c)Marcus is not liable as it was the merchant who ultimately threw the missile on Brutus.d)Marcus is not liable as the injury suffered by Brutus is of a remote consequence.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.FACTS: Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded market place. The fiery missile came down the shed of a vendor of ginger bread who in order to protect himself, caught it dexterously and threw it away from him. It then fell on the shed of another merchant, who in order to protect himself passed it on precisely in the same way, till at last it burst in Brutus’s face and put his eye out. Brutus sued Marcus. Decide.a)Marcus is not liable as he did not foresee the injury suffered by Brutus.b)Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.c)Marcus is not liable as it was the merchant who ultimately threw the missile on Brutus.d)Marcus is not liable as the injury suffered by Brutus is of a remote consequence.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice PRINCIPLE: A tort-feasor (wrong-doer) is liable if intended consequences of his act are evidently foreseeable.FACTS: Marcus threw an ignited missile into a crowded market place. The fiery missile came down the shed of a vendor of ginger bread who in order to protect himself, caught it dexterously and threw it away from him. It then fell on the shed of another merchant, who in order to protect himself passed it on precisely in the same way, till at last it burst in Brutus’s face and put his eye out. Brutus sued Marcus. Decide.a)Marcus is not liable as he did not foresee the injury suffered by Brutus.b)Marcus is liable as he intentionally threw the missile into the market place.c)Marcus is not liable as it was the merchant who ultimately threw the missile on Brutus.d)Marcus is not liable as the injury suffered by Brutus is of a remote consequence.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup on EduRev and stay on top of your study goals
10M+ students crushing their study goals daily