Question Description
Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.Poverty measurement is an unsettled issue, both conceptually and methodologically. Since poverty is a process as well as an outcome; many come out of it while others may be falling into it. The net effect of these two parallel processes Is a proportion commonly identified as the ‘head count ratio’, but these ratios hide the fundamental dynamism that characterises poverty in practice. The most recent poverty reestimates by an expert group has also missed the crucial dynamism. In a study conducted on 13.000 households which represented the entire country in 1993-94 and again on 2004-05. it was found that in the ten-year period 18.2% rural population moved out of poverty whereas another 22.1% fell into it over this period. This net increase of about four percentage points was seen to have a considerable variation across states and regions.Q.Which of the following is aninferencewhich can be made from the facts stated in the above paragraph?a)Poverty measurement tools in India arc outdated.b)Increase in number of persons falling into poverty varies considerably across the country over a period of time.c)Government of India has stopped measuring poverty related studies.d)People living in rural areas are more susceptible to fall into poverty over the timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.Poverty measurement is an unsettled issue, both conceptually and methodologically. Since poverty is a process as well as an outcome; many come out of it while others may be falling into it. The net effect of these two parallel processes Is a proportion commonly identified as the ‘head count ratio’, but these ratios hide the fundamental dynamism that characterises poverty in practice. The most recent poverty reestimates by an expert group has also missed the crucial dynamism. In a study conducted on 13.000 households which represented the entire country in 1993-94 and again on 2004-05. it was found that in the ten-year period 18.2% rural population moved out of poverty whereas another 22.1% fell into it over this period. This net increase of about four percentage points was seen to have a considerable variation across states and regions.Q.Which of the following is aninferencewhich can be made from the facts stated in the above paragraph?a)Poverty measurement tools in India arc outdated.b)Increase in number of persons falling into poverty varies considerably across the country over a period of time.c)Government of India has stopped measuring poverty related studies.d)People living in rural areas are more susceptible to fall into poverty over the timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.Poverty measurement is an unsettled issue, both conceptually and methodologically. Since poverty is a process as well as an outcome; many come out of it while others may be falling into it. The net effect of these two parallel processes Is a proportion commonly identified as the ‘head count ratio’, but these ratios hide the fundamental dynamism that characterises poverty in practice. The most recent poverty reestimates by an expert group has also missed the crucial dynamism. In a study conducted on 13.000 households which represented the entire country in 1993-94 and again on 2004-05. it was found that in the ten-year period 18.2% rural population moved out of poverty whereas another 22.1% fell into it over this period. This net increase of about four percentage points was seen to have a considerable variation across states and regions.Q.Which of the following is aninferencewhich can be made from the facts stated in the above paragraph?a)Poverty measurement tools in India arc outdated.b)Increase in number of persons falling into poverty varies considerably across the country over a period of time.c)Government of India has stopped measuring poverty related studies.d)People living in rural areas are more susceptible to fall into poverty over the timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.Poverty measurement is an unsettled issue, both conceptually and methodologically. Since poverty is a process as well as an outcome; many come out of it while others may be falling into it. The net effect of these two parallel processes Is a proportion commonly identified as the ‘head count ratio’, but these ratios hide the fundamental dynamism that characterises poverty in practice. The most recent poverty reestimates by an expert group has also missed the crucial dynamism. In a study conducted on 13.000 households which represented the entire country in 1993-94 and again on 2004-05. it was found that in the ten-year period 18.2% rural population moved out of poverty whereas another 22.1% fell into it over this period. This net increase of about four percentage points was seen to have a considerable variation across states and regions.Q.Which of the following is aninferencewhich can be made from the facts stated in the above paragraph?a)Poverty measurement tools in India arc outdated.b)Increase in number of persons falling into poverty varies considerably across the country over a period of time.c)Government of India has stopped measuring poverty related studies.d)People living in rural areas are more susceptible to fall into poverty over the timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.Poverty measurement is an unsettled issue, both conceptually and methodologically. Since poverty is a process as well as an outcome; many come out of it while others may be falling into it. The net effect of these two parallel processes Is a proportion commonly identified as the ‘head count ratio’, but these ratios hide the fundamental dynamism that characterises poverty in practice. The most recent poverty reestimates by an expert group has also missed the crucial dynamism. In a study conducted on 13.000 households which represented the entire country in 1993-94 and again on 2004-05. it was found that in the ten-year period 18.2% rural population moved out of poverty whereas another 22.1% fell into it over this period. This net increase of about four percentage points was seen to have a considerable variation across states and regions.Q.Which of the following is aninferencewhich can be made from the facts stated in the above paragraph?a)Poverty measurement tools in India arc outdated.b)Increase in number of persons falling into poverty varies considerably across the country over a period of time.c)Government of India has stopped measuring poverty related studies.d)People living in rural areas are more susceptible to fall into poverty over the timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.Poverty measurement is an unsettled issue, both conceptually and methodologically. Since poverty is a process as well as an outcome; many come out of it while others may be falling into it. The net effect of these two parallel processes Is a proportion commonly identified as the ‘head count ratio’, but these ratios hide the fundamental dynamism that characterises poverty in practice. The most recent poverty reestimates by an expert group has also missed the crucial dynamism. In a study conducted on 13.000 households which represented the entire country in 1993-94 and again on 2004-05. it was found that in the ten-year period 18.2% rural population moved out of poverty whereas another 22.1% fell into it over this period. This net increase of about four percentage points was seen to have a considerable variation across states and regions.Q.Which of the following is aninferencewhich can be made from the facts stated in the above paragraph?a)Poverty measurement tools in India arc outdated.b)Increase in number of persons falling into poverty varies considerably across the country over a period of time.c)Government of India has stopped measuring poverty related studies.d)People living in rural areas are more susceptible to fall into poverty over the timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.Poverty measurement is an unsettled issue, both conceptually and methodologically. Since poverty is a process as well as an outcome; many come out of it while others may be falling into it. The net effect of these two parallel processes Is a proportion commonly identified as the ‘head count ratio’, but these ratios hide the fundamental dynamism that characterises poverty in practice. The most recent poverty reestimates by an expert group has also missed the crucial dynamism. In a study conducted on 13.000 households which represented the entire country in 1993-94 and again on 2004-05. it was found that in the ten-year period 18.2% rural population moved out of poverty whereas another 22.1% fell into it over this period. This net increase of about four percentage points was seen to have a considerable variation across states and regions.Q.Which of the following is aninferencewhich can be made from the facts stated in the above paragraph?a)Poverty measurement tools in India arc outdated.b)Increase in number of persons falling into poverty varies considerably across the country over a period of time.c)Government of India has stopped measuring poverty related studies.d)People living in rural areas are more susceptible to fall into poverty over the timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.Poverty measurement is an unsettled issue, both conceptually and methodologically. Since poverty is a process as well as an outcome; many come out of it while others may be falling into it. The net effect of these two parallel processes Is a proportion commonly identified as the ‘head count ratio’, but these ratios hide the fundamental dynamism that characterises poverty in practice. The most recent poverty reestimates by an expert group has also missed the crucial dynamism. In a study conducted on 13.000 households which represented the entire country in 1993-94 and again on 2004-05. it was found that in the ten-year period 18.2% rural population moved out of poverty whereas another 22.1% fell into it over this period. This net increase of about four percentage points was seen to have a considerable variation across states and regions.Q.Which of the following is aninferencewhich can be made from the facts stated in the above paragraph?a)Poverty measurement tools in India arc outdated.b)Increase in number of persons falling into poverty varies considerably across the country over a period of time.c)Government of India has stopped measuring poverty related studies.d)People living in rural areas are more susceptible to fall into poverty over the timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.Poverty measurement is an unsettled issue, both conceptually and methodologically. Since poverty is a process as well as an outcome; many come out of it while others may be falling into it. The net effect of these two parallel processes Is a proportion commonly identified as the ‘head count ratio’, but these ratios hide the fundamental dynamism that characterises poverty in practice. The most recent poverty reestimates by an expert group has also missed the crucial dynamism. In a study conducted on 13.000 households which represented the entire country in 1993-94 and again on 2004-05. it was found that in the ten-year period 18.2% rural population moved out of poverty whereas another 22.1% fell into it over this period. This net increase of about four percentage points was seen to have a considerable variation across states and regions.Q.Which of the following is aninferencewhich can be made from the facts stated in the above paragraph?a)Poverty measurement tools in India arc outdated.b)Increase in number of persons falling into poverty varies considerably across the country over a period of time.c)Government of India has stopped measuring poverty related studies.d)People living in rural areas are more susceptible to fall into poverty over the timeCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.