Question Description
The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Initially, Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code came under much flak as it didnt prescribe death penalty which was provided for in case of murder. There was a proposal to amend this section and provide stricter punishment for dowry deaths. The 202ndreport of Law Commission presented in 2007 did not approve of the proposed amendment as prosecution under Section 304B is no bar to prosecution for murder. Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code states that if a woman dies within seven years of marriage by any burns or bodily injury or it was revealed that before her death she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative of the husband in connection to demand dowry, then the death of the woman will be considered a dowry death. Punishment for dowry death is a minimum sentence of imprisonment for seven years or a maximum sentence of imprisonment for life.To hold a person under this section, it is required that death should be caused by burns or bodily injury or by any other circumstances and it must occur within the seven years of marriage. Also, it must be revealed that soon before her marriage she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative and that it was so in connection with the demand for dowry.As per Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, dowry is any property or valuable security directly or indirectly agreed to be given by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage or by the parent of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the marriage or to any other person, at or before or any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage of the said parties.Section 304B deals with both homicidal and suicidal deaths. These provisions show a marked departure from the ordinary principles of criminal law wherein its entirely upon the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. In cases of dowry death, the prosecution has to discharge the initial burden of ruling out the possibility of a natural death and adducing evidence of link between the death of the woman and cruelty related to dowry demand. Beyond this, the onus shifts onto the accused to prove his innocence.Q.Raj and Rani were married to each other. Raj always used to taunt Rani for bringing less money at the time of her marriage and at several instances physically assaulted her as well. After nearly 10 years of their marriage, Rani could not bear it any further and killed herself by jumping from the 32ndfloor of her apartment. Decide whether this will amount to dowry death.a)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had assaulted her for the same.b)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had demanded money and had done cruelty towards Rani.c)Raj is not liable as Rani had no burn marks on her body to prove cruelty for dowry demand.d)Raj shall be not liable for dowry death.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Initially, Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code came under much flak as it didnt prescribe death penalty which was provided for in case of murder. There was a proposal to amend this section and provide stricter punishment for dowry deaths. The 202ndreport of Law Commission presented in 2007 did not approve of the proposed amendment as prosecution under Section 304B is no bar to prosecution for murder. Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code states that if a woman dies within seven years of marriage by any burns or bodily injury or it was revealed that before her death she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative of the husband in connection to demand dowry, then the death of the woman will be considered a dowry death. Punishment for dowry death is a minimum sentence of imprisonment for seven years or a maximum sentence of imprisonment for life.To hold a person under this section, it is required that death should be caused by burns or bodily injury or by any other circumstances and it must occur within the seven years of marriage. Also, it must be revealed that soon before her marriage she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative and that it was so in connection with the demand for dowry.As per Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, dowry is any property or valuable security directly or indirectly agreed to be given by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage or by the parent of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the marriage or to any other person, at or before or any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage of the said parties.Section 304B deals with both homicidal and suicidal deaths. These provisions show a marked departure from the ordinary principles of criminal law wherein its entirely upon the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. In cases of dowry death, the prosecution has to discharge the initial burden of ruling out the possibility of a natural death and adducing evidence of link between the death of the woman and cruelty related to dowry demand. Beyond this, the onus shifts onto the accused to prove his innocence.Q.Raj and Rani were married to each other. Raj always used to taunt Rani for bringing less money at the time of her marriage and at several instances physically assaulted her as well. After nearly 10 years of their marriage, Rani could not bear it any further and killed herself by jumping from the 32ndfloor of her apartment. Decide whether this will amount to dowry death.a)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had assaulted her for the same.b)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had demanded money and had done cruelty towards Rani.c)Raj is not liable as Rani had no burn marks on her body to prove cruelty for dowry demand.d)Raj shall be not liable for dowry death.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Initially, Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code came under much flak as it didnt prescribe death penalty which was provided for in case of murder. There was a proposal to amend this section and provide stricter punishment for dowry deaths. The 202ndreport of Law Commission presented in 2007 did not approve of the proposed amendment as prosecution under Section 304B is no bar to prosecution for murder. Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code states that if a woman dies within seven years of marriage by any burns or bodily injury or it was revealed that before her death she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative of the husband in connection to demand dowry, then the death of the woman will be considered a dowry death. Punishment for dowry death is a minimum sentence of imprisonment for seven years or a maximum sentence of imprisonment for life.To hold a person under this section, it is required that death should be caused by burns or bodily injury or by any other circumstances and it must occur within the seven years of marriage. Also, it must be revealed that soon before her marriage she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative and that it was so in connection with the demand for dowry.As per Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, dowry is any property or valuable security directly or indirectly agreed to be given by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage or by the parent of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the marriage or to any other person, at or before or any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage of the said parties.Section 304B deals with both homicidal and suicidal deaths. These provisions show a marked departure from the ordinary principles of criminal law wherein its entirely upon the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. In cases of dowry death, the prosecution has to discharge the initial burden of ruling out the possibility of a natural death and adducing evidence of link between the death of the woman and cruelty related to dowry demand. Beyond this, the onus shifts onto the accused to prove his innocence.Q.Raj and Rani were married to each other. Raj always used to taunt Rani for bringing less money at the time of her marriage and at several instances physically assaulted her as well. After nearly 10 years of their marriage, Rani could not bear it any further and killed herself by jumping from the 32ndfloor of her apartment. Decide whether this will amount to dowry death.a)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had assaulted her for the same.b)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had demanded money and had done cruelty towards Rani.c)Raj is not liable as Rani had no burn marks on her body to prove cruelty for dowry demand.d)Raj shall be not liable for dowry death.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Initially, Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code came under much flak as it didnt prescribe death penalty which was provided for in case of murder. There was a proposal to amend this section and provide stricter punishment for dowry deaths. The 202ndreport of Law Commission presented in 2007 did not approve of the proposed amendment as prosecution under Section 304B is no bar to prosecution for murder. Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code states that if a woman dies within seven years of marriage by any burns or bodily injury or it was revealed that before her death she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative of the husband in connection to demand dowry, then the death of the woman will be considered a dowry death. Punishment for dowry death is a minimum sentence of imprisonment for seven years or a maximum sentence of imprisonment for life.To hold a person under this section, it is required that death should be caused by burns or bodily injury or by any other circumstances and it must occur within the seven years of marriage. Also, it must be revealed that soon before her marriage she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative and that it was so in connection with the demand for dowry.As per Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, dowry is any property or valuable security directly or indirectly agreed to be given by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage or by the parent of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the marriage or to any other person, at or before or any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage of the said parties.Section 304B deals with both homicidal and suicidal deaths. These provisions show a marked departure from the ordinary principles of criminal law wherein its entirely upon the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. In cases of dowry death, the prosecution has to discharge the initial burden of ruling out the possibility of a natural death and adducing evidence of link between the death of the woman and cruelty related to dowry demand. Beyond this, the onus shifts onto the accused to prove his innocence.Q.Raj and Rani were married to each other. Raj always used to taunt Rani for bringing less money at the time of her marriage and at several instances physically assaulted her as well. After nearly 10 years of their marriage, Rani could not bear it any further and killed herself by jumping from the 32ndfloor of her apartment. Decide whether this will amount to dowry death.a)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had assaulted her for the same.b)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had demanded money and had done cruelty towards Rani.c)Raj is not liable as Rani had no burn marks on her body to prove cruelty for dowry demand.d)Raj shall be not liable for dowry death.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Initially, Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code came under much flak as it didnt prescribe death penalty which was provided for in case of murder. There was a proposal to amend this section and provide stricter punishment for dowry deaths. The 202ndreport of Law Commission presented in 2007 did not approve of the proposed amendment as prosecution under Section 304B is no bar to prosecution for murder. Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code states that if a woman dies within seven years of marriage by any burns or bodily injury or it was revealed that before her death she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative of the husband in connection to demand dowry, then the death of the woman will be considered a dowry death. Punishment for dowry death is a minimum sentence of imprisonment for seven years or a maximum sentence of imprisonment for life.To hold a person under this section, it is required that death should be caused by burns or bodily injury or by any other circumstances and it must occur within the seven years of marriage. Also, it must be revealed that soon before her marriage she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative and that it was so in connection with the demand for dowry.As per Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, dowry is any property or valuable security directly or indirectly agreed to be given by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage or by the parent of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the marriage or to any other person, at or before or any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage of the said parties.Section 304B deals with both homicidal and suicidal deaths. These provisions show a marked departure from the ordinary principles of criminal law wherein its entirely upon the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. In cases of dowry death, the prosecution has to discharge the initial burden of ruling out the possibility of a natural death and adducing evidence of link between the death of the woman and cruelty related to dowry demand. Beyond this, the onus shifts onto the accused to prove his innocence.Q.Raj and Rani were married to each other. Raj always used to taunt Rani for bringing less money at the time of her marriage and at several instances physically assaulted her as well. After nearly 10 years of their marriage, Rani could not bear it any further and killed herself by jumping from the 32ndfloor of her apartment. Decide whether this will amount to dowry death.a)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had assaulted her for the same.b)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had demanded money and had done cruelty towards Rani.c)Raj is not liable as Rani had no burn marks on her body to prove cruelty for dowry demand.d)Raj shall be not liable for dowry death.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Initially, Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code came under much flak as it didnt prescribe death penalty which was provided for in case of murder. There was a proposal to amend this section and provide stricter punishment for dowry deaths. The 202ndreport of Law Commission presented in 2007 did not approve of the proposed amendment as prosecution under Section 304B is no bar to prosecution for murder. Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code states that if a woman dies within seven years of marriage by any burns or bodily injury or it was revealed that before her death she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative of the husband in connection to demand dowry, then the death of the woman will be considered a dowry death. Punishment for dowry death is a minimum sentence of imprisonment for seven years or a maximum sentence of imprisonment for life.To hold a person under this section, it is required that death should be caused by burns or bodily injury or by any other circumstances and it must occur within the seven years of marriage. Also, it must be revealed that soon before her marriage she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative and that it was so in connection with the demand for dowry.As per Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, dowry is any property or valuable security directly or indirectly agreed to be given by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage or by the parent of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the marriage or to any other person, at or before or any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage of the said parties.Section 304B deals with both homicidal and suicidal deaths. These provisions show a marked departure from the ordinary principles of criminal law wherein its entirely upon the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. In cases of dowry death, the prosecution has to discharge the initial burden of ruling out the possibility of a natural death and adducing evidence of link between the death of the woman and cruelty related to dowry demand. Beyond this, the onus shifts onto the accused to prove his innocence.Q.Raj and Rani were married to each other. Raj always used to taunt Rani for bringing less money at the time of her marriage and at several instances physically assaulted her as well. After nearly 10 years of their marriage, Rani could not bear it any further and killed herself by jumping from the 32ndfloor of her apartment. Decide whether this will amount to dowry death.a)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had assaulted her for the same.b)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had demanded money and had done cruelty towards Rani.c)Raj is not liable as Rani had no burn marks on her body to prove cruelty for dowry demand.d)Raj shall be not liable for dowry death.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Initially, Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code came under much flak as it didnt prescribe death penalty which was provided for in case of murder. There was a proposal to amend this section and provide stricter punishment for dowry deaths. The 202ndreport of Law Commission presented in 2007 did not approve of the proposed amendment as prosecution under Section 304B is no bar to prosecution for murder. Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code states that if a woman dies within seven years of marriage by any burns or bodily injury or it was revealed that before her death she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative of the husband in connection to demand dowry, then the death of the woman will be considered a dowry death. Punishment for dowry death is a minimum sentence of imprisonment for seven years or a maximum sentence of imprisonment for life.To hold a person under this section, it is required that death should be caused by burns or bodily injury or by any other circumstances and it must occur within the seven years of marriage. Also, it must be revealed that soon before her marriage she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative and that it was so in connection with the demand for dowry.As per Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, dowry is any property or valuable security directly or indirectly agreed to be given by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage or by the parent of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the marriage or to any other person, at or before or any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage of the said parties.Section 304B deals with both homicidal and suicidal deaths. These provisions show a marked departure from the ordinary principles of criminal law wherein its entirely upon the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. In cases of dowry death, the prosecution has to discharge the initial burden of ruling out the possibility of a natural death and adducing evidence of link between the death of the woman and cruelty related to dowry demand. Beyond this, the onus shifts onto the accused to prove his innocence.Q.Raj and Rani were married to each other. Raj always used to taunt Rani for bringing less money at the time of her marriage and at several instances physically assaulted her as well. After nearly 10 years of their marriage, Rani could not bear it any further and killed herself by jumping from the 32ndfloor of her apartment. Decide whether this will amount to dowry death.a)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had assaulted her for the same.b)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had demanded money and had done cruelty towards Rani.c)Raj is not liable as Rani had no burn marks on her body to prove cruelty for dowry demand.d)Raj shall be not liable for dowry death.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Initially, Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code came under much flak as it didnt prescribe death penalty which was provided for in case of murder. There was a proposal to amend this section and provide stricter punishment for dowry deaths. The 202ndreport of Law Commission presented in 2007 did not approve of the proposed amendment as prosecution under Section 304B is no bar to prosecution for murder. Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code states that if a woman dies within seven years of marriage by any burns or bodily injury or it was revealed that before her death she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative of the husband in connection to demand dowry, then the death of the woman will be considered a dowry death. Punishment for dowry death is a minimum sentence of imprisonment for seven years or a maximum sentence of imprisonment for life.To hold a person under this section, it is required that death should be caused by burns or bodily injury or by any other circumstances and it must occur within the seven years of marriage. Also, it must be revealed that soon before her marriage she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative and that it was so in connection with the demand for dowry.As per Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, dowry is any property or valuable security directly or indirectly agreed to be given by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage or by the parent of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the marriage or to any other person, at or before or any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage of the said parties.Section 304B deals with both homicidal and suicidal deaths. These provisions show a marked departure from the ordinary principles of criminal law wherein its entirely upon the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. In cases of dowry death, the prosecution has to discharge the initial burden of ruling out the possibility of a natural death and adducing evidence of link between the death of the woman and cruelty related to dowry demand. Beyond this, the onus shifts onto the accused to prove his innocence.Q.Raj and Rani were married to each other. Raj always used to taunt Rani for bringing less money at the time of her marriage and at several instances physically assaulted her as well. After nearly 10 years of their marriage, Rani could not bear it any further and killed herself by jumping from the 32ndfloor of her apartment. Decide whether this will amount to dowry death.a)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had assaulted her for the same.b)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had demanded money and had done cruelty towards Rani.c)Raj is not liable as Rani had no burn marks on her body to prove cruelty for dowry demand.d)Raj shall be not liable for dowry death.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Initially, Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code came under much flak as it didnt prescribe death penalty which was provided for in case of murder. There was a proposal to amend this section and provide stricter punishment for dowry deaths. The 202ndreport of Law Commission presented in 2007 did not approve of the proposed amendment as prosecution under Section 304B is no bar to prosecution for murder. Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code states that if a woman dies within seven years of marriage by any burns or bodily injury or it was revealed that before her death she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative of the husband in connection to demand dowry, then the death of the woman will be considered a dowry death. Punishment for dowry death is a minimum sentence of imprisonment for seven years or a maximum sentence of imprisonment for life.To hold a person under this section, it is required that death should be caused by burns or bodily injury or by any other circumstances and it must occur within the seven years of marriage. Also, it must be revealed that soon before her marriage she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative and that it was so in connection with the demand for dowry.As per Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, dowry is any property or valuable security directly or indirectly agreed to be given by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage or by the parent of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the marriage or to any other person, at or before or any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage of the said parties.Section 304B deals with both homicidal and suicidal deaths. These provisions show a marked departure from the ordinary principles of criminal law wherein its entirely upon the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. In cases of dowry death, the prosecution has to discharge the initial burden of ruling out the possibility of a natural death and adducing evidence of link between the death of the woman and cruelty related to dowry demand. Beyond this, the onus shifts onto the accused to prove his innocence.Q.Raj and Rani were married to each other. Raj always used to taunt Rani for bringing less money at the time of her marriage and at several instances physically assaulted her as well. After nearly 10 years of their marriage, Rani could not bear it any further and killed herself by jumping from the 32ndfloor of her apartment. Decide whether this will amount to dowry death.a)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had assaulted her for the same.b)Raj is liable for dowry death as he had demanded money and had done cruelty towards Rani.c)Raj is not liable as Rani had no burn marks on her body to prove cruelty for dowry demand.d)Raj shall be not liable for dowry death.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.