UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Which Roman wrote: In no year does India draw... Start Learning for Free
Which Roman wrote: “In no year does India draw our empire of less than five hundred and fifty millions of sesterces”?
  • a)
    Pliny
  • b)
    Strabo
  • c)
    Justin
  • d)
    Plutarch
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Which Roman wrote: In no year does India draw our empire of less than ...
Pliny the Elder wrote the statement "In no year does India draw our empire of less than five hundred and fifty millions of sesterces." This statement can be found in his work, Naturalis Historia, which is a 37-volume encyclopedia that covers a wide range of topics including geography, botany, zoology, and mineralogy.

Explanation:
Pliny the Elder was a Roman author, naturalist, and philosopher who lived during the first century AD. He was known for his extensive knowledge and writings on a variety of subjects, including the natural world, history, and geography. In Naturalis Historia, Pliny provides a detailed account of the geography and natural resources of the Roman Empire and its neighboring regions.

The statement in question refers specifically to the wealth that India was able to generate through trade with the Roman Empire. Pliny notes that India was a major source of luxury goods such as spices, silk, and precious stones, and that Roman demand for these goods was so high that India was able to draw an enormous amount of wealth from the empire.

Pliny's estimate of five hundred and fifty million sesterces is a staggering amount of money, equivalent to tens of billions of dollars in today's currency. It underscores the importance of India as a trading partner for the Roman Empire and provides insight into the vast wealth that was generated through long-distance trade in the ancient world.

In conclusion, Pliny the Elder's statement about India's economic importance to the Roman Empire is a testament to the enduring legacy of ancient trade networks and the global interconnectedness of human societies.
Free Test
Community Answer
Which Roman wrote: In no year does India draw our empire of less than ...
Answer is a here
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

Group QuestionThe passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The management team of Eta, a footwear company implemented a massive revamping exercise after making losses for four consecutive fiscal years in which more than 250 managers and their juniors were asked to quit. Eta decided to stop further recruitment. The management offered its staff a performance based salary. In 1996, for the first time in Etas 62-year-old history, the company signed a long-term bipartite agreement. This agreement was signed without any disruption of work. In the six-year period 1993-99, Eta had considerably brought down the staff strength of its Itanagar factory and Calcutta offices to 6,700.In fiscal year 1996, Eta was back in the black with the company reporting net profits of Rs. 41.5 million on revenues of Rs. 5.90 billion (Rs. 5.32 billion in 1995). In fiscal year 1997, Eta further consolidated the gains with the company reporting net profits of Rs 166.9 million on revenues of Rs. 6.70 billion. A senior HR manager at the company admitted that with an upswing in Etas fortunes, even its traditionally intransigent workers were motivated to do better. In 1997, Eta workers achieved 93% of their production targets. The management rewarded the workers with a 17% bonus, up from the 15% given in 1996.However, by the end of 1997, Eta still faced problems of a high-cost structure and surplus labor. In fact, the turnaround had made the unions more aggressive and demanding. Etas CEO had failed to strike a deal with the All India Eta Shop Managers Union (AIESMU) since the third quarter of 1997. The shop managers were insisting that Eta honour the 1990 agreement, which stipulated that the management would fill up 248 vacancies in its retail outlets. It also opposed the move to sack all the cashiers in outlets with annual sales of less than Rs 5 million, which meant elimination of 690 jobs.Q. In the wake of the dispute with the AIESMU, what shouldthe reaction of the management be?

The management team of Eta, a footwear company implemented a massive revamping exercise after making losses for four consecutive fiscal years in which more than 250 managers and their juniors were asked to quit. Eta decided to stop further recruitment. The management offered its staff a performance based salary. In 1996, for the first time in Etas 62-year-old history, the company signed a long-term bipartite agreement. This agreement was signed without any disruption of work. In the six-year period 1993-99, Eta had considerably brought down the staff strength of its Itanagar factory and Calcutta offices to 6,700.In fiscal year 1996, Eta was back in the black with the company reporting net profits of Rs. 41.5 million on revenues of Rs. 5.90 billion (Rs. 5.32 billion in 1995). In fiscal year 1997, Eta further consolidated the gains with the company reporting net profits of Rs 166.9 million on revenues of Rs. 6.70 billion. A senior HR manager at the company admitted that with an upswing in Etas fortunes, even its traditionally intransigent workers were motivated to do better. In 1997, Eta workers achieved 93% of their production targets. The management rewarded the workers with a 17% bonus, up from the 15% given in 1996.However, by the end of 1997, Eta still faced problems of a high-cost structure and surplus labor. In fact, the turnaround had made the unions more aggressive and demanding. Etas CEO had failed to strike a deal with the All India Eta Shop Managers Union (AIESMU) since the third quarter of 1997. The shop managers were insisting that Eta honour the 1990 agreement, which stipulated that the management would fill up 248 vacancies in its retail outlets. It also opposed the move to sack all the cashiers in outlets with annual sales of less than Rs 5 million, which meant elimination of 690 jobs.Q. Which of the following is most unlikely to be a priority of the management?

The management team of Eta, a footwear company implemented a massive revamping exercise after making losses for four consecutive fiscal years in which more than 250 managers and their juniors were asked to quit. Eta decided to stop further recruitment. The management offered its staff a performance based salary. In 1996, for the first time in Etas 62-year-old history, the company signed a long-term bipartite agreement. This agreement was signed without any disruption of work. In the six-year period 1993-99, Eta had considerably brought down the staff strength of its Itanagar factory and Calcutta offices to 6,700.In fiscal year 1996, Eta was back in the black with the company reporting net profits of Rs. 41.5 million on revenues of Rs. 5.90 billion (Rs. 5.32 billion in 1995). In fiscal year 1997, Eta further consolidated the gains with the company reporting net profits of Rs 166.9 million on revenues of Rs. 6.70 billion. A senior HR manager at the company admitted that with an upswing in Etas fortunes, even its traditionally intransigent workers were motivated to do better. In 1997, Eta workers achieved 93% of their production targets. The management rewarded the workers with a 17% bonus, up from the 15% given in 1996.However, by the end of 1997, Eta still faced problems of a high-cost structure and surplus labor. In fact, the turnaround had made the unions more aggressive and demanding. Etas CEO had failed to strike a deal with the All India Eta Shop Managers Union (AIESMU) since the third quarter of 1997. The shop managers were insisting that Eta honour the 1990 agreement, which stipulated that the management would fill up 248 vacancies in its retail outlets. It also opposed the move to sack all the cashiers in outlets with annual sales of less than Rs 5 million, which meant elimination of 690 jobs.Q. As a lawyer working for Dastur and Associates, you have been asked to mediate the dispute. What is likely to be the sequence in your course of action from the options given? A. Call a meeting with both parties at once.B. Study different approaches to the situation.C. Meet both parties individually.D. Suggest a solution that is median to both parties requirements.

Directions (Q.1-10) for the following 10items:Read the following three passages and answer the items that follow each passage. Your answers to these items should be based on these passages only. Passage 1Theres been a change in the weather. Extreme events like the Nashville flood - described by officials as a once - in - a - millennium occurrence - are happening more frequently than they used to. A month before Nashville, torrential downpours dumped 11 inches of rain on Rio de janeiro in 24 hours, triggering mud slides that buried hundreds. About three months after Nashville, record rain in Pakistan caused flooding that affected more than 20 million people. In late 2011, floods in Thailand submerged hundreds of factories near Bangkok, creating a worldwide shortage of computer hard drives.And it is not just heavy rains that are making headlines. During the past decade we have also been severe droughts in places like Texas, Australia and Russia as well as in East Africa, where tens of thousands have taken refuge in camps. Deadly heat waves hit Europe, and record numbers of tornadoes have ripped across the United States. Losses from such events helped push the cost of whether disasters in 2011 to an estimated $150 billion worldwide, a roughly 25% jump from the previous year. In the USA, last year, a record 14 events caused a billion dollars or more of damage each, far exceeding the previous record of 9 such disasters in 2008.What is going on? Are these extreme events signals of a dangerous, human made shift in Earths climate? Or are we just going through a natural stretch of bad luck?The short answer is: probably both. The primary forces driving recent disasters have been natural climate cycles, especially El Nino and La Nina. Scientists have learned a lot during the past few decades about how that strange seesaw in the equatorial Pacific affects weather worldwide. During an El Nino, a giant pool of warm water that normally sits in the central Pacific surges east all the way to South America; during a La Nina, it shrinks and retreats into the Western Pacific. Heat and water vapour coming off the warm pool generate thunderstorms so powerful and towering that their influence extends out of the tropics to the jet streams that blow across the middle altitudes. As the warm pool shifts back and forth along the equator, the wavy paths of the jet streams shift north and south- which changes the tracks that storms follow across the continents. An El Nino tends to push directing storms over the southern USA and Peru while visiting drought and fire on Australia. In a La Nina, the rains flood Australia and fail in the American Southwest and Texas - and in even more distant places like East Africa.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?

Top Courses for UPSC

Which Roman wrote: In no year does India draw our empire of less than five hundred and fifty millions of sesterces?a)Plinyb)Straboc)Justind)PlutarchCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which Roman wrote: In no year does India draw our empire of less than five hundred and fifty millions of sesterces?a)Plinyb)Straboc)Justind)PlutarchCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Which Roman wrote: In no year does India draw our empire of less than five hundred and fifty millions of sesterces?a)Plinyb)Straboc)Justind)PlutarchCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which Roman wrote: In no year does India draw our empire of less than five hundred and fifty millions of sesterces?a)Plinyb)Straboc)Justind)PlutarchCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which Roman wrote: In no year does India draw our empire of less than five hundred and fifty millions of sesterces?a)Plinyb)Straboc)Justind)PlutarchCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which Roman wrote: In no year does India draw our empire of less than five hundred and fifty millions of sesterces?a)Plinyb)Straboc)Justind)PlutarchCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which Roman wrote: In no year does India draw our empire of less than five hundred and fifty millions of sesterces?a)Plinyb)Straboc)Justind)PlutarchCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which Roman wrote: In no year does India draw our empire of less than five hundred and fifty millions of sesterces?a)Plinyb)Straboc)Justind)PlutarchCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which Roman wrote: In no year does India draw our empire of less than five hundred and fifty millions of sesterces?a)Plinyb)Straboc)Justind)PlutarchCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which Roman wrote: In no year does India draw our empire of less than five hundred and fifty millions of sesterces?a)Plinyb)Straboc)Justind)PlutarchCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev