Question Description
PRINCIPLE:Under an established tort law, a person has no legal remedy for an injury caused to him, by an act to which he has himself consented, expressly or impliedly.FACTS: Every evening, Rania Mirza went to the Tennis Institute near her home to practice tennis. On one such evening, as she walked into the academy, she was looking at the ground, lost in her thoughts. Suddenly, a tennis ball came flying from the court and hit her on the head. The head injury was not severe, but as a result of the sudden hit, her steps faltered and she fell, and got scratches on her legs and arms. She decided to go to the nearby hospital and get her wounds dressed. On the way, she got hit by a speeding vehicle that was travelling well above the permissible speed limit. Does Rania have a remedy against the driver of the vehicle?a)Yes, since she had not consented to being hit by a vehicleb)Yes, because rash and negligent driving is an offencec)No, because Rania should have asked someone for help and not gone aloned)No, because she was lost in her boyfriend’s thought as she was crossing the roadCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE:Under an established tort law, a person has no legal remedy for an injury caused to him, by an act to which he has himself consented, expressly or impliedly.FACTS: Every evening, Rania Mirza went to the Tennis Institute near her home to practice tennis. On one such evening, as she walked into the academy, she was looking at the ground, lost in her thoughts. Suddenly, a tennis ball came flying from the court and hit her on the head. The head injury was not severe, but as a result of the sudden hit, her steps faltered and she fell, and got scratches on her legs and arms. She decided to go to the nearby hospital and get her wounds dressed. On the way, she got hit by a speeding vehicle that was travelling well above the permissible speed limit. Does Rania have a remedy against the driver of the vehicle?a)Yes, since she had not consented to being hit by a vehicleb)Yes, because rash and negligent driving is an offencec)No, because Rania should have asked someone for help and not gone aloned)No, because she was lost in her boyfriend’s thought as she was crossing the roadCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE:Under an established tort law, a person has no legal remedy for an injury caused to him, by an act to which he has himself consented, expressly or impliedly.FACTS: Every evening, Rania Mirza went to the Tennis Institute near her home to practice tennis. On one such evening, as she walked into the academy, she was looking at the ground, lost in her thoughts. Suddenly, a tennis ball came flying from the court and hit her on the head. The head injury was not severe, but as a result of the sudden hit, her steps faltered and she fell, and got scratches on her legs and arms. She decided to go to the nearby hospital and get her wounds dressed. On the way, she got hit by a speeding vehicle that was travelling well above the permissible speed limit. Does Rania have a remedy against the driver of the vehicle?a)Yes, since she had not consented to being hit by a vehicleb)Yes, because rash and negligent driving is an offencec)No, because Rania should have asked someone for help and not gone aloned)No, because she was lost in her boyfriend’s thought as she was crossing the roadCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for PRINCIPLE:Under an established tort law, a person has no legal remedy for an injury caused to him, by an act to which he has himself consented, expressly or impliedly.FACTS: Every evening, Rania Mirza went to the Tennis Institute near her home to practice tennis. On one such evening, as she walked into the academy, she was looking at the ground, lost in her thoughts. Suddenly, a tennis ball came flying from the court and hit her on the head. The head injury was not severe, but as a result of the sudden hit, her steps faltered and she fell, and got scratches on her legs and arms. She decided to go to the nearby hospital and get her wounds dressed. On the way, she got hit by a speeding vehicle that was travelling well above the permissible speed limit. Does Rania have a remedy against the driver of the vehicle?a)Yes, since she had not consented to being hit by a vehicleb)Yes, because rash and negligent driving is an offencec)No, because Rania should have asked someone for help and not gone aloned)No, because she was lost in her boyfriend’s thought as she was crossing the roadCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of PRINCIPLE:Under an established tort law, a person has no legal remedy for an injury caused to him, by an act to which he has himself consented, expressly or impliedly.FACTS: Every evening, Rania Mirza went to the Tennis Institute near her home to practice tennis. On one such evening, as she walked into the academy, she was looking at the ground, lost in her thoughts. Suddenly, a tennis ball came flying from the court and hit her on the head. The head injury was not severe, but as a result of the sudden hit, her steps faltered and she fell, and got scratches on her legs and arms. She decided to go to the nearby hospital and get her wounds dressed. On the way, she got hit by a speeding vehicle that was travelling well above the permissible speed limit. Does Rania have a remedy against the driver of the vehicle?a)Yes, since she had not consented to being hit by a vehicleb)Yes, because rash and negligent driving is an offencec)No, because Rania should have asked someone for help and not gone aloned)No, because she was lost in her boyfriend’s thought as she was crossing the roadCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PRINCIPLE:Under an established tort law, a person has no legal remedy for an injury caused to him, by an act to which he has himself consented, expressly or impliedly.FACTS: Every evening, Rania Mirza went to the Tennis Institute near her home to practice tennis. On one such evening, as she walked into the academy, she was looking at the ground, lost in her thoughts. Suddenly, a tennis ball came flying from the court and hit her on the head. The head injury was not severe, but as a result of the sudden hit, her steps faltered and she fell, and got scratches on her legs and arms. She decided to go to the nearby hospital and get her wounds dressed. On the way, she got hit by a speeding vehicle that was travelling well above the permissible speed limit. Does Rania have a remedy against the driver of the vehicle?a)Yes, since she had not consented to being hit by a vehicleb)Yes, because rash and negligent driving is an offencec)No, because Rania should have asked someone for help and not gone aloned)No, because she was lost in her boyfriend’s thought as she was crossing the roadCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PRINCIPLE:Under an established tort law, a person has no legal remedy for an injury caused to him, by an act to which he has himself consented, expressly or impliedly.FACTS: Every evening, Rania Mirza went to the Tennis Institute near her home to practice tennis. On one such evening, as she walked into the academy, she was looking at the ground, lost in her thoughts. Suddenly, a tennis ball came flying from the court and hit her on the head. The head injury was not severe, but as a result of the sudden hit, her steps faltered and she fell, and got scratches on her legs and arms. She decided to go to the nearby hospital and get her wounds dressed. On the way, she got hit by a speeding vehicle that was travelling well above the permissible speed limit. Does Rania have a remedy against the driver of the vehicle?a)Yes, since she had not consented to being hit by a vehicleb)Yes, because rash and negligent driving is an offencec)No, because Rania should have asked someone for help and not gone aloned)No, because she was lost in her boyfriend’s thought as she was crossing the roadCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PRINCIPLE:Under an established tort law, a person has no legal remedy for an injury caused to him, by an act to which he has himself consented, expressly or impliedly.FACTS: Every evening, Rania Mirza went to the Tennis Institute near her home to practice tennis. On one such evening, as she walked into the academy, she was looking at the ground, lost in her thoughts. Suddenly, a tennis ball came flying from the court and hit her on the head. The head injury was not severe, but as a result of the sudden hit, her steps faltered and she fell, and got scratches on her legs and arms. She decided to go to the nearby hospital and get her wounds dressed. On the way, she got hit by a speeding vehicle that was travelling well above the permissible speed limit. Does Rania have a remedy against the driver of the vehicle?a)Yes, since she had not consented to being hit by a vehicleb)Yes, because rash and negligent driving is an offencec)No, because Rania should have asked someone for help and not gone aloned)No, because she was lost in her boyfriend’s thought as she was crossing the roadCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PRINCIPLE:Under an established tort law, a person has no legal remedy for an injury caused to him, by an act to which he has himself consented, expressly or impliedly.FACTS: Every evening, Rania Mirza went to the Tennis Institute near her home to practice tennis. On one such evening, as she walked into the academy, she was looking at the ground, lost in her thoughts. Suddenly, a tennis ball came flying from the court and hit her on the head. The head injury was not severe, but as a result of the sudden hit, her steps faltered and she fell, and got scratches on her legs and arms. She decided to go to the nearby hospital and get her wounds dressed. On the way, she got hit by a speeding vehicle that was travelling well above the permissible speed limit. Does Rania have a remedy against the driver of the vehicle?a)Yes, since she had not consented to being hit by a vehicleb)Yes, because rash and negligent driving is an offencec)No, because Rania should have asked someone for help and not gone aloned)No, because she was lost in her boyfriend’s thought as she was crossing the roadCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.