CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Directions: In making a decision about an imp... Start Learning for Free
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.


Statement: Should there be a total ban on use of plastic bags?


Arguments:


I. No, instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.


II. Yes, use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and water-logging and hence it is necessary to ban it. 

  • a)
    if only argument I is strong

  • b)
    if only argument II is strong.

  • c)
    if either argument I or II is strong.

  • d)
    if neither argument I nor II is strong.

  • e)
    if both arguments I and II are strong

Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is de...
The correct option is E
If both I and II are strong
Argument I is strong as it takes a wise, reconciliatory approach to the problem. Argument II is also strong as water pollution, etc. may severally harm mankind.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is de...
Argument Analysis:

Argument I:
- This argument suggests that instead of a total ban on plastic bags, the focus should be on specifying the thickness of plastic bags that can be used without causing significant harm to the environment.
- This argument acknowledges the practical use of plastic bags but emphasizes the need for regulation to minimize environmental damage.

Argument II:
- This argument advocates for a total ban on plastic bags due to the various problems they cause, such as water pollution and water-logging.
- It highlights the negative impact of plastic bags on the environment and argues for a drastic measure to address these issues.

Evaluation:
- Both arguments present valid points regarding the use of plastic bags and its impact on the environment.
- Argument I focuses on regulation and control, suggesting a nuanced approach to address the issue.
- Argument II takes a more drastic stance, calling for a complete ban to tackle the environmental problems caused by plastic bags.
- Considering the severity of environmental issues associated with plastic bags, a combination of regulation and prohibition might be the most effective solution.
Therefore, both arguments I and II are strong as they offer different perspectives on how to address the problem of plastic bag usage, with each argument providing valid reasoning for its position.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Question Description
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be a total ban on use of plastic bags?Arguments:I. No, instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.II. Yes, use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and water-logging and hence it is necessary to ban it.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be a total ban on use of plastic bags?Arguments:I. No, instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.II. Yes, use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and water-logging and hence it is necessary to ban it.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be a total ban on use of plastic bags?Arguments:I. No, instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.II. Yes, use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and water-logging and hence it is necessary to ban it.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be a total ban on use of plastic bags?Arguments:I. No, instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.II. Yes, use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and water-logging and hence it is necessary to ban it.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be a total ban on use of plastic bags?Arguments:I. No, instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.II. Yes, use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and water-logging and hence it is necessary to ban it.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be a total ban on use of plastic bags?Arguments:I. No, instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.II. Yes, use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and water-logging and hence it is necessary to ban it.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be a total ban on use of plastic bags?Arguments:I. No, instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.II. Yes, use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and water-logging and hence it is necessary to ban it.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be a total ban on use of plastic bags?Arguments:I. No, instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.II. Yes, use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and water-logging and hence it is necessary to ban it.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be a total ban on use of plastic bags?Arguments:I. No, instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.II. Yes, use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and water-logging and hence it is necessary to ban it.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev