CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Principles 1:Any person who interferes with t...
Start Learning for Free
Principles 1: Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.
Principles 2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)
Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.
Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?
Principles 2: Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)
Facts: Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.
Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?
- a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.
- b)Either A or C
- c)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.
- d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by...
The Defense of Intoxication is available in the Indian Penal Code when the said state is not caused by voluntary Act. Krishna Drunk on his volition and hence his Act is punishable.
Most Upvoted Answer
Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by...
Explanation:
Principle 1: According to the first principle, any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment. This means that if someone assaults a policeman while he is performing his duty, they can be held accountable for their actions.
Principle 2: However, the second principle states that intoxication can be a defense if the person was unable to appreciate the consequences of their actions. In this case, the intoxication must have been administered against the person's will and without their consent.
Analysis: In the given scenario, Krishna got drunk of his own volition and then proceeded to assault a policeman. Since he willingly consumed alcohol and chose to become intoxicated, he cannot claim that he was not aware of the consequences of his actions. Therefore, according to the principles provided, Krishna is liable for punishment for intimidating a public servant.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D' - Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition.
Principle 1: According to the first principle, any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment. This means that if someone assaults a policeman while he is performing his duty, they can be held accountable for their actions.
Principle 2: However, the second principle states that intoxication can be a defense if the person was unable to appreciate the consequences of their actions. In this case, the intoxication must have been administered against the person's will and without their consent.
Analysis: In the given scenario, Krishna got drunk of his own volition and then proceeded to assault a policeman. Since he willingly consumed alcohol and chose to become intoxicated, he cannot claim that he was not aware of the consequences of his actions. Therefore, according to the principles provided, Krishna is liable for punishment for intimidating a public servant.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D' - Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volition.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2:Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts:Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)Either A or Cc)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2:Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts:Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)Either A or Cc)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2:Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts:Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)Either A or Cc)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2:Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts:Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)Either A or Cc)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2:Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts:Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)Either A or Cc)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2:Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts:Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)Either A or Cc)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2:Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts:Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)Either A or Cc)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2:Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts:Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)Either A or Cc)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2:Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts:Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)Either A or Cc)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2:Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts:Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)Either A or Cc)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2:Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts:Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)Either A or Cc)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2:Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts:Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)Either A or Cc)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principles 1:Any person who interferes with the discharge of duties by a public servant is liable for punishment.Principles 2:Nothing is an offence if the person who committed it was winnable to appreciate the consequences of his act, due to intoxication, provided such intoxication was administered against his will and without his consent. (NLS 1990)Facts:Krishna got drunk of his own volition and on his way back home he assaulted a policeman. He is prosecuted for intimidating a public servant.Is Mr. Krishna liable for punishment"?a)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he assaulted a policeman.b)Either A or Cc)No, Krishna is not liable for punishment as he was drunk.d)Yes, Krishna is liable for punishment as he got drunk of his own volitionCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup