Why Indian National Congress (INC) leaders were not satisfied with th...
- Cripps was sent to negotiate an agreement with the nationalist leaders, speaking for the majority Indians, and Muhammad Ali Jinnah, speaking for the minority Muslim population.
- Cripps discussed the proposals with the Indian leaders and published them.
- Cripps worked to keep India loyal to the British war effort in exchange for a promise of full self-government after the war. Cripps promised to give dominion status after the war and elections to be held after the war.
- Both the major parties, the Congress and the League, rejected his proposals and the mission proved a failure.
View all questions of this test
Why Indian National Congress (INC) leaders were not satisfied with th...
The correct answer is option 'C': Leaders wanted full independence rather than a dominion status.
Explanation:
1. Introduction:
The Cripps Mission was a British delegation led by Sir Stafford Cripps that arrived in India in March 1942. Its purpose was to negotiate with Indian leaders and offer a political settlement in exchange for their support in the war effort against the Axis powers. However, the Indian National Congress (INC) leaders were not satisfied with the proposals put forth by the mission.
2. Demand for full independence:
a) The INC leaders, under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi, had been demanding complete independence from British rule. They wanted India to be a sovereign nation with the right to determine its own political and economic future.
b) The Cripps Mission, on the other hand, proposed a dominion status for India within the British Commonwealth. This meant that while India would have self-governance, it would still be a part of the British Empire.
c) The INC leaders believed that a dominion status fell short of their aspirations for full independence and self-determination. They saw it as a continuation of British control over India, albeit in a different form.
3. Lack of consultation with Indian leaders:
a) Another reason for the dissatisfaction of the INC leaders was the lack of meaningful consultation during the negotiations with the Cripps Mission. The proposals were presented as a take-it-or-leave-it offer without much scope for discussion or input from the Indian leaders.
b) The mission did not involve the Indian leaders in the drafting of the proposals or consider their perspectives on key issues. This lack of consultation further undermined the credibility of the proposals in the eyes of the INC leaders.
4. Failure to address key concerns:
a) The Cripps Mission failed to address some of the key concerns of the INC leaders. One such concern was the issue of separate electorates, which had been a contentious issue in Indian politics.
b) The mission did not provide a clear solution to the demand for the abolition of separate electorates, which the INC leaders saw as a hindrance to national unity and the representation of all communities in a unified India.
5. Conclusion:
In conclusion, the INC leaders were not satisfied with the Cripps Mission proposals primarily because they fell short of their demand for full independence. The proposals offered a dominion status within the British Commonwealth and did not address key issues or involve meaningful consultation with Indian leaders. The INC leaders wanted complete freedom from British rule and the right to determine their own destiny, which the Cripps Mission failed to deliver.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.