CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Analyse the following caselet and answer the ... Start Learning for Free
Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:
Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors' were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.
The director still wanted to persuade the government to review its stand. He had framed the following arguments:
1. Most famous researchers in the world are also the highest paid.
2. American institute of research gives extra benefits to its scientists.
3. This year's highest paid researcher had won the Nobel Prize last year.
Q. Considering the Government to be reasonable which of the following options is UNLIKELY to convince the Government?
  • a)
    1 and 2
  • b)
    2 only
  • c)
    2 and 3
  • d)
    1 and 3
  • e)
    1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Ind...
That most famous researchers are also paid high does not imply that the highest paid researchers are always famous or that they will be productive. If an American Institute is giving extra benefits, it does not mean IIR should also follow it. The researcher may be getting the highest pay as a consequence of receiving the Nobel Prize, or there may be other reasons for the researcher to be highest paid. Hence E is the correct option.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Ind...
Analysis of the Arguments
To understand why option 'E' is the correct answer, we need to evaluate the arguments presented by the director against the government’s perspective.
Argument 1: Famous Researchers are Highly Paid
- This argument suggests that higher remuneration attracts top talent.
- However, the government may argue that recognition and prestige associated with research are sufficient compensation.
- Thus, this argument may not hold substantial weight in convincing the government.
Argument 2: American Institute's Practices
- Pointing to practices of an American institute may not resonate well with the government.
- The government likely seeks to maintain a distinct approach and may disregard foreign practices as irrelevant to India's context.
- This argument is less likely to persuade, as it does not address the unique challenges or values of the Indian research ecosystem.
Argument 3: Nobel Prize Winning Researcher
- Citing the highest-paid researcher who won a Nobel Prize could indicate that financial rewards correlate with exceptional contributions.
- However, the government’s stance is that publishing is its own reward, making this argument less compelling.
- The government may perceive this as an isolated case rather than a justification for a broader remuneration policy.
Conclusion
Considering the government’s perspective, all three arguments presented by the director are weak in convincing them to change their stance on extra remuneration for researchers.
- Option E (1, 2, and 3) is correct as all arguments are unlikely to sway a reasonable government focused on cost-effectiveness and intrinsic motivation in research.
In summary, none of the arguments effectively align with the government's rationale, making them unlikely to convince decision-makers.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The following facts were observed by an analytics team hired by the government to study the extant situation.1. There was a four-fold increase in the number of researchers leaving the organization in 2014.2. A researcher died while on duty.3. The quality of articles published declined substantially.4. The average number of people accessing an article decreased by 2%.Q. Which of the following options would justify the governments intention to DISCONTINUE the scheme?

Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director wanted to promote good decision making at Indian Institute of Research. A few trusted colleagues offered the following suggestions:1. Auditors need not be allowed to object to extra benefits schemes.2. Auditors need not pin-point sudden increase in expenditure.3. Auditors need not be consulted before taking any policy level decision.Q. Which of the following combination of options should the director agree THE MOST with?

Top Courses for CAT

Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director still wanted to persuade the government to review its stand. He had framed the following arguments:1. Most famous researchers in the world are also the highest paid.2. American institute of research gives extra benefits to its scientists.3. This years highest paid researcher had won the Nobel Prize last year.Q. Considering the Government to be reasonable which of the following options is UNLIKELY to convince the Government?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director still wanted to persuade the government to review its stand. He had framed the following arguments:1. Most famous researchers in the world are also the highest paid.2. American institute of research gives extra benefits to its scientists.3. This years highest paid researcher had won the Nobel Prize last year.Q. Considering the Government to be reasonable which of the following options is UNLIKELY to convince the Government?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director still wanted to persuade the government to review its stand. He had framed the following arguments:1. Most famous researchers in the world are also the highest paid.2. American institute of research gives extra benefits to its scientists.3. This years highest paid researcher had won the Nobel Prize last year.Q. Considering the Government to be reasonable which of the following options is UNLIKELY to convince the Government?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director still wanted to persuade the government to review its stand. He had framed the following arguments:1. Most famous researchers in the world are also the highest paid.2. American institute of research gives extra benefits to its scientists.3. This years highest paid researcher had won the Nobel Prize last year.Q. Considering the Government to be reasonable which of the following options is UNLIKELY to convince the Government?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director still wanted to persuade the government to review its stand. He had framed the following arguments:1. Most famous researchers in the world are also the highest paid.2. American institute of research gives extra benefits to its scientists.3. This years highest paid researcher had won the Nobel Prize last year.Q. Considering the Government to be reasonable which of the following options is UNLIKELY to convince the Government?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director still wanted to persuade the government to review its stand. He had framed the following arguments:1. Most famous researchers in the world are also the highest paid.2. American institute of research gives extra benefits to its scientists.3. This years highest paid researcher had won the Nobel Prize last year.Q. Considering the Government to be reasonable which of the following options is UNLIKELY to convince the Government?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director still wanted to persuade the government to review its stand. He had framed the following arguments:1. Most famous researchers in the world are also the highest paid.2. American institute of research gives extra benefits to its scientists.3. This years highest paid researcher had won the Nobel Prize last year.Q. Considering the Government to be reasonable which of the following options is UNLIKELY to convince the Government?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director still wanted to persuade the government to review its stand. He had framed the following arguments:1. Most famous researchers in the world are also the highest paid.2. American institute of research gives extra benefits to its scientists.3. This years highest paid researcher had won the Nobel Prize last year.Q. Considering the Government to be reasonable which of the following options is UNLIKELY to convince the Government?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director still wanted to persuade the government to review its stand. He had framed the following arguments:1. Most famous researchers in the world are also the highest paid.2. American institute of research gives extra benefits to its scientists.3. This years highest paid researcher had won the Nobel Prize last year.Q. Considering the Government to be reasonable which of the following options is UNLIKELY to convince the Government?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director still wanted to persuade the government to review its stand. He had framed the following arguments:1. Most famous researchers in the world are also the highest paid.2. American institute of research gives extra benefits to its scientists.3. This years highest paid researcher had won the Nobel Prize last year.Q. Considering the Government to be reasonable which of the following options is UNLIKELY to convince the Government?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev