Question Description
Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director wanted to promote good decision making at Indian Institute of Research. A few trusted colleagues offered the following suggestions:1. Auditors need not be allowed to object to extra benefits schemes.2. Auditors need not pin-point sudden increase in expenditure.3. Auditors need not be consulted before taking any policy level decision.Q. Which of the following combination of options should the director agree THE MOST with?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director wanted to promote good decision making at Indian Institute of Research. A few trusted colleagues offered the following suggestions:1. Auditors need not be allowed to object to extra benefits schemes.2. Auditors need not pin-point sudden increase in expenditure.3. Auditors need not be consulted before taking any policy level decision.Q. Which of the following combination of options should the director agree THE MOST with?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director wanted to promote good decision making at Indian Institute of Research. A few trusted colleagues offered the following suggestions:1. Auditors need not be allowed to object to extra benefits schemes.2. Auditors need not pin-point sudden increase in expenditure.3. Auditors need not be consulted before taking any policy level decision.Q. Which of the following combination of options should the director agree THE MOST with?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director wanted to promote good decision making at Indian Institute of Research. A few trusted colleagues offered the following suggestions:1. Auditors need not be allowed to object to extra benefits schemes.2. Auditors need not pin-point sudden increase in expenditure.3. Auditors need not be consulted before taking any policy level decision.Q. Which of the following combination of options should the director agree THE MOST with?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director wanted to promote good decision making at Indian Institute of Research. A few trusted colleagues offered the following suggestions:1. Auditors need not be allowed to object to extra benefits schemes.2. Auditors need not pin-point sudden increase in expenditure.3. Auditors need not be consulted before taking any policy level decision.Q. Which of the following combination of options should the director agree THE MOST with?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director wanted to promote good decision making at Indian Institute of Research. A few trusted colleagues offered the following suggestions:1. Auditors need not be allowed to object to extra benefits schemes.2. Auditors need not pin-point sudden increase in expenditure.3. Auditors need not be consulted before taking any policy level decision.Q. Which of the following combination of options should the director agree THE MOST with?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director wanted to promote good decision making at Indian Institute of Research. A few trusted colleagues offered the following suggestions:1. Auditors need not be allowed to object to extra benefits schemes.2. Auditors need not pin-point sudden increase in expenditure.3. Auditors need not be consulted before taking any policy level decision.Q. Which of the following combination of options should the director agree THE MOST with?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director wanted to promote good decision making at Indian Institute of Research. A few trusted colleagues offered the following suggestions:1. Auditors need not be allowed to object to extra benefits schemes.2. Auditors need not pin-point sudden increase in expenditure.3. Auditors need not be consulted before taking any policy level decision.Q. Which of the following combination of options should the director agree THE MOST with?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against the new benefits scheme. Auditors were not happy with increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.The director wanted to promote good decision making at Indian Institute of Research. A few trusted colleagues offered the following suggestions:1. Auditors need not be allowed to object to extra benefits schemes.2. Auditors need not pin-point sudden increase in expenditure.3. Auditors need not be consulted before taking any policy level decision.Q. Which of the following combination of options should the director agree THE MOST with?a)1 and 2b)2 onlyc)2 and 3d)1 and 3e)1, 2 and 3Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.