Question Description
Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.