CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to... Start Learning for Free
Principle:
I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.
II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.
III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.
Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.
Which of the following statements is correct?
  • a)
    Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.
  • b)
    The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.
  • c)
    Both (a) and (b).
  • d)
    Neither (a) nor (b).
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into ...
As per principle (i), in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified while in the instant case, Thomas did not accept the proposal unconditionally and absolutely to convert it into a promise. Thus, no one who contacts Gareth first is bound by contract to buy them, nor does Thomas’ mail convert the proposal into a promise.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into ...

Explanation:

Contract Law Principles:
- Principle I: In contract law, acceptance must be absolute and unqualified to convert a proposal into a promise.
- Principle II: Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless agreed to by the offeror.
- Principle III: A counter-offer terminates the original offer and cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.

Application to the Facts:
- Gareth's advertisement was a proposal to sell the shoes for $100.
- Thomas' mail offering to buy the shoes at a reduced price constitutes a counter-offer.
- Since Thomas's offer was a counter-offer and not an absolute and unqualified acceptance of Gareth's proposal, there is no binding contract between them.
- Therefore, neither statement (a) nor statement (b) is correct.

By applying the principles of contract law, we can conclude that the correct answer is option 'D' - Neither (a) nor (b).
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: You have been given some passages followd by questions based on each passage. You are required to choose the mot appropriate option which follows from the passage. Only the information given in the passage should be used for choosing the answer and no external knowledge of law howsoever prominent is to be applied.The Parliament passed the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which promises to strengthen the rights of consumers and provides a mechanism for redressal of complaints regarding defects in goods and deficiency in services.Union Food and Consumer Affairs Minister stressed that the overall purpose of the legislation was to ease the process of addressing grievances of consumers. TheAct also seeks to bring in ecommerce under their jurisdiction and hold celebrities accountable for false and misleading advertisements of products that they endorse. The Act proposed strict action against the advertiser in case of misleading advertisements but not against the media through which the advertisement is being publicised. It also provides for product liability action on account of harm caused to consumers due to defective products or deficient services.Product liability means the liability of a product manufacturer, service provider or seller to compensate a consumer for any harm or injury caused by a defective good or deficient service.Under the Act, a consumer is defined as a person who buys any good or avails a service for a consideration. It does not include a person who obtains a good for resale or a good or service for commercial purpose. It covers transactions through all modes including offline, and online through electronic means, teleshopping, multilevel marketing or direct selling. Only a consumer can bring an action under the Act.Certain consumer rights have been defined in the Act, including the right to: (i) be protected against marketing of goods and services which are hazardous to life and property; (ii) be informed of the quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard and price of goods or services; (iii) be assured of access to a variety of goods or services at competitive prices; and (iv) seek redressal against unfair or restrictive trade practices.The central government will set up a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCP

The Parliament passed the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which promises to strengthen the rights of consumers and provides a mechanism for redressal of complaints regarding defects in goods and deficiency in services.Union Food and Consumer Affairs Minister stressed that the overall purpose of the legislation was to ease the process of addressing grievances of consumers.TheAct also seeks to bring in e-commerce under their jurisdiction and hold celebrities accountable for false and misleading advertisements of products that they endorse.The Act proposed strict action against the advertiser in case of misleading advertisements but not against the media through which the advertisement is being publicised. It also provides for product liability action on account of harm caused to consumers due to defective products or deficient services.Product liability means the liability of a product manufacturer, service provider or seller to compensate a consumer for any harm or injury caused by a defective good or deficient service.Under the Act, a consumer is defined as a person who buys any good or avails a service for a consideration.It does not include a person who obtains a good for resale or a good or service for commercial purpose. It covers transactions through all modes including offline, and online through electronic means, teleshopping, multilevel marketing or direct selling. Only a consumer can bring an action under the Act. Certain consumer rights have been defined in the Act, including the right to: (i) be protected against marketing of goods and services which are hazardous to life and property; (ii) be informed of the quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard and price of goods or services; (iii) be assured of access to a variety of goods or services at competitive prices; and (iv) seek redressal against unfair or restrictive trade practices.The central government will set up a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCP

Direction: You have been given some passages followd by questions based on each passage. You are required to choose the mot appropriate option which follows from the passage. Only the information given in the passage should be used for choosing the answer and no external knowledge of law howsoever prominent is to be applied.The Parliament passed the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which promises to strengthen the rights of consumers and provides a mechanism for redressal of complaints regarding defects in goods and deficiency in services.Union Food and Consumer Affairs Minister stressed that the overall purpose of the legislation was to ease the process of addressing grievances of consumers. TheAct also seeks to bring in ecommerce under their jurisdiction and hold celebrities accountable for false and misleading advertisements of products that they endorse. The Act proposed strict action against the advertiser in case of misleading advertisements but not against the media through which the advertisement is being publicised. It also provides for product liability action on account of harm caused to consumers due to defective products or deficient services.Product liability means the liability of a product manufacturer, service provider or seller to compensate a consumer for any harm or injury caused by a defective good or deficient service.Under the Act, a consumer is defined as a person who buys any good or avails a service for a consideration. It does not include a person who obtains a good for resale or a good or service for commercial purpose. It covers transactions through all modes including offline, and online through electronic means, teleshopping, multilevel marketing or direct selling. Only a consumer can bring an action under the Act.Certain consumer rights have been defined in the Act, including the right to: (i) be protected against marketing of goods and services which are hazardous to life and property; (ii) be informed of the quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard and price of goods or services; (iii) be assured of access to a variety of goods or services at competitive prices; and (iv) seek redressal against unfair or restrictive trade practices.The central government will set up a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCP

The Parliament passed the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which promises to strengthen the rights of consumers and provides a mechanism for redressal of complaints regarding defects in goods and deficiency in services.Union Food and Consumer Affairs Minister stressed that the overall purpose of the legislation was to ease the process of addressing grievances of consumers.TheAct also seeks to bring in e-commerce under their jurisdiction and hold celebrities accountable for false and misleading advertisements of products that they endorse.The Act proposed strict action against the advertiser in case of misleading advertisements but not against the media through which the advertisement is being publicised. It also provides for product liability action on account of harm caused to consumers due to defective products or deficient services.Product liability means the liability of a product manufacturer, service provider or seller to compensate a consumer for any harm or injury caused by a defective good or deficient service.Under the Act, a consumer is defined as a person who buys any good or avails a service for a consideration.It does not include a person who obtains a good for resale or a good or service for commercial purpose. It covers transactions through all modes including offline, and online through electronic means, teleshopping, multilevel marketing or direct selling. Only a consumer can bring an action under the Act. Certain consumer rights have been defined in the Act, including the right to: (i) be protected against marketing of goods and services which are hazardous to life and property; (ii) be informed of the quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard and price of goods or services; (iii) be assured of access to a variety of goods or services at competitive prices; and (iv) seek redressal against unfair or restrictive trade practices.The central government will set up a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCP

Top Courses for CLAT

Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance.Facts: Gareth bought expensive new studs for $120 for his soccer match in school. The shopkeeper told him that they were the best available in the market. However, he later found that he had, in fact, bought an older model and better ones were available online. He decided to sell the shoes online and buy better ones. He put up an advertisement with a picture of the shoes, stating, “Brand new pair of football shoes on sale for $100. Please contact me if interested.” Thomas mails Gareth offering to buy the shoes provided he reduces the price further.Which of the following statements is correct?a) Anyone who contacts Gareth regarding the shoes first would be bound by contract to buy them.b) The advertisement by Gareth constitutes a proposal, and Thomas’ mail converted it into a promise.c) Both (a) and (b).d) Neither (a) nor (b).Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev