Question Description
Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance. Gareth refuses to lower the price of the shoes. Thomas finally consents to buy the shoes at the originally set price of $100.a)Gareth is bound by contract law to sell the shoes to Thomas for $100.b)Thomas’ mail to Gareth was in the nature of a counter-offer.c)The original offer by Gareth is still subsisting until Gareth puts an end to it.d)Gareth cannot sell the shoes to a third party over Thomas.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance. Gareth refuses to lower the price of the shoes. Thomas finally consents to buy the shoes at the originally set price of $100.a)Gareth is bound by contract law to sell the shoes to Thomas for $100.b)Thomas’ mail to Gareth was in the nature of a counter-offer.c)The original offer by Gareth is still subsisting until Gareth puts an end to it.d)Gareth cannot sell the shoes to a third party over Thomas.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance. Gareth refuses to lower the price of the shoes. Thomas finally consents to buy the shoes at the originally set price of $100.a)Gareth is bound by contract law to sell the shoes to Thomas for $100.b)Thomas’ mail to Gareth was in the nature of a counter-offer.c)The original offer by Gareth is still subsisting until Gareth puts an end to it.d)Gareth cannot sell the shoes to a third party over Thomas.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance. Gareth refuses to lower the price of the shoes. Thomas finally consents to buy the shoes at the originally set price of $100.a)Gareth is bound by contract law to sell the shoes to Thomas for $100.b)Thomas’ mail to Gareth was in the nature of a counter-offer.c)The original offer by Gareth is still subsisting until Gareth puts an end to it.d)Gareth cannot sell the shoes to a third party over Thomas.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance. Gareth refuses to lower the price of the shoes. Thomas finally consents to buy the shoes at the originally set price of $100.a)Gareth is bound by contract law to sell the shoes to Thomas for $100.b)Thomas’ mail to Gareth was in the nature of a counter-offer.c)The original offer by Gareth is still subsisting until Gareth puts an end to it.d)Gareth cannot sell the shoes to a third party over Thomas.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance. Gareth refuses to lower the price of the shoes. Thomas finally consents to buy the shoes at the originally set price of $100.a)Gareth is bound by contract law to sell the shoes to Thomas for $100.b)Thomas’ mail to Gareth was in the nature of a counter-offer.c)The original offer by Gareth is still subsisting until Gareth puts an end to it.d)Gareth cannot sell the shoes to a third party over Thomas.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance. Gareth refuses to lower the price of the shoes. Thomas finally consents to buy the shoes at the originally set price of $100.a)Gareth is bound by contract law to sell the shoes to Thomas for $100.b)Thomas’ mail to Gareth was in the nature of a counter-offer.c)The original offer by Gareth is still subsisting until Gareth puts an end to it.d)Gareth cannot sell the shoes to a third party over Thomas.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance. Gareth refuses to lower the price of the shoes. Thomas finally consents to buy the shoes at the originally set price of $100.a)Gareth is bound by contract law to sell the shoes to Thomas for $100.b)Thomas’ mail to Gareth was in the nature of a counter-offer.c)The original offer by Gareth is still subsisting until Gareth puts an end to it.d)Gareth cannot sell the shoes to a third party over Thomas.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance. Gareth refuses to lower the price of the shoes. Thomas finally consents to buy the shoes at the originally set price of $100.a)Gareth is bound by contract law to sell the shoes to Thomas for $100.b)Thomas’ mail to Gareth was in the nature of a counter-offer.c)The original offer by Gareth is still subsisting until Gareth puts an end to it.d)Gareth cannot sell the shoes to a third party over Thomas.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.