Question Description
Principle:I. An ultrahazardous activity under the law of torts is one that is so inherently dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, even if the person engaged in the activity took every reasonable precaution to prevent others from being injured.II. Keeping of domesticated animals that have a known propensity for dangerous behaviour comes under an ultrahazardous activity.III. A person who is injured by one of these ultrahazardous activities while trespassing on the property of the person engaged in the activity is barred from suing under a strict liability theory.Facts:Toshi was an agricultural scientist. He was experimenting with some radioactive substances to detect their effect on crop growth etc. He disposed of the plants he used for the tests in the dumpster in the park in the neighbourhood. Toshi was very particular about the security of his house. He had kept a dog. The dog had a tendency to attack and bite people and had bitten a couple of the neighbours’ children before. One day, some of the children from the neighbourhood were playing in the park and one of them accidentally knocked off the dumpster. The children began to cough as fumes from the plants Toshi had discarded, were inhaled by them. The neighbours were furious at this. The society welfare officer, Ramakant, went to speak with Toshi immediately. But, as he entered the house, Toshi’s pet dog bit him.Choose the correct statement from the following:a)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist.b)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist but not to dispose of the test plants in the dumpster in the neighbourhood park.c)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since all his actions were done in good faith.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle:I. An ultrahazardous activity under the law of torts is one that is so inherently dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, even if the person engaged in the activity took every reasonable precaution to prevent others from being injured.II. Keeping of domesticated animals that have a known propensity for dangerous behaviour comes under an ultrahazardous activity.III. A person who is injured by one of these ultrahazardous activities while trespassing on the property of the person engaged in the activity is barred from suing under a strict liability theory.Facts:Toshi was an agricultural scientist. He was experimenting with some radioactive substances to detect their effect on crop growth etc. He disposed of the plants he used for the tests in the dumpster in the park in the neighbourhood. Toshi was very particular about the security of his house. He had kept a dog. The dog had a tendency to attack and bite people and had bitten a couple of the neighbours’ children before. One day, some of the children from the neighbourhood were playing in the park and one of them accidentally knocked off the dumpster. The children began to cough as fumes from the plants Toshi had discarded, were inhaled by them. The neighbours were furious at this. The society welfare officer, Ramakant, went to speak with Toshi immediately. But, as he entered the house, Toshi’s pet dog bit him.Choose the correct statement from the following:a)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist.b)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist but not to dispose of the test plants in the dumpster in the neighbourhood park.c)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since all his actions were done in good faith.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle:I. An ultrahazardous activity under the law of torts is one that is so inherently dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, even if the person engaged in the activity took every reasonable precaution to prevent others from being injured.II. Keeping of domesticated animals that have a known propensity for dangerous behaviour comes under an ultrahazardous activity.III. A person who is injured by one of these ultrahazardous activities while trespassing on the property of the person engaged in the activity is barred from suing under a strict liability theory.Facts:Toshi was an agricultural scientist. He was experimenting with some radioactive substances to detect their effect on crop growth etc. He disposed of the plants he used for the tests in the dumpster in the park in the neighbourhood. Toshi was very particular about the security of his house. He had kept a dog. The dog had a tendency to attack and bite people and had bitten a couple of the neighbours’ children before. One day, some of the children from the neighbourhood were playing in the park and one of them accidentally knocked off the dumpster. The children began to cough as fumes from the plants Toshi had discarded, were inhaled by them. The neighbours were furious at this. The society welfare officer, Ramakant, went to speak with Toshi immediately. But, as he entered the house, Toshi’s pet dog bit him.Choose the correct statement from the following:a)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist.b)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist but not to dispose of the test plants in the dumpster in the neighbourhood park.c)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since all his actions were done in good faith.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle:I. An ultrahazardous activity under the law of torts is one that is so inherently dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, even if the person engaged in the activity took every reasonable precaution to prevent others from being injured.II. Keeping of domesticated animals that have a known propensity for dangerous behaviour comes under an ultrahazardous activity.III. A person who is injured by one of these ultrahazardous activities while trespassing on the property of the person engaged in the activity is barred from suing under a strict liability theory.Facts:Toshi was an agricultural scientist. He was experimenting with some radioactive substances to detect their effect on crop growth etc. He disposed of the plants he used for the tests in the dumpster in the park in the neighbourhood. Toshi was very particular about the security of his house. He had kept a dog. The dog had a tendency to attack and bite people and had bitten a couple of the neighbours’ children before. One day, some of the children from the neighbourhood were playing in the park and one of them accidentally knocked off the dumpster. The children began to cough as fumes from the plants Toshi had discarded, were inhaled by them. The neighbours were furious at this. The society welfare officer, Ramakant, went to speak with Toshi immediately. But, as he entered the house, Toshi’s pet dog bit him.Choose the correct statement from the following:a)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist.b)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist but not to dispose of the test plants in the dumpster in the neighbourhood park.c)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since all his actions were done in good faith.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle:I. An ultrahazardous activity under the law of torts is one that is so inherently dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, even if the person engaged in the activity took every reasonable precaution to prevent others from being injured.II. Keeping of domesticated animals that have a known propensity for dangerous behaviour comes under an ultrahazardous activity.III. A person who is injured by one of these ultrahazardous activities while trespassing on the property of the person engaged in the activity is barred from suing under a strict liability theory.Facts:Toshi was an agricultural scientist. He was experimenting with some radioactive substances to detect their effect on crop growth etc. He disposed of the plants he used for the tests in the dumpster in the park in the neighbourhood. Toshi was very particular about the security of his house. He had kept a dog. The dog had a tendency to attack and bite people and had bitten a couple of the neighbours’ children before. One day, some of the children from the neighbourhood were playing in the park and one of them accidentally knocked off the dumpster. The children began to cough as fumes from the plants Toshi had discarded, were inhaled by them. The neighbours were furious at this. The society welfare officer, Ramakant, went to speak with Toshi immediately. But, as he entered the house, Toshi’s pet dog bit him.Choose the correct statement from the following:a)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist.b)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist but not to dispose of the test plants in the dumpster in the neighbourhood park.c)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since all his actions were done in good faith.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle:I. An ultrahazardous activity under the law of torts is one that is so inherently dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, even if the person engaged in the activity took every reasonable precaution to prevent others from being injured.II. Keeping of domesticated animals that have a known propensity for dangerous behaviour comes under an ultrahazardous activity.III. A person who is injured by one of these ultrahazardous activities while trespassing on the property of the person engaged in the activity is barred from suing under a strict liability theory.Facts:Toshi was an agricultural scientist. He was experimenting with some radioactive substances to detect their effect on crop growth etc. He disposed of the plants he used for the tests in the dumpster in the park in the neighbourhood. Toshi was very particular about the security of his house. He had kept a dog. The dog had a tendency to attack and bite people and had bitten a couple of the neighbours’ children before. One day, some of the children from the neighbourhood were playing in the park and one of them accidentally knocked off the dumpster. The children began to cough as fumes from the plants Toshi had discarded, were inhaled by them. The neighbours were furious at this. The society welfare officer, Ramakant, went to speak with Toshi immediately. But, as he entered the house, Toshi’s pet dog bit him.Choose the correct statement from the following:a)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist.b)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist but not to dispose of the test plants in the dumpster in the neighbourhood park.c)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since all his actions were done in good faith.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle:I. An ultrahazardous activity under the law of torts is one that is so inherently dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, even if the person engaged in the activity took every reasonable precaution to prevent others from being injured.II. Keeping of domesticated animals that have a known propensity for dangerous behaviour comes under an ultrahazardous activity.III. A person who is injured by one of these ultrahazardous activities while trespassing on the property of the person engaged in the activity is barred from suing under a strict liability theory.Facts:Toshi was an agricultural scientist. He was experimenting with some radioactive substances to detect their effect on crop growth etc. He disposed of the plants he used for the tests in the dumpster in the park in the neighbourhood. Toshi was very particular about the security of his house. He had kept a dog. The dog had a tendency to attack and bite people and had bitten a couple of the neighbours’ children before. One day, some of the children from the neighbourhood were playing in the park and one of them accidentally knocked off the dumpster. The children began to cough as fumes from the plants Toshi had discarded, were inhaled by them. The neighbours were furious at this. The society welfare officer, Ramakant, went to speak with Toshi immediately. But, as he entered the house, Toshi’s pet dog bit him.Choose the correct statement from the following:a)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist.b)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist but not to dispose of the test plants in the dumpster in the neighbourhood park.c)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since all his actions were done in good faith.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle:I. An ultrahazardous activity under the law of torts is one that is so inherently dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, even if the person engaged in the activity took every reasonable precaution to prevent others from being injured.II. Keeping of domesticated animals that have a known propensity for dangerous behaviour comes under an ultrahazardous activity.III. A person who is injured by one of these ultrahazardous activities while trespassing on the property of the person engaged in the activity is barred from suing under a strict liability theory.Facts:Toshi was an agricultural scientist. He was experimenting with some radioactive substances to detect their effect on crop growth etc. He disposed of the plants he used for the tests in the dumpster in the park in the neighbourhood. Toshi was very particular about the security of his house. He had kept a dog. The dog had a tendency to attack and bite people and had bitten a couple of the neighbours’ children before. One day, some of the children from the neighbourhood were playing in the park and one of them accidentally knocked off the dumpster. The children began to cough as fumes from the plants Toshi had discarded, were inhaled by them. The neighbours were furious at this. The society welfare officer, Ramakant, went to speak with Toshi immediately. But, as he entered the house, Toshi’s pet dog bit him.Choose the correct statement from the following:a)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist.b)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist but not to dispose of the test plants in the dumpster in the neighbourhood park.c)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since all his actions were done in good faith.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle:I. An ultrahazardous activity under the law of torts is one that is so inherently dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, even if the person engaged in the activity took every reasonable precaution to prevent others from being injured.II. Keeping of domesticated animals that have a known propensity for dangerous behaviour comes under an ultrahazardous activity.III. A person who is injured by one of these ultrahazardous activities while trespassing on the property of the person engaged in the activity is barred from suing under a strict liability theory.Facts:Toshi was an agricultural scientist. He was experimenting with some radioactive substances to detect their effect on crop growth etc. He disposed of the plants he used for the tests in the dumpster in the park in the neighbourhood. Toshi was very particular about the security of his house. He had kept a dog. The dog had a tendency to attack and bite people and had bitten a couple of the neighbours’ children before. One day, some of the children from the neighbourhood were playing in the park and one of them accidentally knocked off the dumpster. The children began to cough as fumes from the plants Toshi had discarded, were inhaled by them. The neighbours were furious at this. The society welfare officer, Ramakant, went to speak with Toshi immediately. But, as he entered the house, Toshi’s pet dog bit him.Choose the correct statement from the following:a)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist.b)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since he was an agricultural scientist but not to dispose of the test plants in the dumpster in the neighbourhood park.c)Toshi was entitled to do the experiments with radioactive substances in his house since all his actions were done in good faith.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.