CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that ...
Start Learning for Free
Principle:
I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.
II. Libel is any defamation that can be seen like writing, printing, movie, statue etc.
Facts: Meeta and Reeta are both popular actresses in the Hindi film industry. They were the best of friends. However, when Meeta was replaced by Reeta in a film, she came on the sets of the film and interrupted the shooting. She started ranting on how Reeta used to pay directors and producers in order to compel them to cast her. Following this public outburst, Reeta lost out on major endorsement deals as companies were apprehensive about her damaged reputation.
- a)Reeta can sue Meeta for libel.
- b)Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.
- c)Reeta cannot sue Meeta for none of the statements made by Meeta were published.
- d)Reeta can sue Meeta for a criminal wrong
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Li...
As per the principle given in the question, slander is a form of defamation which is spoken or heard. In the instant case, Meeta engaged in making derogatory remarks about Reeta in a public place because of which Reeta suffered professionally as well. Hence, Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Li...
Understanding Slander and Libel
In the context of defamation, it's essential to differentiate between slander and libel:
- Slander refers to spoken defamation, where false statements are made orally.
- Libel pertains to written or published defamation that can be seen, such as in print or online.
Facts of the Case
In this scenario:
- Meeta made public statements regarding Reeta's alleged unethical practices related to casting.
- These remarks were made during an interruption of a film shoot and were spoken aloud in front of others.
Why Reeta Can Sue for Slander
- Spoken Defamation: Since Meeta's comments were made verbally and were heard by others, this situation qualifies as slander.
- Impact on Reputation: Reeta's reputation suffered as a consequence of these statements, leading to significant financial losses through lost endorsement deals.
Analysis of Other Options
- Option A (Libel): This is incorrect because Meeta's statements were not written or published, thus not falling under libel.
- Option C: Reeta can indeed sue Meeta as the statements were made publicly, affecting her reputation.
- Option D: A defamation claim can be considered a tort rather than a criminal wrong, making this option incorrect as well.
Conclusion
Reeta has a valid case for slander against Meeta due to the spoken nature of the defamatory statements and the resultant harm to her reputation.
In the context of defamation, it's essential to differentiate between slander and libel:
- Slander refers to spoken defamation, where false statements are made orally.
- Libel pertains to written or published defamation that can be seen, such as in print or online.
Facts of the Case
In this scenario:
- Meeta made public statements regarding Reeta's alleged unethical practices related to casting.
- These remarks were made during an interruption of a film shoot and were spoken aloud in front of others.
Why Reeta Can Sue for Slander
- Spoken Defamation: Since Meeta's comments were made verbally and were heard by others, this situation qualifies as slander.
- Impact on Reputation: Reeta's reputation suffered as a consequence of these statements, leading to significant financial losses through lost endorsement deals.
Analysis of Other Options
- Option A (Libel): This is incorrect because Meeta's statements were not written or published, thus not falling under libel.
- Option C: Reeta can indeed sue Meeta as the statements were made publicly, affecting her reputation.
- Option D: A defamation claim can be considered a tort rather than a criminal wrong, making this option incorrect as well.
Conclusion
Reeta has a valid case for slander against Meeta due to the spoken nature of the defamatory statements and the resultant harm to her reputation.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Question Description
Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Libel is any defamation that can be seen like writing, printing, movie, statue etc.Facts: Meeta and Reeta are both popular actresses in the Hindi film industry. They were the best of friends. However, when Meeta was replaced by Reeta in a film, she came on the sets of the film and interrupted the shooting. She started ranting on how Reeta used to pay directors and producers in order to compel them to cast her. Following this public outburst, Reeta lost out on major endorsement deals as companies were apprehensive about her damaged reputation.a) Reeta can sue Meeta for libel.b) Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.c) Reeta cannot sue Meeta for none of the statements made by Meeta were published.d) Reeta can sue Meeta for a criminal wrongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Libel is any defamation that can be seen like writing, printing, movie, statue etc.Facts: Meeta and Reeta are both popular actresses in the Hindi film industry. They were the best of friends. However, when Meeta was replaced by Reeta in a film, she came on the sets of the film and interrupted the shooting. She started ranting on how Reeta used to pay directors and producers in order to compel them to cast her. Following this public outburst, Reeta lost out on major endorsement deals as companies were apprehensive about her damaged reputation.a) Reeta can sue Meeta for libel.b) Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.c) Reeta cannot sue Meeta for none of the statements made by Meeta were published.d) Reeta can sue Meeta for a criminal wrongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Libel is any defamation that can be seen like writing, printing, movie, statue etc.Facts: Meeta and Reeta are both popular actresses in the Hindi film industry. They were the best of friends. However, when Meeta was replaced by Reeta in a film, she came on the sets of the film and interrupted the shooting. She started ranting on how Reeta used to pay directors and producers in order to compel them to cast her. Following this public outburst, Reeta lost out on major endorsement deals as companies were apprehensive about her damaged reputation.a) Reeta can sue Meeta for libel.b) Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.c) Reeta cannot sue Meeta for none of the statements made by Meeta were published.d) Reeta can sue Meeta for a criminal wrongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Libel is any defamation that can be seen like writing, printing, movie, statue etc.Facts: Meeta and Reeta are both popular actresses in the Hindi film industry. They were the best of friends. However, when Meeta was replaced by Reeta in a film, she came on the sets of the film and interrupted the shooting. She started ranting on how Reeta used to pay directors and producers in order to compel them to cast her. Following this public outburst, Reeta lost out on major endorsement deals as companies were apprehensive about her damaged reputation.a) Reeta can sue Meeta for libel.b) Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.c) Reeta cannot sue Meeta for none of the statements made by Meeta were published.d) Reeta can sue Meeta for a criminal wrongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Libel is any defamation that can be seen like writing, printing, movie, statue etc.Facts: Meeta and Reeta are both popular actresses in the Hindi film industry. They were the best of friends. However, when Meeta was replaced by Reeta in a film, she came on the sets of the film and interrupted the shooting. She started ranting on how Reeta used to pay directors and producers in order to compel them to cast her. Following this public outburst, Reeta lost out on major endorsement deals as companies were apprehensive about her damaged reputation.a) Reeta can sue Meeta for libel.b) Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.c) Reeta cannot sue Meeta for none of the statements made by Meeta were published.d) Reeta can sue Meeta for a criminal wrongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Libel is any defamation that can be seen like writing, printing, movie, statue etc.Facts: Meeta and Reeta are both popular actresses in the Hindi film industry. They were the best of friends. However, when Meeta was replaced by Reeta in a film, she came on the sets of the film and interrupted the shooting. She started ranting on how Reeta used to pay directors and producers in order to compel them to cast her. Following this public outburst, Reeta lost out on major endorsement deals as companies were apprehensive about her damaged reputation.a) Reeta can sue Meeta for libel.b) Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.c) Reeta cannot sue Meeta for none of the statements made by Meeta were published.d) Reeta can sue Meeta for a criminal wrongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Libel is any defamation that can be seen like writing, printing, movie, statue etc.Facts: Meeta and Reeta are both popular actresses in the Hindi film industry. They were the best of friends. However, when Meeta was replaced by Reeta in a film, she came on the sets of the film and interrupted the shooting. She started ranting on how Reeta used to pay directors and producers in order to compel them to cast her. Following this public outburst, Reeta lost out on major endorsement deals as companies were apprehensive about her damaged reputation.a) Reeta can sue Meeta for libel.b) Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.c) Reeta cannot sue Meeta for none of the statements made by Meeta were published.d) Reeta can sue Meeta for a criminal wrongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Libel is any defamation that can be seen like writing, printing, movie, statue etc.Facts: Meeta and Reeta are both popular actresses in the Hindi film industry. They were the best of friends. However, when Meeta was replaced by Reeta in a film, she came on the sets of the film and interrupted the shooting. She started ranting on how Reeta used to pay directors and producers in order to compel them to cast her. Following this public outburst, Reeta lost out on major endorsement deals as companies were apprehensive about her damaged reputation.a) Reeta can sue Meeta for libel.b) Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.c) Reeta cannot sue Meeta for none of the statements made by Meeta were published.d) Reeta can sue Meeta for a criminal wrongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Libel is any defamation that can be seen like writing, printing, movie, statue etc.Facts: Meeta and Reeta are both popular actresses in the Hindi film industry. They were the best of friends. However, when Meeta was replaced by Reeta in a film, she came on the sets of the film and interrupted the shooting. She started ranting on how Reeta used to pay directors and producers in order to compel them to cast her. Following this public outburst, Reeta lost out on major endorsement deals as companies were apprehensive about her damaged reputation.a) Reeta can sue Meeta for libel.b) Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.c) Reeta cannot sue Meeta for none of the statements made by Meeta were published.d) Reeta can sue Meeta for a criminal wrongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Libel is any defamation that can be seen like writing, printing, movie, statue etc.Facts: Meeta and Reeta are both popular actresses in the Hindi film industry. They were the best of friends. However, when Meeta was replaced by Reeta in a film, she came on the sets of the film and interrupted the shooting. She started ranting on how Reeta used to pay directors and producers in order to compel them to cast her. Following this public outburst, Reeta lost out on major endorsement deals as companies were apprehensive about her damaged reputation.a) Reeta can sue Meeta for libel.b) Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.c) Reeta cannot sue Meeta for none of the statements made by Meeta were published.d) Reeta can sue Meeta for a criminal wrongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Libel is any defamation that can be seen like writing, printing, movie, statue etc.Facts: Meeta and Reeta are both popular actresses in the Hindi film industry. They were the best of friends. However, when Meeta was replaced by Reeta in a film, she came on the sets of the film and interrupted the shooting. She started ranting on how Reeta used to pay directors and producers in order to compel them to cast her. Following this public outburst, Reeta lost out on major endorsement deals as companies were apprehensive about her damaged reputation.a) Reeta can sue Meeta for libel.b) Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.c) Reeta cannot sue Meeta for none of the statements made by Meeta were published.d) Reeta can sue Meeta for a criminal wrongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principle:I. Slander is any defamation that is spoken or heard.II. Libel is any defamation that can be seen like writing, printing, movie, statue etc.Facts: Meeta and Reeta are both popular actresses in the Hindi film industry. They were the best of friends. However, when Meeta was replaced by Reeta in a film, she came on the sets of the film and interrupted the shooting. She started ranting on how Reeta used to pay directors and producers in order to compel them to cast her. Following this public outburst, Reeta lost out on major endorsement deals as companies were apprehensive about her damaged reputation.a) Reeta can sue Meeta for libel.b) Reeta can sue Meeta for slander.c) Reeta cannot sue Meeta for none of the statements made by Meeta were published.d) Reeta can sue Meeta for a criminal wrongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup on EduRev and stay on top of your study goals
10M+ students crushing their study goals daily