CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Principle:I. A person can be held guilty und...
Start Learning for Free
Principle:
I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence only if there is proximate cause and the damage is not too remote
II. Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing for
III. Proximate cause may be doubtful when a superseding intervening cause happens shortly after the injury.
Facts: Bantu was playing in the school soccer field when he got hit hard by the ball in his chest by a friend. He fell unconscious and suffered severe internal injuries. His mother decided to sue for the tort of negligence.
Which of the following is correct?
- a)The damage to Bantu was due to proximate cause
- b)The damage to Bantu was remote
- c)The damage to Bantu was due to superseding intervening cause
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence...
Going by principles I and II, it is clear that Bantu was injured as a direct result of being hit by the ball on the soccer field, and neither the cause nor the damage was too remote. Thus, it may be deduced that the damage to Bantu was due to proximate cause.
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence...
Explanation:
Proximate Cause:
- Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing for.
- In this case, Bantu's injuries were directly caused by getting hit in the chest with a soccer ball, which was a direct result of the negligence of his friend who hit the ball.
Remote Damage:
- The damage to Bantu was not too remote because it was directly caused by the incident on the soccer field.
- Since the harm was immediate and directly linked to the action of his friend hitting him with the ball, it falls under proximate cause.
Superseding Intervening Cause:
- A superseding intervening cause may be doubtful if it happens shortly after the injury.
- In this case, there was no superseding intervening cause that occurred after the incident on the soccer field, so the damage to Bantu can be attributed to the proximate cause.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A', which states that the damage to Bantu was due to proximate cause.
Proximate Cause:
- Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing for.
- In this case, Bantu's injuries were directly caused by getting hit in the chest with a soccer ball, which was a direct result of the negligence of his friend who hit the ball.
Remote Damage:
- The damage to Bantu was not too remote because it was directly caused by the incident on the soccer field.
- Since the harm was immediate and directly linked to the action of his friend hitting him with the ball, it falls under proximate cause.
Superseding Intervening Cause:
- A superseding intervening cause may be doubtful if it happens shortly after the injury.
- In this case, there was no superseding intervening cause that occurred after the incident on the soccer field, so the damage to Bantu can be attributed to the proximate cause.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A', which states that the damage to Bantu was due to proximate cause.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence...
Why is it answer A
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Question Description
Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence only if there is proximate cause and the damage is not too remoteII. Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing forIII. Proximate cause may be doubtful when a superseding intervening cause happens shortly after the injury.Facts: Bantu was playing in the school soccer field when he got hit hard by the ball in his chest by a friend. He fell unconscious and suffered severe internal injuries. His mother decided to sue for the tort of negligence.Which of the following is correct?a) The damage to Bantu was due to proximate causeb) The damage to Bantu was remotec) The damage to Bantu was due to superseding intervening caused) None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence only if there is proximate cause and the damage is not too remoteII. Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing forIII. Proximate cause may be doubtful when a superseding intervening cause happens shortly after the injury.Facts: Bantu was playing in the school soccer field when he got hit hard by the ball in his chest by a friend. He fell unconscious and suffered severe internal injuries. His mother decided to sue for the tort of negligence.Which of the following is correct?a) The damage to Bantu was due to proximate causeb) The damage to Bantu was remotec) The damage to Bantu was due to superseding intervening caused) None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence only if there is proximate cause and the damage is not too remoteII. Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing forIII. Proximate cause may be doubtful when a superseding intervening cause happens shortly after the injury.Facts: Bantu was playing in the school soccer field when he got hit hard by the ball in his chest by a friend. He fell unconscious and suffered severe internal injuries. His mother decided to sue for the tort of negligence.Which of the following is correct?a) The damage to Bantu was due to proximate causeb) The damage to Bantu was remotec) The damage to Bantu was due to superseding intervening caused) None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence only if there is proximate cause and the damage is not too remoteII. Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing forIII. Proximate cause may be doubtful when a superseding intervening cause happens shortly after the injury.Facts: Bantu was playing in the school soccer field when he got hit hard by the ball in his chest by a friend. He fell unconscious and suffered severe internal injuries. His mother decided to sue for the tort of negligence.Which of the following is correct?a) The damage to Bantu was due to proximate causeb) The damage to Bantu was remotec) The damage to Bantu was due to superseding intervening caused) None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence only if there is proximate cause and the damage is not too remoteII. Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing forIII. Proximate cause may be doubtful when a superseding intervening cause happens shortly after the injury.Facts: Bantu was playing in the school soccer field when he got hit hard by the ball in his chest by a friend. He fell unconscious and suffered severe internal injuries. His mother decided to sue for the tort of negligence.Which of the following is correct?a) The damage to Bantu was due to proximate causeb) The damage to Bantu was remotec) The damage to Bantu was due to superseding intervening caused) None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence only if there is proximate cause and the damage is not too remoteII. Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing forIII. Proximate cause may be doubtful when a superseding intervening cause happens shortly after the injury.Facts: Bantu was playing in the school soccer field when he got hit hard by the ball in his chest by a friend. He fell unconscious and suffered severe internal injuries. His mother decided to sue for the tort of negligence.Which of the following is correct?a) The damage to Bantu was due to proximate causeb) The damage to Bantu was remotec) The damage to Bantu was due to superseding intervening caused) None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence only if there is proximate cause and the damage is not too remoteII. Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing forIII. Proximate cause may be doubtful when a superseding intervening cause happens shortly after the injury.Facts: Bantu was playing in the school soccer field when he got hit hard by the ball in his chest by a friend. He fell unconscious and suffered severe internal injuries. His mother decided to sue for the tort of negligence.Which of the following is correct?a) The damage to Bantu was due to proximate causeb) The damage to Bantu was remotec) The damage to Bantu was due to superseding intervening caused) None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence only if there is proximate cause and the damage is not too remoteII. Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing forIII. Proximate cause may be doubtful when a superseding intervening cause happens shortly after the injury.Facts: Bantu was playing in the school soccer field when he got hit hard by the ball in his chest by a friend. He fell unconscious and suffered severe internal injuries. His mother decided to sue for the tort of negligence.Which of the following is correct?a) The damage to Bantu was due to proximate causeb) The damage to Bantu was remotec) The damage to Bantu was due to superseding intervening caused) None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence only if there is proximate cause and the damage is not too remoteII. Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing forIII. Proximate cause may be doubtful when a superseding intervening cause happens shortly after the injury.Facts: Bantu was playing in the school soccer field when he got hit hard by the ball in his chest by a friend. He fell unconscious and suffered severe internal injuries. His mother decided to sue for the tort of negligence.Which of the following is correct?a) The damage to Bantu was due to proximate causeb) The damage to Bantu was remotec) The damage to Bantu was due to superseding intervening caused) None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence only if there is proximate cause and the damage is not too remoteII. Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing forIII. Proximate cause may be doubtful when a superseding intervening cause happens shortly after the injury.Facts: Bantu was playing in the school soccer field when he got hit hard by the ball in his chest by a friend. He fell unconscious and suffered severe internal injuries. His mother decided to sue for the tort of negligence.Which of the following is correct?a) The damage to Bantu was due to proximate causeb) The damage to Bantu was remotec) The damage to Bantu was due to superseding intervening caused) None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence only if there is proximate cause and the damage is not too remoteII. Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing forIII. Proximate cause may be doubtful when a superseding intervening cause happens shortly after the injury.Facts: Bantu was playing in the school soccer field when he got hit hard by the ball in his chest by a friend. He fell unconscious and suffered severe internal injuries. His mother decided to sue for the tort of negligence.Which of the following is correct?a) The damage to Bantu was due to proximate causeb) The damage to Bantu was remotec) The damage to Bantu was due to superseding intervening caused) None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principle:I. A person can be held guilty under the tort of negligence only if there is proximate cause and the damage is not too remoteII. Proximate cause means that you must be able to show that the harm was caused by the tort you are suing forIII. Proximate cause may be doubtful when a superseding intervening cause happens shortly after the injury.Facts: Bantu was playing in the school soccer field when he got hit hard by the ball in his chest by a friend. He fell unconscious and suffered severe internal injuries. His mother decided to sue for the tort of negligence.Which of the following is correct?a) The damage to Bantu was due to proximate causeb) The damage to Bantu was remotec) The damage to Bantu was due to superseding intervening caused) None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up
within 7 days!
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup