Question Description
Those in the business community who decry government regulation claim that it increases the costs of doing business and reduces beneficial competition, ultimately harming both business and the community as a whole. They point to industries such as trucking, airlines, and telecommunications, in which deregulation has apparently brought greater economic efficiency. These commentators ignore the industries, such as financial services, in which government regulation is essential; indeed, without government intervention in the 1930s, some whole segments of that industry might have permanently collapsed.The author’s point is made primarily bya) offering a counter-example to rebut his opponents’ argumentb) calling into question the motives of his opponentsc) pointing out an inconsistency in his opponents’ use of termsd) drawing a distinction between valid and invalid methods of argumente) underscoring the subjectivity of his opponents’ basic assumptionsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Those in the business community who decry government regulation claim that it increases the costs of doing business and reduces beneficial competition, ultimately harming both business and the community as a whole. They point to industries such as trucking, airlines, and telecommunications, in which deregulation has apparently brought greater economic efficiency. These commentators ignore the industries, such as financial services, in which government regulation is essential; indeed, without government intervention in the 1930s, some whole segments of that industry might have permanently collapsed.The author’s point is made primarily bya) offering a counter-example to rebut his opponents’ argumentb) calling into question the motives of his opponentsc) pointing out an inconsistency in his opponents’ use of termsd) drawing a distinction between valid and invalid methods of argumente) underscoring the subjectivity of his opponents’ basic assumptionsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Those in the business community who decry government regulation claim that it increases the costs of doing business and reduces beneficial competition, ultimately harming both business and the community as a whole. They point to industries such as trucking, airlines, and telecommunications, in which deregulation has apparently brought greater economic efficiency. These commentators ignore the industries, such as financial services, in which government regulation is essential; indeed, without government intervention in the 1930s, some whole segments of that industry might have permanently collapsed.The author’s point is made primarily bya) offering a counter-example to rebut his opponents’ argumentb) calling into question the motives of his opponentsc) pointing out an inconsistency in his opponents’ use of termsd) drawing a distinction between valid and invalid methods of argumente) underscoring the subjectivity of his opponents’ basic assumptionsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Those in the business community who decry government regulation claim that it increases the costs of doing business and reduces beneficial competition, ultimately harming both business and the community as a whole. They point to industries such as trucking, airlines, and telecommunications, in which deregulation has apparently brought greater economic efficiency. These commentators ignore the industries, such as financial services, in which government regulation is essential; indeed, without government intervention in the 1930s, some whole segments of that industry might have permanently collapsed.The author’s point is made primarily bya) offering a counter-example to rebut his opponents’ argumentb) calling into question the motives of his opponentsc) pointing out an inconsistency in his opponents’ use of termsd) drawing a distinction between valid and invalid methods of argumente) underscoring the subjectivity of his opponents’ basic assumptionsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Those in the business community who decry government regulation claim that it increases the costs of doing business and reduces beneficial competition, ultimately harming both business and the community as a whole. They point to industries such as trucking, airlines, and telecommunications, in which deregulation has apparently brought greater economic efficiency. These commentators ignore the industries, such as financial services, in which government regulation is essential; indeed, without government intervention in the 1930s, some whole segments of that industry might have permanently collapsed.The author’s point is made primarily bya) offering a counter-example to rebut his opponents’ argumentb) calling into question the motives of his opponentsc) pointing out an inconsistency in his opponents’ use of termsd) drawing a distinction between valid and invalid methods of argumente) underscoring the subjectivity of his opponents’ basic assumptionsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Those in the business community who decry government regulation claim that it increases the costs of doing business and reduces beneficial competition, ultimately harming both business and the community as a whole. They point to industries such as trucking, airlines, and telecommunications, in which deregulation has apparently brought greater economic efficiency. These commentators ignore the industries, such as financial services, in which government regulation is essential; indeed, without government intervention in the 1930s, some whole segments of that industry might have permanently collapsed.The author’s point is made primarily bya) offering a counter-example to rebut his opponents’ argumentb) calling into question the motives of his opponentsc) pointing out an inconsistency in his opponents’ use of termsd) drawing a distinction between valid and invalid methods of argumente) underscoring the subjectivity of his opponents’ basic assumptionsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Those in the business community who decry government regulation claim that it increases the costs of doing business and reduces beneficial competition, ultimately harming both business and the community as a whole. They point to industries such as trucking, airlines, and telecommunications, in which deregulation has apparently brought greater economic efficiency. These commentators ignore the industries, such as financial services, in which government regulation is essential; indeed, without government intervention in the 1930s, some whole segments of that industry might have permanently collapsed.The author’s point is made primarily bya) offering a counter-example to rebut his opponents’ argumentb) calling into question the motives of his opponentsc) pointing out an inconsistency in his opponents’ use of termsd) drawing a distinction between valid and invalid methods of argumente) underscoring the subjectivity of his opponents’ basic assumptionsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Those in the business community who decry government regulation claim that it increases the costs of doing business and reduces beneficial competition, ultimately harming both business and the community as a whole. They point to industries such as trucking, airlines, and telecommunications, in which deregulation has apparently brought greater economic efficiency. These commentators ignore the industries, such as financial services, in which government regulation is essential; indeed, without government intervention in the 1930s, some whole segments of that industry might have permanently collapsed.The author’s point is made primarily bya) offering a counter-example to rebut his opponents’ argumentb) calling into question the motives of his opponentsc) pointing out an inconsistency in his opponents’ use of termsd) drawing a distinction between valid and invalid methods of argumente) underscoring the subjectivity of his opponents’ basic assumptionsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Those in the business community who decry government regulation claim that it increases the costs of doing business and reduces beneficial competition, ultimately harming both business and the community as a whole. They point to industries such as trucking, airlines, and telecommunications, in which deregulation has apparently brought greater economic efficiency. These commentators ignore the industries, such as financial services, in which government regulation is essential; indeed, without government intervention in the 1930s, some whole segments of that industry might have permanently collapsed.The author’s point is made primarily bya) offering a counter-example to rebut his opponents’ argumentb) calling into question the motives of his opponentsc) pointing out an inconsistency in his opponents’ use of termsd) drawing a distinction between valid and invalid methods of argumente) underscoring the subjectivity of his opponents’ basic assumptionsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.