Question Description
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe first time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the story bewitched me. The second time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the special effects amazed me. The third time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the photography dazzled me. Have you ever seen a movie twice, three times? You notice subtleties and hear sounds you completely missed the first time around.It’s the same on the phone. Because your business conversations are more consequential than movies, you should listen to them two, maybe three times, Often, we have no clear idea of what really happened in our phone conversation until we hear it again. You’ll find shadings more significant than the colour of Toto’s collar- and more scarecrows than you imagined who ‘haven’t got a brain!’ How do you listen to your important business conversa- tions again?Simply legally and ethically tape-record them. I call the technique of recording and analysing your business conversations for subtleties Instant Replay.The advice is being given to the sales team.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe first time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the story bewitched me. The second time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the special effects amazed me. The third time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the photography dazzled me. Have you ever seen a movie twice, three times? You notice subtleties and hear sounds you completely missed the first time around.It’s the same on the phone. Because your business conversations are more consequential than movies, you should listen to them two, maybe three times, Often, we have no clear idea of what really happened in our phone conversation until we hear it again. You’ll find shadings more significant than the colour of Toto’s collar- and more scarecrows than you imagined who ‘haven’t got a brain!’ How do you listen to your important business conversa- tions again?Simply legally and ethically tape-record them. I call the technique of recording and analysing your business conversations for subtleties Instant Replay.The advice is being given to the sales team.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe first time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the story bewitched me. The second time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the special effects amazed me. The third time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the photography dazzled me. Have you ever seen a movie twice, three times? You notice subtleties and hear sounds you completely missed the first time around.It’s the same on the phone. Because your business conversations are more consequential than movies, you should listen to them two, maybe three times, Often, we have no clear idea of what really happened in our phone conversation until we hear it again. You’ll find shadings more significant than the colour of Toto’s collar- and more scarecrows than you imagined who ‘haven’t got a brain!’ How do you listen to your important business conversa- tions again?Simply legally and ethically tape-record them. I call the technique of recording and analysing your business conversations for subtleties Instant Replay.The advice is being given to the sales team.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe first time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the story bewitched me. The second time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the special effects amazed me. The third time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the photography dazzled me. Have you ever seen a movie twice, three times? You notice subtleties and hear sounds you completely missed the first time around.It’s the same on the phone. Because your business conversations are more consequential than movies, you should listen to them two, maybe three times, Often, we have no clear idea of what really happened in our phone conversation until we hear it again. You’ll find shadings more significant than the colour of Toto’s collar- and more scarecrows than you imagined who ‘haven’t got a brain!’ How do you listen to your important business conversa- tions again?Simply legally and ethically tape-record them. I call the technique of recording and analysing your business conversations for subtleties Instant Replay.The advice is being given to the sales team.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe first time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the story bewitched me. The second time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the special effects amazed me. The third time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the photography dazzled me. Have you ever seen a movie twice, three times? You notice subtleties and hear sounds you completely missed the first time around.It’s the same on the phone. Because your business conversations are more consequential than movies, you should listen to them two, maybe three times, Often, we have no clear idea of what really happened in our phone conversation until we hear it again. You’ll find shadings more significant than the colour of Toto’s collar- and more scarecrows than you imagined who ‘haven’t got a brain!’ How do you listen to your important business conversa- tions again?Simply legally and ethically tape-record them. I call the technique of recording and analysing your business conversations for subtleties Instant Replay.The advice is being given to the sales team.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe first time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the story bewitched me. The second time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the special effects amazed me. The third time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the photography dazzled me. Have you ever seen a movie twice, three times? You notice subtleties and hear sounds you completely missed the first time around.It’s the same on the phone. Because your business conversations are more consequential than movies, you should listen to them two, maybe three times, Often, we have no clear idea of what really happened in our phone conversation until we hear it again. You’ll find shadings more significant than the colour of Toto’s collar- and more scarecrows than you imagined who ‘haven’t got a brain!’ How do you listen to your important business conversa- tions again?Simply legally and ethically tape-record them. I call the technique of recording and analysing your business conversations for subtleties Instant Replay.The advice is being given to the sales team.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe first time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the story bewitched me. The second time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the special effects amazed me. The third time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the photography dazzled me. Have you ever seen a movie twice, three times? You notice subtleties and hear sounds you completely missed the first time around.It’s the same on the phone. Because your business conversations are more consequential than movies, you should listen to them two, maybe three times, Often, we have no clear idea of what really happened in our phone conversation until we hear it again. You’ll find shadings more significant than the colour of Toto’s collar- and more scarecrows than you imagined who ‘haven’t got a brain!’ How do you listen to your important business conversa- tions again?Simply legally and ethically tape-record them. I call the technique of recording and analysing your business conversations for subtleties Instant Replay.The advice is being given to the sales team.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe first time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the story bewitched me. The second time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the special effects amazed me. The third time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the photography dazzled me. Have you ever seen a movie twice, three times? You notice subtleties and hear sounds you completely missed the first time around.It’s the same on the phone. Because your business conversations are more consequential than movies, you should listen to them two, maybe three times, Often, we have no clear idea of what really happened in our phone conversation until we hear it again. You’ll find shadings more significant than the colour of Toto’s collar- and more scarecrows than you imagined who ‘haven’t got a brain!’ How do you listen to your important business conversa- tions again?Simply legally and ethically tape-record them. I call the technique of recording and analysing your business conversations for subtleties Instant Replay.The advice is being given to the sales team.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe first time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the story bewitched me. The second time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the special effects amazed me. The third time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the photography dazzled me. Have you ever seen a movie twice, three times? You notice subtleties and hear sounds you completely missed the first time around.It’s the same on the phone. Because your business conversations are more consequential than movies, you should listen to them two, maybe three times, Often, we have no clear idea of what really happened in our phone conversation until we hear it again. You’ll find shadings more significant than the colour of Toto’s collar- and more scarecrows than you imagined who ‘haven’t got a brain!’ How do you listen to your important business conversa- tions again?Simply legally and ethically tape-record them. I call the technique of recording and analysing your business conversations for subtleties Instant Replay.The advice is being given to the sales team.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.