Question Description
DIRECTIONfor the question:Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Contradictions are a necessary ingredient for triggering intellectual creativity. While most humans struggle to maintain a sense of psychological unity, contradictions produce destabilising breaches in the self. Whether conscious or unconscious, these fissures nourish creative inspiration, which can be interpreted as a way to resolve or sublimate internal oppositions. I believe this can be said of all domains of creation. Perhaps art, literature, science or philosophy wouldn’t be possible without intrapersonal contradictions and the desire to resolve them. Is there anyone who lives according to the Stoic principle of Plutarch, in ‘perfect agreement between the maxims of men and their conduct’? No, but this isn’t always a cause for crisis. We compartmentalise knowledge, practices and emotions. In certain domains of life, some behaviours and thoughts are acceptable but not in others. For instance, lying might be seen as a heroic act when done to protect victims from a brutal regime, but in a friendly relationship it is unbearable. In labs, scientists can produce evidence-based research in the context of their professional lives, then go home and attend religious prayers addressing the existence of invisible entities. Humans live peacefully with contradictions precisely because of their capacity to compartmentalise.Q. Which of the following could be the most logical off-shoot of this ability of humans to compartmentalise and as a result be able to live with contradictions?a)We have been able to give nuanced explanation of the contradictions that are around usb)As a result of this compartmentalisation, we have been able to give satisfying explanations to contradictions to soothe our cognitive dissonancec)Contradictions and cognitive dissonance are inter-related conceptsd)These compartments are basic fundamental blocks that give rise to human biasese)Because contradictions tend to upset the existing mental threshold, we must encourage this human frailty for larger goodCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about DIRECTIONfor the question:Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Contradictions are a necessary ingredient for triggering intellectual creativity. While most humans struggle to maintain a sense of psychological unity, contradictions produce destabilising breaches in the self. Whether conscious or unconscious, these fissures nourish creative inspiration, which can be interpreted as a way to resolve or sublimate internal oppositions. I believe this can be said of all domains of creation. Perhaps art, literature, science or philosophy wouldn’t be possible without intrapersonal contradictions and the desire to resolve them. Is there anyone who lives according to the Stoic principle of Plutarch, in ‘perfect agreement between the maxims of men and their conduct’? No, but this isn’t always a cause for crisis. We compartmentalise knowledge, practices and emotions. In certain domains of life, some behaviours and thoughts are acceptable but not in others. For instance, lying might be seen as a heroic act when done to protect victims from a brutal regime, but in a friendly relationship it is unbearable. In labs, scientists can produce evidence-based research in the context of their professional lives, then go home and attend religious prayers addressing the existence of invisible entities. Humans live peacefully with contradictions precisely because of their capacity to compartmentalise.Q. Which of the following could be the most logical off-shoot of this ability of humans to compartmentalise and as a result be able to live with contradictions?a)We have been able to give nuanced explanation of the contradictions that are around usb)As a result of this compartmentalisation, we have been able to give satisfying explanations to contradictions to soothe our cognitive dissonancec)Contradictions and cognitive dissonance are inter-related conceptsd)These compartments are basic fundamental blocks that give rise to human biasese)Because contradictions tend to upset the existing mental threshold, we must encourage this human frailty for larger goodCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for DIRECTIONfor the question:Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Contradictions are a necessary ingredient for triggering intellectual creativity. While most humans struggle to maintain a sense of psychological unity, contradictions produce destabilising breaches in the self. Whether conscious or unconscious, these fissures nourish creative inspiration, which can be interpreted as a way to resolve or sublimate internal oppositions. I believe this can be said of all domains of creation. Perhaps art, literature, science or philosophy wouldn’t be possible without intrapersonal contradictions and the desire to resolve them. Is there anyone who lives according to the Stoic principle of Plutarch, in ‘perfect agreement between the maxims of men and their conduct’? No, but this isn’t always a cause for crisis. We compartmentalise knowledge, practices and emotions. In certain domains of life, some behaviours and thoughts are acceptable but not in others. For instance, lying might be seen as a heroic act when done to protect victims from a brutal regime, but in a friendly relationship it is unbearable. In labs, scientists can produce evidence-based research in the context of their professional lives, then go home and attend religious prayers addressing the existence of invisible entities. Humans live peacefully with contradictions precisely because of their capacity to compartmentalise.Q. Which of the following could be the most logical off-shoot of this ability of humans to compartmentalise and as a result be able to live with contradictions?a)We have been able to give nuanced explanation of the contradictions that are around usb)As a result of this compartmentalisation, we have been able to give satisfying explanations to contradictions to soothe our cognitive dissonancec)Contradictions and cognitive dissonance are inter-related conceptsd)These compartments are basic fundamental blocks that give rise to human biasese)Because contradictions tend to upset the existing mental threshold, we must encourage this human frailty for larger goodCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for DIRECTIONfor the question:Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Contradictions are a necessary ingredient for triggering intellectual creativity. While most humans struggle to maintain a sense of psychological unity, contradictions produce destabilising breaches in the self. Whether conscious or unconscious, these fissures nourish creative inspiration, which can be interpreted as a way to resolve or sublimate internal oppositions. I believe this can be said of all domains of creation. Perhaps art, literature, science or philosophy wouldn’t be possible without intrapersonal contradictions and the desire to resolve them. Is there anyone who lives according to the Stoic principle of Plutarch, in ‘perfect agreement between the maxims of men and their conduct’? No, but this isn’t always a cause for crisis. We compartmentalise knowledge, practices and emotions. In certain domains of life, some behaviours and thoughts are acceptable but not in others. For instance, lying might be seen as a heroic act when done to protect victims from a brutal regime, but in a friendly relationship it is unbearable. In labs, scientists can produce evidence-based research in the context of their professional lives, then go home and attend religious prayers addressing the existence of invisible entities. Humans live peacefully with contradictions precisely because of their capacity to compartmentalise.Q. Which of the following could be the most logical off-shoot of this ability of humans to compartmentalise and as a result be able to live with contradictions?a)We have been able to give nuanced explanation of the contradictions that are around usb)As a result of this compartmentalisation, we have been able to give satisfying explanations to contradictions to soothe our cognitive dissonancec)Contradictions and cognitive dissonance are inter-related conceptsd)These compartments are basic fundamental blocks that give rise to human biasese)Because contradictions tend to upset the existing mental threshold, we must encourage this human frailty for larger goodCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of DIRECTIONfor the question:Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Contradictions are a necessary ingredient for triggering intellectual creativity. While most humans struggle to maintain a sense of psychological unity, contradictions produce destabilising breaches in the self. Whether conscious or unconscious, these fissures nourish creative inspiration, which can be interpreted as a way to resolve or sublimate internal oppositions. I believe this can be said of all domains of creation. Perhaps art, literature, science or philosophy wouldn’t be possible without intrapersonal contradictions and the desire to resolve them. Is there anyone who lives according to the Stoic principle of Plutarch, in ‘perfect agreement between the maxims of men and their conduct’? No, but this isn’t always a cause for crisis. We compartmentalise knowledge, practices and emotions. In certain domains of life, some behaviours and thoughts are acceptable but not in others. For instance, lying might be seen as a heroic act when done to protect victims from a brutal regime, but in a friendly relationship it is unbearable. In labs, scientists can produce evidence-based research in the context of their professional lives, then go home and attend religious prayers addressing the existence of invisible entities. Humans live peacefully with contradictions precisely because of their capacity to compartmentalise.Q. Which of the following could be the most logical off-shoot of this ability of humans to compartmentalise and as a result be able to live with contradictions?a)We have been able to give nuanced explanation of the contradictions that are around usb)As a result of this compartmentalisation, we have been able to give satisfying explanations to contradictions to soothe our cognitive dissonancec)Contradictions and cognitive dissonance are inter-related conceptsd)These compartments are basic fundamental blocks that give rise to human biasese)Because contradictions tend to upset the existing mental threshold, we must encourage this human frailty for larger goodCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of DIRECTIONfor the question:Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Contradictions are a necessary ingredient for triggering intellectual creativity. While most humans struggle to maintain a sense of psychological unity, contradictions produce destabilising breaches in the self. Whether conscious or unconscious, these fissures nourish creative inspiration, which can be interpreted as a way to resolve or sublimate internal oppositions. I believe this can be said of all domains of creation. Perhaps art, literature, science or philosophy wouldn’t be possible without intrapersonal contradictions and the desire to resolve them. Is there anyone who lives according to the Stoic principle of Plutarch, in ‘perfect agreement between the maxims of men and their conduct’? No, but this isn’t always a cause for crisis. We compartmentalise knowledge, practices and emotions. In certain domains of life, some behaviours and thoughts are acceptable but not in others. For instance, lying might be seen as a heroic act when done to protect victims from a brutal regime, but in a friendly relationship it is unbearable. In labs, scientists can produce evidence-based research in the context of their professional lives, then go home and attend religious prayers addressing the existence of invisible entities. Humans live peacefully with contradictions precisely because of their capacity to compartmentalise.Q. Which of the following could be the most logical off-shoot of this ability of humans to compartmentalise and as a result be able to live with contradictions?a)We have been able to give nuanced explanation of the contradictions that are around usb)As a result of this compartmentalisation, we have been able to give satisfying explanations to contradictions to soothe our cognitive dissonancec)Contradictions and cognitive dissonance are inter-related conceptsd)These compartments are basic fundamental blocks that give rise to human biasese)Because contradictions tend to upset the existing mental threshold, we must encourage this human frailty for larger goodCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for DIRECTIONfor the question:Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Contradictions are a necessary ingredient for triggering intellectual creativity. While most humans struggle to maintain a sense of psychological unity, contradictions produce destabilising breaches in the self. Whether conscious or unconscious, these fissures nourish creative inspiration, which can be interpreted as a way to resolve or sublimate internal oppositions. I believe this can be said of all domains of creation. Perhaps art, literature, science or philosophy wouldn’t be possible without intrapersonal contradictions and the desire to resolve them. Is there anyone who lives according to the Stoic principle of Plutarch, in ‘perfect agreement between the maxims of men and their conduct’? No, but this isn’t always a cause for crisis. We compartmentalise knowledge, practices and emotions. In certain domains of life, some behaviours and thoughts are acceptable but not in others. For instance, lying might be seen as a heroic act when done to protect victims from a brutal regime, but in a friendly relationship it is unbearable. In labs, scientists can produce evidence-based research in the context of their professional lives, then go home and attend religious prayers addressing the existence of invisible entities. Humans live peacefully with contradictions precisely because of their capacity to compartmentalise.Q. Which of the following could be the most logical off-shoot of this ability of humans to compartmentalise and as a result be able to live with contradictions?a)We have been able to give nuanced explanation of the contradictions that are around usb)As a result of this compartmentalisation, we have been able to give satisfying explanations to contradictions to soothe our cognitive dissonancec)Contradictions and cognitive dissonance are inter-related conceptsd)These compartments are basic fundamental blocks that give rise to human biasese)Because contradictions tend to upset the existing mental threshold, we must encourage this human frailty for larger goodCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of DIRECTIONfor the question:Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Contradictions are a necessary ingredient for triggering intellectual creativity. While most humans struggle to maintain a sense of psychological unity, contradictions produce destabilising breaches in the self. Whether conscious or unconscious, these fissures nourish creative inspiration, which can be interpreted as a way to resolve or sublimate internal oppositions. I believe this can be said of all domains of creation. Perhaps art, literature, science or philosophy wouldn’t be possible without intrapersonal contradictions and the desire to resolve them. Is there anyone who lives according to the Stoic principle of Plutarch, in ‘perfect agreement between the maxims of men and their conduct’? No, but this isn’t always a cause for crisis. We compartmentalise knowledge, practices and emotions. In certain domains of life, some behaviours and thoughts are acceptable but not in others. For instance, lying might be seen as a heroic act when done to protect victims from a brutal regime, but in a friendly relationship it is unbearable. In labs, scientists can produce evidence-based research in the context of their professional lives, then go home and attend religious prayers addressing the existence of invisible entities. Humans live peacefully with contradictions precisely because of their capacity to compartmentalise.Q. Which of the following could be the most logical off-shoot of this ability of humans to compartmentalise and as a result be able to live with contradictions?a)We have been able to give nuanced explanation of the contradictions that are around usb)As a result of this compartmentalisation, we have been able to give satisfying explanations to contradictions to soothe our cognitive dissonancec)Contradictions and cognitive dissonance are inter-related conceptsd)These compartments are basic fundamental blocks that give rise to human biasese)Because contradictions tend to upset the existing mental threshold, we must encourage this human frailty for larger goodCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice DIRECTIONfor the question:Answer the question based on the information given in the passage.Contradictions are a necessary ingredient for triggering intellectual creativity. While most humans struggle to maintain a sense of psychological unity, contradictions produce destabilising breaches in the self. Whether conscious or unconscious, these fissures nourish creative inspiration, which can be interpreted as a way to resolve or sublimate internal oppositions. I believe this can be said of all domains of creation. Perhaps art, literature, science or philosophy wouldn’t be possible without intrapersonal contradictions and the desire to resolve them. Is there anyone who lives according to the Stoic principle of Plutarch, in ‘perfect agreement between the maxims of men and their conduct’? No, but this isn’t always a cause for crisis. We compartmentalise knowledge, practices and emotions. In certain domains of life, some behaviours and thoughts are acceptable but not in others. For instance, lying might be seen as a heroic act when done to protect victims from a brutal regime, but in a friendly relationship it is unbearable. In labs, scientists can produce evidence-based research in the context of their professional lives, then go home and attend religious prayers addressing the existence of invisible entities. Humans live peacefully with contradictions precisely because of their capacity to compartmentalise.Q. Which of the following could be the most logical off-shoot of this ability of humans to compartmentalise and as a result be able to live with contradictions?a)We have been able to give nuanced explanation of the contradictions that are around usb)As a result of this compartmentalisation, we have been able to give satisfying explanations to contradictions to soothe our cognitive dissonancec)Contradictions and cognitive dissonance are inter-related conceptsd)These compartments are basic fundamental blocks that give rise to human biasese)Because contradictions tend to upset the existing mental threshold, we must encourage this human frailty for larger goodCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.