Question Description
Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.No person shall be deprived of his life and personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Life and personal liberty includes the right to personal privacy except in cases of exigent conditions harming the personal being of someone. Jamshed was an HIV positive patient. He was consulting Dr. Bhanu, a doctor in the Government Hospital who was aware of Jamsheds HIV positive status. Rakhi, Jamsheds girlfriend was not aware of his HIV positive status. One day Rakhi met Dr. Bhanu and told him that she is getting married to Jamshed. It was then that Dr. Bhanu told Rakhi that he is HIV positive which resulted in their breakup. Jamshed, upset by this, filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court alleging violation of his life and personal liberty by a Government Institution (viz the Government Hospital).a)Jamshed will succeed because his right to personal privacy has been violated by Dr. Bhanu who is employed by a Government Hospital.b)Jamshed will not succeed because in exercising his right to privacy he cannot pass the disease to public at large.c)Jamshed will not succeed because his right to personal privacy is defeated by right of Rakhi not to be infected by HIV.d)Jamshed will not succeed because he has no right to marry Rakhi against her will.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.No person shall be deprived of his life and personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Life and personal liberty includes the right to personal privacy except in cases of exigent conditions harming the personal being of someone. Jamshed was an HIV positive patient. He was consulting Dr. Bhanu, a doctor in the Government Hospital who was aware of Jamsheds HIV positive status. Rakhi, Jamsheds girlfriend was not aware of his HIV positive status. One day Rakhi met Dr. Bhanu and told him that she is getting married to Jamshed. It was then that Dr. Bhanu told Rakhi that he is HIV positive which resulted in their breakup. Jamshed, upset by this, filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court alleging violation of his life and personal liberty by a Government Institution (viz the Government Hospital).a)Jamshed will succeed because his right to personal privacy has been violated by Dr. Bhanu who is employed by a Government Hospital.b)Jamshed will not succeed because in exercising his right to privacy he cannot pass the disease to public at large.c)Jamshed will not succeed because his right to personal privacy is defeated by right of Rakhi not to be infected by HIV.d)Jamshed will not succeed because he has no right to marry Rakhi against her will.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.No person shall be deprived of his life and personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Life and personal liberty includes the right to personal privacy except in cases of exigent conditions harming the personal being of someone. Jamshed was an HIV positive patient. He was consulting Dr. Bhanu, a doctor in the Government Hospital who was aware of Jamsheds HIV positive status. Rakhi, Jamsheds girlfriend was not aware of his HIV positive status. One day Rakhi met Dr. Bhanu and told him that she is getting married to Jamshed. It was then that Dr. Bhanu told Rakhi that he is HIV positive which resulted in their breakup. Jamshed, upset by this, filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court alleging violation of his life and personal liberty by a Government Institution (viz the Government Hospital).a)Jamshed will succeed because his right to personal privacy has been violated by Dr. Bhanu who is employed by a Government Hospital.b)Jamshed will not succeed because in exercising his right to privacy he cannot pass the disease to public at large.c)Jamshed will not succeed because his right to personal privacy is defeated by right of Rakhi not to be infected by HIV.d)Jamshed will not succeed because he has no right to marry Rakhi against her will.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.No person shall be deprived of his life and personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Life and personal liberty includes the right to personal privacy except in cases of exigent conditions harming the personal being of someone. Jamshed was an HIV positive patient. He was consulting Dr. Bhanu, a doctor in the Government Hospital who was aware of Jamsheds HIV positive status. Rakhi, Jamsheds girlfriend was not aware of his HIV positive status. One day Rakhi met Dr. Bhanu and told him that she is getting married to Jamshed. It was then that Dr. Bhanu told Rakhi that he is HIV positive which resulted in their breakup. Jamshed, upset by this, filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court alleging violation of his life and personal liberty by a Government Institution (viz the Government Hospital).a)Jamshed will succeed because his right to personal privacy has been violated by Dr. Bhanu who is employed by a Government Hospital.b)Jamshed will not succeed because in exercising his right to privacy he cannot pass the disease to public at large.c)Jamshed will not succeed because his right to personal privacy is defeated by right of Rakhi not to be infected by HIV.d)Jamshed will not succeed because he has no right to marry Rakhi against her will.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.No person shall be deprived of his life and personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Life and personal liberty includes the right to personal privacy except in cases of exigent conditions harming the personal being of someone. Jamshed was an HIV positive patient. He was consulting Dr. Bhanu, a doctor in the Government Hospital who was aware of Jamsheds HIV positive status. Rakhi, Jamsheds girlfriend was not aware of his HIV positive status. One day Rakhi met Dr. Bhanu and told him that she is getting married to Jamshed. It was then that Dr. Bhanu told Rakhi that he is HIV positive which resulted in their breakup. Jamshed, upset by this, filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court alleging violation of his life and personal liberty by a Government Institution (viz the Government Hospital).a)Jamshed will succeed because his right to personal privacy has been violated by Dr. Bhanu who is employed by a Government Hospital.b)Jamshed will not succeed because in exercising his right to privacy he cannot pass the disease to public at large.c)Jamshed will not succeed because his right to personal privacy is defeated by right of Rakhi not to be infected by HIV.d)Jamshed will not succeed because he has no right to marry Rakhi against her will.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.No person shall be deprived of his life and personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Life and personal liberty includes the right to personal privacy except in cases of exigent conditions harming the personal being of someone. Jamshed was an HIV positive patient. He was consulting Dr. Bhanu, a doctor in the Government Hospital who was aware of Jamsheds HIV positive status. Rakhi, Jamsheds girlfriend was not aware of his HIV positive status. One day Rakhi met Dr. Bhanu and told him that she is getting married to Jamshed. It was then that Dr. Bhanu told Rakhi that he is HIV positive which resulted in their breakup. Jamshed, upset by this, filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court alleging violation of his life and personal liberty by a Government Institution (viz the Government Hospital).a)Jamshed will succeed because his right to personal privacy has been violated by Dr. Bhanu who is employed by a Government Hospital.b)Jamshed will not succeed because in exercising his right to privacy he cannot pass the disease to public at large.c)Jamshed will not succeed because his right to personal privacy is defeated by right of Rakhi not to be infected by HIV.d)Jamshed will not succeed because he has no right to marry Rakhi against her will.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.No person shall be deprived of his life and personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Life and personal liberty includes the right to personal privacy except in cases of exigent conditions harming the personal being of someone. Jamshed was an HIV positive patient. He was consulting Dr. Bhanu, a doctor in the Government Hospital who was aware of Jamsheds HIV positive status. Rakhi, Jamsheds girlfriend was not aware of his HIV positive status. One day Rakhi met Dr. Bhanu and told him that she is getting married to Jamshed. It was then that Dr. Bhanu told Rakhi that he is HIV positive which resulted in their breakup. Jamshed, upset by this, filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court alleging violation of his life and personal liberty by a Government Institution (viz the Government Hospital).a)Jamshed will succeed because his right to personal privacy has been violated by Dr. Bhanu who is employed by a Government Hospital.b)Jamshed will not succeed because in exercising his right to privacy he cannot pass the disease to public at large.c)Jamshed will not succeed because his right to personal privacy is defeated by right of Rakhi not to be infected by HIV.d)Jamshed will not succeed because he has no right to marry Rakhi against her will.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.No person shall be deprived of his life and personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Life and personal liberty includes the right to personal privacy except in cases of exigent conditions harming the personal being of someone. Jamshed was an HIV positive patient. He was consulting Dr. Bhanu, a doctor in the Government Hospital who was aware of Jamsheds HIV positive status. Rakhi, Jamsheds girlfriend was not aware of his HIV positive status. One day Rakhi met Dr. Bhanu and told him that she is getting married to Jamshed. It was then that Dr. Bhanu told Rakhi that he is HIV positive which resulted in their breakup. Jamshed, upset by this, filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court alleging violation of his life and personal liberty by a Government Institution (viz the Government Hospital).a)Jamshed will succeed because his right to personal privacy has been violated by Dr. Bhanu who is employed by a Government Hospital.b)Jamshed will not succeed because in exercising his right to privacy he cannot pass the disease to public at large.c)Jamshed will not succeed because his right to personal privacy is defeated by right of Rakhi not to be infected by HIV.d)Jamshed will not succeed because he has no right to marry Rakhi against her will.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.No person shall be deprived of his life and personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Life and personal liberty includes the right to personal privacy except in cases of exigent conditions harming the personal being of someone. Jamshed was an HIV positive patient. He was consulting Dr. Bhanu, a doctor in the Government Hospital who was aware of Jamsheds HIV positive status. Rakhi, Jamsheds girlfriend was not aware of his HIV positive status. One day Rakhi met Dr. Bhanu and told him that she is getting married to Jamshed. It was then that Dr. Bhanu told Rakhi that he is HIV positive which resulted in their breakup. Jamshed, upset by this, filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court alleging violation of his life and personal liberty by a Government Institution (viz the Government Hospital).a)Jamshed will succeed because his right to personal privacy has been violated by Dr. Bhanu who is employed by a Government Hospital.b)Jamshed will not succeed because in exercising his right to privacy he cannot pass the disease to public at large.c)Jamshed will not succeed because his right to personal privacy is defeated by right of Rakhi not to be infected by HIV.d)Jamshed will not succeed because he has no right to marry Rakhi against her will.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.