Question Description
Direction:Read the given passages and answer the questions that follow.Prime Minister [1 ] of Australia said that he would call for ahigh-level government inquiry into the response to the countrys devastating [2]. But he did not signal a significant shift in policies to curb carbon emissions, as many had hoped.The suggested inquiry, which [1] proposed during a televised interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, came on the heels of news that a firefighter had died overnight in the state of Victoria, the site of some of the worst of the fires that have swept parts of Australia since October. At least 28 people have been killed in the fires. [1] and his government have been harshly criticized over their response to the months long crisis. The proposed inquiry, known as a royal commission, would look at that response, including the deployment of emergency services to deal with blazes that crossed state borders, streaked across mountain ranges and forced the evacuations of thousands of people along the countrys eastern and southeastern shorelines.This fire season has been the worst in Australias recorded history, burning millions of acres of land and at least 3,0 homes. The number of wild animals killed because of the fires has been estimated at over half a billion and rising.At one point, Royal Australian Navy ships were dispatched to rescue people stranded on beaches after flames and deadly smoke blocked escape routes. [1 ] has declined to consider major changes to policies on renewable energy, fossil fuels and coal. The mining and export of coal are key industries in Australias economy, and in his interview on Sunday, he reiterated that he would not put jobs at risk or raise taxes in the pursuit of lower carbon emissions. [1] has repeatedly said that enough was being done to curb emissions, particularly for a nation with Australias relatively small population. But climate scientists say that the governments targets are low to begin with and that emissions have been rising under [1 ]s government. [Extracted with edits from: "Australias Leader calls for Enquiry" - The New York Times, January 2020]The response by [1 ] was criticized heavily. His alleged lack of response was compared to the response of the Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Aderns immediate response to which one of the followingevents in March 2019:a)New Zealand protestb)Hostage crisisc)Christchurch massacred)Nelson firesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction:Read the given passages and answer the questions that follow.Prime Minister [1 ] of Australia said that he would call for ahigh-level government inquiry into the response to the countrys devastating [2]. But he did not signal a significant shift in policies to curb carbon emissions, as many had hoped.The suggested inquiry, which [1] proposed during a televised interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, came on the heels of news that a firefighter had died overnight in the state of Victoria, the site of some of the worst of the fires that have swept parts of Australia since October. At least 28 people have been killed in the fires. [1] and his government have been harshly criticized over their response to the months long crisis. The proposed inquiry, known as a royal commission, would look at that response, including the deployment of emergency services to deal with blazes that crossed state borders, streaked across mountain ranges and forced the evacuations of thousands of people along the countrys eastern and southeastern shorelines.This fire season has been the worst in Australias recorded history, burning millions of acres of land and at least 3,0 homes. The number of wild animals killed because of the fires has been estimated at over half a billion and rising.At one point, Royal Australian Navy ships were dispatched to rescue people stranded on beaches after flames and deadly smoke blocked escape routes. [1 ] has declined to consider major changes to policies on renewable energy, fossil fuels and coal. The mining and export of coal are key industries in Australias economy, and in his interview on Sunday, he reiterated that he would not put jobs at risk or raise taxes in the pursuit of lower carbon emissions. [1] has repeatedly said that enough was being done to curb emissions, particularly for a nation with Australias relatively small population. But climate scientists say that the governments targets are low to begin with and that emissions have been rising under [1 ]s government. [Extracted with edits from: "Australias Leader calls for Enquiry" - The New York Times, January 2020]The response by [1 ] was criticized heavily. His alleged lack of response was compared to the response of the Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Aderns immediate response to which one of the followingevents in March 2019:a)New Zealand protestb)Hostage crisisc)Christchurch massacred)Nelson firesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction:Read the given passages and answer the questions that follow.Prime Minister [1 ] of Australia said that he would call for ahigh-level government inquiry into the response to the countrys devastating [2]. But he did not signal a significant shift in policies to curb carbon emissions, as many had hoped.The suggested inquiry, which [1] proposed during a televised interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, came on the heels of news that a firefighter had died overnight in the state of Victoria, the site of some of the worst of the fires that have swept parts of Australia since October. At least 28 people have been killed in the fires. [1] and his government have been harshly criticized over their response to the months long crisis. The proposed inquiry, known as a royal commission, would look at that response, including the deployment of emergency services to deal with blazes that crossed state borders, streaked across mountain ranges and forced the evacuations of thousands of people along the countrys eastern and southeastern shorelines.This fire season has been the worst in Australias recorded history, burning millions of acres of land and at least 3,0 homes. The number of wild animals killed because of the fires has been estimated at over half a billion and rising.At one point, Royal Australian Navy ships were dispatched to rescue people stranded on beaches after flames and deadly smoke blocked escape routes. [1 ] has declined to consider major changes to policies on renewable energy, fossil fuels and coal. The mining and export of coal are key industries in Australias economy, and in his interview on Sunday, he reiterated that he would not put jobs at risk or raise taxes in the pursuit of lower carbon emissions. [1] has repeatedly said that enough was being done to curb emissions, particularly for a nation with Australias relatively small population. But climate scientists say that the governments targets are low to begin with and that emissions have been rising under [1 ]s government. [Extracted with edits from: "Australias Leader calls for Enquiry" - The New York Times, January 2020]The response by [1 ] was criticized heavily. His alleged lack of response was compared to the response of the Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Aderns immediate response to which one of the followingevents in March 2019:a)New Zealand protestb)Hostage crisisc)Christchurch massacred)Nelson firesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction:Read the given passages and answer the questions that follow.Prime Minister [1 ] of Australia said that he would call for ahigh-level government inquiry into the response to the countrys devastating [2]. But he did not signal a significant shift in policies to curb carbon emissions, as many had hoped.The suggested inquiry, which [1] proposed during a televised interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, came on the heels of news that a firefighter had died overnight in the state of Victoria, the site of some of the worst of the fires that have swept parts of Australia since October. At least 28 people have been killed in the fires. [1] and his government have been harshly criticized over their response to the months long crisis. The proposed inquiry, known as a royal commission, would look at that response, including the deployment of emergency services to deal with blazes that crossed state borders, streaked across mountain ranges and forced the evacuations of thousands of people along the countrys eastern and southeastern shorelines.This fire season has been the worst in Australias recorded history, burning millions of acres of land and at least 3,0 homes. The number of wild animals killed because of the fires has been estimated at over half a billion and rising.At one point, Royal Australian Navy ships were dispatched to rescue people stranded on beaches after flames and deadly smoke blocked escape routes. [1 ] has declined to consider major changes to policies on renewable energy, fossil fuels and coal. The mining and export of coal are key industries in Australias economy, and in his interview on Sunday, he reiterated that he would not put jobs at risk or raise taxes in the pursuit of lower carbon emissions. [1] has repeatedly said that enough was being done to curb emissions, particularly for a nation with Australias relatively small population. But climate scientists say that the governments targets are low to begin with and that emissions have been rising under [1 ]s government. [Extracted with edits from: "Australias Leader calls for Enquiry" - The New York Times, January 2020]The response by [1 ] was criticized heavily. His alleged lack of response was compared to the response of the Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Aderns immediate response to which one of the followingevents in March 2019:a)New Zealand protestb)Hostage crisisc)Christchurch massacred)Nelson firesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction:Read the given passages and answer the questions that follow.Prime Minister [1 ] of Australia said that he would call for ahigh-level government inquiry into the response to the countrys devastating [2]. But he did not signal a significant shift in policies to curb carbon emissions, as many had hoped.The suggested inquiry, which [1] proposed during a televised interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, came on the heels of news that a firefighter had died overnight in the state of Victoria, the site of some of the worst of the fires that have swept parts of Australia since October. At least 28 people have been killed in the fires. [1] and his government have been harshly criticized over their response to the months long crisis. The proposed inquiry, known as a royal commission, would look at that response, including the deployment of emergency services to deal with blazes that crossed state borders, streaked across mountain ranges and forced the evacuations of thousands of people along the countrys eastern and southeastern shorelines.This fire season has been the worst in Australias recorded history, burning millions of acres of land and at least 3,0 homes. The number of wild animals killed because of the fires has been estimated at over half a billion and rising.At one point, Royal Australian Navy ships were dispatched to rescue people stranded on beaches after flames and deadly smoke blocked escape routes. [1 ] has declined to consider major changes to policies on renewable energy, fossil fuels and coal. The mining and export of coal are key industries in Australias economy, and in his interview on Sunday, he reiterated that he would not put jobs at risk or raise taxes in the pursuit of lower carbon emissions. [1] has repeatedly said that enough was being done to curb emissions, particularly for a nation with Australias relatively small population. But climate scientists say that the governments targets are low to begin with and that emissions have been rising under [1 ]s government. [Extracted with edits from: "Australias Leader calls for Enquiry" - The New York Times, January 2020]The response by [1 ] was criticized heavily. His alleged lack of response was compared to the response of the Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Aderns immediate response to which one of the followingevents in March 2019:a)New Zealand protestb)Hostage crisisc)Christchurch massacred)Nelson firesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction:Read the given passages and answer the questions that follow.Prime Minister [1 ] of Australia said that he would call for ahigh-level government inquiry into the response to the countrys devastating [2]. But he did not signal a significant shift in policies to curb carbon emissions, as many had hoped.The suggested inquiry, which [1] proposed during a televised interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, came on the heels of news that a firefighter had died overnight in the state of Victoria, the site of some of the worst of the fires that have swept parts of Australia since October. At least 28 people have been killed in the fires. [1] and his government have been harshly criticized over their response to the months long crisis. The proposed inquiry, known as a royal commission, would look at that response, including the deployment of emergency services to deal with blazes that crossed state borders, streaked across mountain ranges and forced the evacuations of thousands of people along the countrys eastern and southeastern shorelines.This fire season has been the worst in Australias recorded history, burning millions of acres of land and at least 3,0 homes. The number of wild animals killed because of the fires has been estimated at over half a billion and rising.At one point, Royal Australian Navy ships were dispatched to rescue people stranded on beaches after flames and deadly smoke blocked escape routes. [1 ] has declined to consider major changes to policies on renewable energy, fossil fuels and coal. The mining and export of coal are key industries in Australias economy, and in his interview on Sunday, he reiterated that he would not put jobs at risk or raise taxes in the pursuit of lower carbon emissions. [1] has repeatedly said that enough was being done to curb emissions, particularly for a nation with Australias relatively small population. But climate scientists say that the governments targets are low to begin with and that emissions have been rising under [1 ]s government. [Extracted with edits from: "Australias Leader calls for Enquiry" - The New York Times, January 2020]The response by [1 ] was criticized heavily. His alleged lack of response was compared to the response of the Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Aderns immediate response to which one of the followingevents in March 2019:a)New Zealand protestb)Hostage crisisc)Christchurch massacred)Nelson firesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction:Read the given passages and answer the questions that follow.Prime Minister [1 ] of Australia said that he would call for ahigh-level government inquiry into the response to the countrys devastating [2]. But he did not signal a significant shift in policies to curb carbon emissions, as many had hoped.The suggested inquiry, which [1] proposed during a televised interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, came on the heels of news that a firefighter had died overnight in the state of Victoria, the site of some of the worst of the fires that have swept parts of Australia since October. At least 28 people have been killed in the fires. [1] and his government have been harshly criticized over their response to the months long crisis. The proposed inquiry, known as a royal commission, would look at that response, including the deployment of emergency services to deal with blazes that crossed state borders, streaked across mountain ranges and forced the evacuations of thousands of people along the countrys eastern and southeastern shorelines.This fire season has been the worst in Australias recorded history, burning millions of acres of land and at least 3,0 homes. The number of wild animals killed because of the fires has been estimated at over half a billion and rising.At one point, Royal Australian Navy ships were dispatched to rescue people stranded on beaches after flames and deadly smoke blocked escape routes. [1 ] has declined to consider major changes to policies on renewable energy, fossil fuels and coal. The mining and export of coal are key industries in Australias economy, and in his interview on Sunday, he reiterated that he would not put jobs at risk or raise taxes in the pursuit of lower carbon emissions. [1] has repeatedly said that enough was being done to curb emissions, particularly for a nation with Australias relatively small population. But climate scientists say that the governments targets are low to begin with and that emissions have been rising under [1 ]s government. [Extracted with edits from: "Australias Leader calls for Enquiry" - The New York Times, January 2020]The response by [1 ] was criticized heavily. His alleged lack of response was compared to the response of the Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Aderns immediate response to which one of the followingevents in March 2019:a)New Zealand protestb)Hostage crisisc)Christchurch massacred)Nelson firesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction:Read the given passages and answer the questions that follow.Prime Minister [1 ] of Australia said that he would call for ahigh-level government inquiry into the response to the countrys devastating [2]. But he did not signal a significant shift in policies to curb carbon emissions, as many had hoped.The suggested inquiry, which [1] proposed during a televised interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, came on the heels of news that a firefighter had died overnight in the state of Victoria, the site of some of the worst of the fires that have swept parts of Australia since October. At least 28 people have been killed in the fires. [1] and his government have been harshly criticized over their response to the months long crisis. The proposed inquiry, known as a royal commission, would look at that response, including the deployment of emergency services to deal with blazes that crossed state borders, streaked across mountain ranges and forced the evacuations of thousands of people along the countrys eastern and southeastern shorelines.This fire season has been the worst in Australias recorded history, burning millions of acres of land and at least 3,0 homes. The number of wild animals killed because of the fires has been estimated at over half a billion and rising.At one point, Royal Australian Navy ships were dispatched to rescue people stranded on beaches after flames and deadly smoke blocked escape routes. [1 ] has declined to consider major changes to policies on renewable energy, fossil fuels and coal. The mining and export of coal are key industries in Australias economy, and in his interview on Sunday, he reiterated that he would not put jobs at risk or raise taxes in the pursuit of lower carbon emissions. [1] has repeatedly said that enough was being done to curb emissions, particularly for a nation with Australias relatively small population. But climate scientists say that the governments targets are low to begin with and that emissions have been rising under [1 ]s government. [Extracted with edits from: "Australias Leader calls for Enquiry" - The New York Times, January 2020]The response by [1 ] was criticized heavily. His alleged lack of response was compared to the response of the Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Aderns immediate response to which one of the followingevents in March 2019:a)New Zealand protestb)Hostage crisisc)Christchurch massacred)Nelson firesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction:Read the given passages and answer the questions that follow.Prime Minister [1 ] of Australia said that he would call for ahigh-level government inquiry into the response to the countrys devastating [2]. But he did not signal a significant shift in policies to curb carbon emissions, as many had hoped.The suggested inquiry, which [1] proposed during a televised interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, came on the heels of news that a firefighter had died overnight in the state of Victoria, the site of some of the worst of the fires that have swept parts of Australia since October. At least 28 people have been killed in the fires. [1] and his government have been harshly criticized over their response to the months long crisis. The proposed inquiry, known as a royal commission, would look at that response, including the deployment of emergency services to deal with blazes that crossed state borders, streaked across mountain ranges and forced the evacuations of thousands of people along the countrys eastern and southeastern shorelines.This fire season has been the worst in Australias recorded history, burning millions of acres of land and at least 3,0 homes. The number of wild animals killed because of the fires has been estimated at over half a billion and rising.At one point, Royal Australian Navy ships were dispatched to rescue people stranded on beaches after flames and deadly smoke blocked escape routes. [1 ] has declined to consider major changes to policies on renewable energy, fossil fuels and coal. The mining and export of coal are key industries in Australias economy, and in his interview on Sunday, he reiterated that he would not put jobs at risk or raise taxes in the pursuit of lower carbon emissions. [1] has repeatedly said that enough was being done to curb emissions, particularly for a nation with Australias relatively small population. But climate scientists say that the governments targets are low to begin with and that emissions have been rising under [1 ]s government. [Extracted with edits from: "Australias Leader calls for Enquiry" - The New York Times, January 2020]The response by [1 ] was criticized heavily. His alleged lack of response was compared to the response of the Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Aderns immediate response to which one of the followingevents in March 2019:a)New Zealand protestb)Hostage crisisc)Christchurch massacred)Nelson firesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.