Question Description
Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labours behalf. In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks. (Source -Ken I. Kirsch, "Blacks and Labour-the Untold Story,"The Public Interest, Summer 2002)Which of the following would weaken the authors argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didnt maintain records of unemploymentrate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labours behalf. In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks. (Source -Ken I. Kirsch, "Blacks and Labour-the Untold Story,"The Public Interest, Summer 2002)Which of the following would weaken the authors argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didnt maintain records of unemploymentrate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labours behalf. In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks. (Source -Ken I. Kirsch, "Blacks and Labour-the Untold Story,"The Public Interest, Summer 2002)Which of the following would weaken the authors argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didnt maintain records of unemploymentrate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labours behalf. In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks. (Source -Ken I. Kirsch, "Blacks and Labour-the Untold Story,"The Public Interest, Summer 2002)Which of the following would weaken the authors argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didnt maintain records of unemploymentrate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labours behalf. In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks. (Source -Ken I. Kirsch, "Blacks and Labour-the Untold Story,"The Public Interest, Summer 2002)Which of the following would weaken the authors argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didnt maintain records of unemploymentrate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labours behalf. In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks. (Source -Ken I. Kirsch, "Blacks and Labour-the Untold Story,"The Public Interest, Summer 2002)Which of the following would weaken the authors argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didnt maintain records of unemploymentrate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labours behalf. In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks. (Source -Ken I. Kirsch, "Blacks and Labour-the Untold Story,"The Public Interest, Summer 2002)Which of the following would weaken the authors argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didnt maintain records of unemploymentrate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labours behalf. In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks. (Source -Ken I. Kirsch, "Blacks and Labour-the Untold Story,"The Public Interest, Summer 2002)Which of the following would weaken the authors argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didnt maintain records of unemploymentrate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labours behalf. In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks. (Source -Ken I. Kirsch, "Blacks and Labour-the Untold Story,"The Public Interest, Summer 2002)Which of the following would weaken the authors argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didnt maintain records of unemploymentrate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.