CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: Each set of questions in this sect...
Start Learning for Free
Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.
Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?
Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.
Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?
Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.
Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?
Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent to an entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.
Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?
Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.
In what manner does the petitioner respond to the court's first argument?
- a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.
- b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the court's analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.
- c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.
- d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reaso...
(b) very specifically states the job done by each statement of the petitioner. The first statement argues that Google's use of data and the government's use can't be compared because of the missing element of consent. The second casts a doubt on the court's assertion that the data is being used for welfare schemes. (a) is eliminated because the second statement casts a doubt on the contents of the court's question itself, more than answering it as it is. (c) and (d) are far off the mark. There is no general principle stated in the argument.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reaso...
Understanding the Petitioner's Response
The petitioner provides a nuanced counter to the court's argument regarding the use of personal data by both private entities and the state through a unique identity number like Aadhar.
Highlighting the Flaw in the Court's Analogy
- The court asserts that since private entities already possess individuals' data, the addition of the Aadhar number does not materially change the situation.
- The petitioner counters this by suggesting that while individuals may accept data sharing with private entities voluntarily, the same cannot be said for the state, which compels data sharing.
Distinction Between Consent and Compulsion
- The petitioner emphasizes that consent given to a private entity differs fundamentally from being forced to share personal data with the government.
- This distinction is crucial as it raises questions about the nature and scope of consent in different contexts.
Need for Clarity on Data Usage
- The petitioner points out the ambiguity surrounding the government's use of personal data collected via Aadhar, questioning the specific purposes for which this information is utilized.
- This lack of transparency contributes to concerns about privacy and the potential misuse of data by the state.
Conclusion
In essence, the petitioner's response effectively highlights a key flaw in the court's analogy by emphasizing the critical difference between voluntary consent to private entities and the coercive nature of state data collection. This distinction forms the core of the petitioner's argument, making option 'B' the most accurate choice.
The petitioner provides a nuanced counter to the court's argument regarding the use of personal data by both private entities and the state through a unique identity number like Aadhar.
Highlighting the Flaw in the Court's Analogy
- The court asserts that since private entities already possess individuals' data, the addition of the Aadhar number does not materially change the situation.
- The petitioner counters this by suggesting that while individuals may accept data sharing with private entities voluntarily, the same cannot be said for the state, which compels data sharing.
Distinction Between Consent and Compulsion
- The petitioner emphasizes that consent given to a private entity differs fundamentally from being forced to share personal data with the government.
- This distinction is crucial as it raises questions about the nature and scope of consent in different contexts.
Need for Clarity on Data Usage
- The petitioner points out the ambiguity surrounding the government's use of personal data collected via Aadhar, questioning the specific purposes for which this information is utilized.
- This lack of transparency contributes to concerns about privacy and the potential misuse of data by the state.
Conclusion
In essence, the petitioner's response effectively highlights a key flaw in the court's analogy by emphasizing the critical difference between voluntary consent to private entities and the coercive nature of state data collection. This distinction forms the core of the petitioner's argument, making option 'B' the most accurate choice.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.In what manner does the petitioner respond to the courts first argument?a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the courts analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.In what manner does the petitioner respond to the courts first argument?a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the courts analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.In what manner does the petitioner respond to the courts first argument?a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the courts analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.In what manner does the petitioner respond to the courts first argument?a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the courts analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.In what manner does the petitioner respond to the courts first argument?a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the courts analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.In what manner does the petitioner respond to the courts first argument?a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the courts analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.In what manner does the petitioner respond to the courts first argument?a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the courts analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.In what manner does the petitioner respond to the courts first argument?a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the courts analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.In what manner does the petitioner respond to the courts first argument?a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the courts analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.In what manner does the petitioner respond to the courts first argument?a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the courts analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.In what manner does the petitioner respond to the courts first argument?a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the courts analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.In what manner does the petitioner respond to the courts first argument?a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the courts analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.In what manner does the petitioner respond to the courts first argument?a)The petitioner answers the two questions raised by the court.b)The petitioner highlights the flaw in the courts analogy and casts a doubt on one of its statements.c)The petitioner first states a general principle and then applies it to the present situation.d)The petitioner attempts to address the questions raised by the court but is unable to because of the general nature of his statements.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup