DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Pretentiousness is always someone elses crime. Its never a felony in the first person. You might cop to the odd personality flaw; the occasional pirouette of self-deprecation is nothing if not good manners. Most likely one of those imperfections nobody minds owning up to, something that looks charming in the right circumstances. Being absent-minded. A bad dancer. Partial to a large gin after work. But being pretentious? Thats premier-league obnoxious, the team-mate of arrogance, condescension, careerism and pomposity. Pretension brunches with fraudulence and snobbery, and shops for baubles with the pseudo and the vacuous. Whatever it is you do, Ill bet youd never think it pretentious. Thats because you do it, and pretension never self-identifies. Pretentiousness happens over there. In the way he writes. In her music taste. In the way they dress. And who hasnt before described a person, place or thing as pretentious?a)Pretentiousness is something that urges for tacit approval but only conjures non-compliant snobberyb)Pretentiousness is something that signifies inner hollowness but on the public side helps maintain a facade of cheerfulness and gleec)Pretentiousness is something that escapes the lens of self-scrutiny but is easy to use as tool to depreciate othersd)Pretentiousness is something that is built on vacuous precepts of low self-esteem that help in poking holes in the personalities of othersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most ...

DIRECTIONS for the question: Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.

Pretentiousness is always someone else's crime. It's never a felony in the first person. You might cop to the odd personality flaw; the occasional pirouette of self-deprecation is nothing if not good manners. Most likely one of those imperfections nobody minds owning up to, something that looks charming in the right circumstances. Being absent-minded. A bad dancer. Partial to a large gin after work. But being pretentious? That's premier-league obnoxious, the team-mate of arrogance, condescension, careerism and pomposity. Pretension brunches with fraudulence and snobbery, and shops for baubles with the pseudo and the vacuous. Whatever it is you do, I'll bet you'd never think it pretentious. That's because you do it, and pretension never self-identifies. Pretentiousness happens over there. In the way he writes. In her music taste. In the way they dress. And who hasn't before described a person, place or thing as pretentious?

a)
Pretentiousness is something that urges for tacit approval but only conjures non-compliant snobbery
b)
Pretentiousness is something that signifies inner hollowness but on the public side helps maintain a facade of cheerfulness and glee
c)
Pretentiousness is something that escapes the lens of self-scrutiny but is easy to use as tool to depreciate others
d)
Pretentiousness is something that is built on vacuous precepts of low self-esteem that help in poking holes in the personalities of others

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most appropriate summary for t...

This is a tough question and one that you should avoid to solve in the first attempt. The language of the question stem as well as the options will pose a severe challenge while attempting this question under time pressure. On close observation, you will see that option 3 is the only that comes close to the main idea of the paragraph.

In this paragraph, the last three lines are pivotal to understand the paragraph meaning:
Pretentiousness is always someone else's crime. It's never a felony in the first person. Pretentiousness happens over there. In the way he writes. In her music taste. In the way they dress. And who hasn't before described a person, place or thing as pretentious?

In this case, the author wishes to communicate that pretentiousness is something that we allege is present in others but we don't acknowledge our own.

Answered by Wizius Careers · View profile

Free Test

FREE

CAT Practice Test - 6
76 Ques | 120 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CAT tests

Community Answer

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most appropriate summary for t...

Explanation:

Summary:
- The paragraph discusses how pretentiousness is often easier to see in others than in oneself.
- It highlights how individuals may readily admit to minor flaws but rarely acknowledge pretentiousness in themselves.
- The text emphasizes that pretentiousness is associated with obnoxious traits like arrogance, condescension, and snobbery.
- It suggests that people tend to use pretentiousness as a tool to criticize others while overlooking it in themselves.

Explanation:
- The paragraph conveys the idea that pretentiousness is a quality that individuals find easier to identify in others than in themselves.
- It suggests that people often overlook their own pretentious behavior while readily pointing it out in others.
- The text emphasizes the negative associations of pretentiousness, such as arrogance and snobbery.
- It implies that pretentiousness may stem from underlying insecurities and is often used as a means to belittle others.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Read the following passage and answer the questions associated with each of them.Pieces of behavior, beliefs, arguments, policies, and other exercises of the human mind may all be described as rational. To accept something as rational is to accept it as making sense, as appropriate, or required, or in accordance with some acknowledged goal, such as aiming at truth or aiming at the good.The contrast between "rational coherence" and "reason", might be questioned. In principle, the answer to this question might perfectly coincide: that what agents have reason, or ought, to do just is what it would be rationally coherent for them to do, and vice versa. In several ways, however, the answers might be expected to diverge.First, even if what one ought to do is just to make one's responses globally coherent, what it takes to make one's responses locally coherent might differ from what it takes to make them globally coherent. By Subjective Desire-Based Theory, what agents have reason, or ought, to do or intend is just what, liven what they believe their circumstances to be, would best satisfy their strongest, present intrinsic desires. Suppose that the agent's strongest, present intrinsic desire is for health. Nevertheless, he intends to have a smoke, believing that lighting up is a necessary means. By Subjective Desire-Based Theory Theory, it is not the case that he ought to intend to light up. If he were globally coherent, the agent would not intend to light up. But if he does form an intention to light up, he achieves a kind local coherence.Second, what the agent has reason, or ought, to do or intend may depend not on what she believes her circumstances to be, but on something more "objective." What an agent has reason, or ought, to do, might be what the evidence (where this depends on something other than her attitudes) available to the agent suggests about her circumstances, what the evidence of the person making the reason- or ought-claim suggests about the agent's circumstances, what the evidence of the person assessing the claim suggests about the agent's circumstances, or all of the relevant facts about the agent's circumstances. Consider the Objective Desire-Based Theory-agents have reason, or ought, to do or intend just what, given what their circumstances actually are, would best satisfy their strongest, present intrinsic desires taken as a whole. Suppose the agent's strongest, present intrinsic desire is to drink a gin and tonic, and she so intends. However, she mistakenly believes that the stuff in this bottle is gin, when it is in fact petrol. So she believes that mixing the stuff with tonic is a means to drinking a gin and tonic. According to the Objective Desire-Based Theory, she does not have reason to intend to mix the stuff with tonic and drink it. But if she does so intend, she might be said to have achieved a kind of rational coherence, both local and global.Third, one might hold not a Desire-Based Theory, but a Value-Based Theory-whatever ultimate ends an agent has reason, or ought, to achieve depend not on what she desires or wills, but instead on what is of independent value. Suppose the madman's strongest, present intrinsic desire is to set off a nuclear war, and he so intends. Moreover, the madman knows that intending to press this button is a necessary and sufficient means to setting off a nuclear war. In intending to press this button, the madman would achieve a kind of coherence, both local and global. By Desire-Based Theories, the madman ought so to intend. By Value-Based Theory, this is not the case.There are several reasons to expect at least some divergence between what one has reason, or ought, to do or intend, and what it would be rationality coherent for one to do or intend. But that is perfectly compatible with partial convergence. Among the things that agents have reason, or ought, to do or intend is precisely to make their responses rationally coherent. Just as we ought not to torture, or ought to care for our children, we ought to be rationally coherent.Q. What according to the author is the relation between rational coherence and reason?

View answer

Read the following passage and answer the questions associated with each of them.Pieces of behavior, beliefs, arguments, policies, and other exercises of the human mind may all be described as rational. To accept something as rational is to accept it as making sense, as appropriate, or required, or in accordance with some acknowledged goal, such as aiming at truth or aiming at the good.The contrast between "rational coherence" and "reason", might be questioned. In principle, the answer to this question might perfectly coincide: that what agents have reason, or ought, to do just is what it would be rationally coherent for them to do, and vice versa. In several ways, however, the answers might be expected to diverge.First, even if what one ought to do is just to make one's responses globally coherent, what it takes to make one's responses locally coherent might differ from what it takes to make them globally coherent. By Subjective Desire-Based Theory, what agents have reason, or ought, to do or intend is just what, liven what they believe their circumstances to be, would best satisfy their strongest, present intrinsic desires. Suppose that the agent's strongest, present intrinsic desire is for health. Nevertheless, he intends to have a smoke, believing that lighting up is a necessary means. By Subjective Desire-Based Theory Theory, it is not the case that he ought to intend to light up. If he were globally coherent, the agent would not intend to light up. But if he does form an intention to light up, he achieves a kind local coherence.Second, what the agent has reason, or ought, to do or intend may depend not on what she believes her circumstances to be, but on something more "objective." What an agent has reason, or ought, to do, might be what the evidence (where this depends on something other than her attitudes) available to the agent suggests about her circumstances, what the evidence of the person making the reason- or ought-claim suggests about the agent's circumstances, what the evidence of the person assessing the claim suggests about the agent's circumstances, or all of the relevant facts about the agent's circumstances. Consider the Objective Desire-Based Theory-agents have reason, or ought, to do or intend just what, given what their circumstances actually are, would best satisfy their strongest, present intrinsic desires taken as a whole. Suppose the agent's strongest, present intrinsic desire is to drink a gin and tonic, and she so intends. However, she mistakenly believes that the stuff in this bottle is gin, when it is in fact petrol. So she believes that mixing the stuff with tonic is a means to drinking a gin and tonic. According to the Objective Desire-Based Theory, she does not have reason to intend to mix the stuff with tonic and drink it. But if she does so intend, she might be said to have achieved a kind of rational coherence, both local and global.Third, one might hold not a Desire-Based Theory, but a Value-Based Theory-whatever ultimate ends an agent has reason, or ought, to achieve depend not on what she desires or wills, but instead on what is of independent value. Suppose the madman's strongest, present intrinsic desire is to set off a nuclear war, and he so intends. Moreover, the madman knows that intending to press this button is a necessary and sufficient means to setting off a nuclear war. In intending to press this button, the madman would achieve a kind of coherence, both local and global. By Desire-Based Theories, the madman ought so to intend. By Value-Based Theory, this is not the case.There are several reasons to expect at least some divergence between what one has reason, or ought, to do or intend, and what it would be rationality coherent for one to do or intend. But that is perfectly compatible with partial convergence. Among the things that agents have reason, or ought, to do or intend is precisely to make their responses rationally coherent. Just as we ought not to torture, or ought to care for our children, we ought to be rationally coherent.Q. What is the. difference between rational local coherence and rational global coherence?

View answer

Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Q.The author of this passage is least likely to agree with which of the following statements?

View answer

Directions: The passage below is followed by a question based on its content. Answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage.Laws directly tell us how to behave (or not to behav e) under various specific circumstances and prescribe remedies or punishments for individuals who do not comply with the law. It can be defined as a binding custom or practice of a community: a rule of conduct or action prescribed or formally recognized as binding or enforced by a controlling authority Legal principles are often derived from ethical ones, but legal principles deal more with the practical regulation of morality, or behaviors and activities. Additionally many legal principles deal with the inadequacies and imperfections in human nature, and the less than ideal behaviors of individuals or groups. Legal practices are also affected more by historical precedent, matters of definition, issues related to detectability and enforceability and evolution of new circumstances than are ethical ones.Law is also defined as a body of enacted or customary rules recognized by a community as binding. The law of the Medes and the Persians were regarded as unalterable. While in ancient times the king laid down the law and the people implicitly obeyed him, in modem times laws are made by legislatures, popularly elected or partially nominated. These laws, whatever their source, are binding injunctions; if they were not binding and if their compliance with them were not obligatory, they would not be laws but mere wishes which could be treated as optional. It is the element of compulsion that distinguishes a law from an ordinary directive or expression of desire. Laws enacted by legislatures have also to be distinguished from laws of nature which indicates regularity and invariable sequence between specified conditions and specified phenomena.All man–made laws are designed to regulate human conduct in the interest of society. In absence of such rules each person would regard himself free to do what he likes, regardless of impact of his actions on others corresponding right of freedom of action. In fact, the very existence of society would be endangered if there were no universally recognized laws. A lawless society would mean endless confusion, possibly a reign of terror, and might result in a terrible mess where the only effective law of the jungle. Before regular laws were enacted and enforced, might was right: the physically stronger individual dominated the set–up and the weak person had perforce to surrender to the wishes of the might one or get destroyed. Laws thus enforce justice; provide equal rights and opportunities to everyone, weak or strong, male or female, rich or poor.Q.Which of these would not be an outcome of absence of laws?

View answer

Directions: Read the passage given below and answer the questions with the most appropriate choice.Every living creature was at some stage of its life nothing more than a single cell. It is generally known that human beings result from the union of an egg-cell and a sperm-cell, but it is not so universally understood that these germ-cells are part of a continuous stream of germ-plasm which has been in existence ever since the appearance of life on the globe, and which is destined to continue in existence as long as life remains on the globe. The corollaries of this fact are of great importance.Early investigators tended naturally to look on the germ-cells as a product of the body. Being supposedly products of the body, it was natural to think that they would in some measure reproduce the character of the body which created them; and Darwin elaborated an ingenious hypothesis to explain how the various characters could be represented in the germ-cell. The idea held by him, in common with most other thinkers of his period, is still held more or less unconsciously by those who have not given particular attention to the subject. Generation is conceived as a direct chain: the body produces the germ-cell which produces another body which in turn produces another germ-cell, and so on.But a generation ago this idea fell under suspicion. August Weismann, professor of zoölogy in the University of Freiburg, Germany, made himself the champion of the new idea, about 1885, and developed it so effectively that it is now a part of the creed of nearly every biologist. Weismann caused a general abandonment of the idea that the germ-cell is produced by the body in each generation, and popularized the conception of the germ-cell as a product of a stream of undifferentiated germ-plasm, not only continuous but (potentially at least) immortal. The body does not produce the germ-cells, he pointed out; instead, the germ-cells produce the body.The basis of this theory can best be understood by a brief consideration of the reproduction of very simple organisms. "Death is the end of life," is the belief of many other persons than the Lotus Eaters. It is commonly supposed that everything which lives must eventually die. But study of a one-celled animal, an Infusorian, for example, reveals that when it reaches a certain age it pinches in two, and each half becomes an Infusorian in all appearance identical with the original cell. Has the parent cell then died? It may rather be said to survive, in two parts. Each of these daughter cells will in turn go through the same process of reproduction by simple fission, and the process will be continued in their descendants. The Infusorian can be called potentially immortal, because of this method of reproduction.The immortality, as Weismann pointed out, is not of the kind attributed by the Greeks to their gods, who could not die because no wound could destroy them. On the contrary, the Infusorian is extremely fragile, and is dying by millions at every instant; but if circumstances are favorable, it can live on; it is not inevitably doomed to die sooner or later, as is Man. "It dies from accident often, from old age never." Now the single-celled Infusorian is in many respects comparable with the single-celled germ of the higher animals. The analogy has often been carried too far; yet it remains indisputable that the germ-cells of men reproduce in the same way - by simple fission - as the Infusorian and other one-celled animals and plants, and that they are organized on much the same plan. Given favorable circumstances, the germ-cell should be expected to be equally immortal. Does it ever find these favorable circumstances?The author of the passage would agree with the statement

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

CAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CAT

Mock Test Series for SNAP

Mock Test Series for XAT

Top Courses for CAT

View all

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Pretentiousness is always someone elses crime. Its never a felony in the first person. You might cop to the odd personality flaw; the occasional pirouette of self-deprecation is nothing if not good manners. Most likely one of those imperfections nobody minds owning up to, something that looks charming in the right circumstances. Being absent-minded. A bad dancer. Partial to a large gin after work. But being pretentious? Thats premier-league obnoxious, the team-mate of arrogance, condescension, careerism and pomposity. Pretension brunches with fraudulence and snobbery, and shops for baubles with the pseudo and the vacuous. Whatever it is you do, Ill bet youd never think it pretentious. Thats because you do it, and pretension never self-identifies. Pretentiousness happens over there. In the way he writes. In her music taste. In the way they dress. And who hasnt before described a person, place or thing as pretentious?a)Pretentiousness is something that urges for tacit approval but only conjures non-compliant snobberyb)Pretentiousness is something that signifies inner hollowness but on the public side helps maintain a facade of cheerfulness and gleec)Pretentiousness is something that escapes the lens of self-scrutiny but is easy to use as tool to depreciate othersd)Pretentiousness is something that is built on vacuous precepts of low self-esteem that help in poking holes in the personalities of othersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Pretentiousness is always someone elses crime. Its never a felony in the first person. You might cop to the odd personality flaw; the occasional pirouette of self-deprecation is nothing if not good manners. Most likely one of those imperfections nobody minds owning up to, something that looks charming in the right circumstances. Being absent-minded. A bad dancer. Partial to a large gin after work. But being pretentious? Thats premier-league obnoxious, the team-mate of arrogance, condescension, careerism and pomposity. Pretension brunches with fraudulence and snobbery, and shops for baubles with the pseudo and the vacuous. Whatever it is you do, Ill bet youd never think it pretentious. Thats because you do it, and pretension never self-identifies. Pretentiousness happens over there. In the way he writes. In her music taste. In the way they dress. And who hasnt before described a person, place or thing as pretentious?a)Pretentiousness is something that urges for tacit approval but only conjures non-compliant snobberyb)Pretentiousness is something that signifies inner hollowness but on the public side helps maintain a facade of cheerfulness and gleec)Pretentiousness is something that escapes the lens of self-scrutiny but is easy to use as tool to depreciate othersd)Pretentiousness is something that is built on vacuous precepts of low self-esteem that help in poking holes in the personalities of othersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Pretentiousness is always someone elses crime. Its never a felony in the first person. You might cop to the odd personality flaw; the occasional pirouette of self-deprecation is nothing if not good manners. Most likely one of those imperfections nobody minds owning up to, something that looks charming in the right circumstances. Being absent-minded. A bad dancer. Partial to a large gin after work. But being pretentious? Thats premier-league obnoxious, the team-mate of arrogance, condescension, careerism and pomposity. Pretension brunches with fraudulence and snobbery, and shops for baubles with the pseudo and the vacuous. Whatever it is you do, Ill bet youd never think it pretentious. Thats because you do it, and pretension never self-identifies. Pretentiousness happens over there. In the way he writes. In her music taste. In the way they dress. And who hasnt before described a person, place or thing as pretentious?a)Pretentiousness is something that urges for tacit approval but only conjures non-compliant snobberyb)Pretentiousness is something that signifies inner hollowness but on the public side helps maintain a facade of cheerfulness and gleec)Pretentiousness is something that escapes the lens of self-scrutiny but is easy to use as tool to depreciate othersd)Pretentiousness is something that is built on vacuous precepts of low self-esteem that help in poking holes in the personalities of othersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Pretentiousness is always someone elses crime. Its never a felony in the first person. You might cop to the odd personality flaw; the occasional pirouette of self-deprecation is nothing if not good manners. Most likely one of those imperfections nobody minds owning up to, something that looks charming in the right circumstances. Being absent-minded. A bad dancer. Partial to a large gin after work. But being pretentious? Thats premier-league obnoxious, the team-mate of arrogance, condescension, careerism and pomposity. Pretension brunches with fraudulence and snobbery, and shops for baubles with the pseudo and the vacuous. Whatever it is you do, Ill bet youd never think it pretentious. Thats because you do it, and pretension never self-identifies. Pretentiousness happens over there. In the way he writes. In her music taste. In the way they dress. And who hasnt before described a person, place or thing as pretentious?a)Pretentiousness is something that urges for tacit approval but only conjures non-compliant snobberyb)Pretentiousness is something that signifies inner hollowness but on the public side helps maintain a facade of cheerfulness and gleec)Pretentiousness is something that escapes the lens of self-scrutiny but is easy to use as tool to depreciate othersd)Pretentiousness is something that is built on vacuous precepts of low self-esteem that help in poking holes in the personalities of othersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Pretentiousness is always someone elses crime. Its never a felony in the first person. You might cop to the odd personality flaw; the occasional pirouette of self-deprecation is nothing if not good manners. Most likely one of those imperfections nobody minds owning up to, something that looks charming in the right circumstances. Being absent-minded. A bad dancer. Partial to a large gin after work. But being pretentious? Thats premier-league obnoxious, the team-mate of arrogance, condescension, careerism and pomposity. Pretension brunches with fraudulence and snobbery, and shops for baubles with the pseudo and the vacuous. Whatever it is you do, Ill bet youd never think it pretentious. Thats because you do it, and pretension never self-identifies. Pretentiousness happens over there. In the way he writes. In her music taste. In the way they dress. And who hasnt before described a person, place or thing as pretentious?a)Pretentiousness is something that urges for tacit approval but only conjures non-compliant snobberyb)Pretentiousness is something that signifies inner hollowness but on the public side helps maintain a facade of cheerfulness and gleec)Pretentiousness is something that escapes the lens of self-scrutiny but is easy to use as tool to depreciate othersd)Pretentiousness is something that is built on vacuous precepts of low self-esteem that help in poking holes in the personalities of othersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Pretentiousness is always someone elses crime. Its never a felony in the first person. You might cop to the odd personality flaw; the occasional pirouette of self-deprecation is nothing if not good manners. Most likely one of those imperfections nobody minds owning up to, something that looks charming in the right circumstances. Being absent-minded. A bad dancer. Partial to a large gin after work. But being pretentious? Thats premier-league obnoxious, the team-mate of arrogance, condescension, careerism and pomposity. Pretension brunches with fraudulence and snobbery, and shops for baubles with the pseudo and the vacuous. Whatever it is you do, Ill bet youd never think it pretentious. Thats because you do it, and pretension never self-identifies. Pretentiousness happens over there. In the way he writes. In her music taste. In the way they dress. And who hasnt before described a person, place or thing as pretentious?a)Pretentiousness is something that urges for tacit approval but only conjures non-compliant snobberyb)Pretentiousness is something that signifies inner hollowness but on the public side helps maintain a facade of cheerfulness and gleec)Pretentiousness is something that escapes the lens of self-scrutiny but is easy to use as tool to depreciate othersd)Pretentiousness is something that is built on vacuous precepts of low self-esteem that help in poking holes in the personalities of othersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Pretentiousness is always someone elses crime. Its never a felony in the first person. You might cop to the odd personality flaw; the occasional pirouette of self-deprecation is nothing if not good manners. Most likely one of those imperfections nobody minds owning up to, something that looks charming in the right circumstances. Being absent-minded. A bad dancer. Partial to a large gin after work. But being pretentious? Thats premier-league obnoxious, the team-mate of arrogance, condescension, careerism and pomposity. Pretension brunches with fraudulence and snobbery, and shops for baubles with the pseudo and the vacuous. Whatever it is you do, Ill bet youd never think it pretentious. Thats because you do it, and pretension never self-identifies. Pretentiousness happens over there. In the way he writes. In her music taste. In the way they dress. And who hasnt before described a person, place or thing as pretentious?a)Pretentiousness is something that urges for tacit approval but only conjures non-compliant snobberyb)Pretentiousness is something that signifies inner hollowness but on the public side helps maintain a facade of cheerfulness and gleec)Pretentiousness is something that escapes the lens of self-scrutiny but is easy to use as tool to depreciate othersd)Pretentiousness is something that is built on vacuous precepts of low self-esteem that help in poking holes in the personalities of othersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Pretentiousness is always someone elses crime. Its never a felony in the first person. You might cop to the odd personality flaw; the occasional pirouette of self-deprecation is nothing if not good manners. Most likely one of those imperfections nobody minds owning up to, something that looks charming in the right circumstances. Being absent-minded. A bad dancer. Partial to a large gin after work. But being pretentious? Thats premier-league obnoxious, the team-mate of arrogance, condescension, careerism and pomposity. Pretension brunches with fraudulence and snobbery, and shops for baubles with the pseudo and the vacuous. Whatever it is you do, Ill bet youd never think it pretentious. Thats because you do it, and pretension never self-identifies. Pretentiousness happens over there. In the way he writes. In her music taste. In the way they dress. And who hasnt before described a person, place or thing as pretentious?a)Pretentiousness is something that urges for tacit approval but only conjures non-compliant snobberyb)Pretentiousness is something that signifies inner hollowness but on the public side helps maintain a facade of cheerfulness and gleec)Pretentiousness is something that escapes the lens of self-scrutiny but is easy to use as tool to depreciate othersd)Pretentiousness is something that is built on vacuous precepts of low self-esteem that help in poking holes in the personalities of othersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Pretentiousness is always someone elses crime. Its never a felony in the first person. You might cop to the odd personality flaw; the occasional pirouette of self-deprecation is nothing if not good manners. Most likely one of those imperfections nobody minds owning up to, something that looks charming in the right circumstances. Being absent-minded. A bad dancer. Partial to a large gin after work. But being pretentious? Thats premier-league obnoxious, the team-mate of arrogance, condescension, careerism and pomposity. Pretension brunches with fraudulence and snobbery, and shops for baubles with the pseudo and the vacuous. Whatever it is you do, Ill bet youd never think it pretentious. Thats because you do it, and pretension never self-identifies. Pretentiousness happens over there. In the way he writes. In her music taste. In the way they dress. And who hasnt before described a person, place or thing as pretentious?a)Pretentiousness is something that urges for tacit approval but only conjures non-compliant snobberyb)Pretentiousness is something that signifies inner hollowness but on the public side helps maintain a facade of cheerfulness and gleec)Pretentiousness is something that escapes the lens of self-scrutiny but is easy to use as tool to depreciate othersd)Pretentiousness is something that is built on vacuous precepts of low self-esteem that help in poking holes in the personalities of othersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice DIRECTIONSfor the question:Identify the most appropriate summary for the paragraph.Pretentiousness is always someone elses crime. Its never a felony in the first person. You might cop to the odd personality flaw; the occasional pirouette of self-deprecation is nothing if not good manners. Most likely one of those imperfections nobody minds owning up to, something that looks charming in the right circumstances. Being absent-minded. A bad dancer. Partial to a large gin after work. But being pretentious? Thats premier-league obnoxious, the team-mate of arrogance, condescension, careerism and pomposity. Pretension brunches with fraudulence and snobbery, and shops for baubles with the pseudo and the vacuous. Whatever it is you do, Ill bet youd never think it pretentious. Thats because you do it, and pretension never self-identifies. Pretentiousness happens over there. In the way he writes. In her music taste. In the way they dress. And who hasnt before described a person, place or thing as pretentious?a)Pretentiousness is something that urges for tacit approval but only conjures non-compliant snobberyb)Pretentiousness is something that signifies inner hollowness but on the public side helps maintain a facade of cheerfulness and gleec)Pretentiousness is something that escapes the lens of self-scrutiny but is easy to use as tool to depreciate othersd)Pretentiousness is something that is built on vacuous precepts of low self-esteem that help in poking holes in the personalities of othersCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam