(A) Narendra Modiandrsquo;s vision of andlsquo;Smart Citiesandrsquo; will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.a)IJIJb)IFIFc)IFIJd)JJJJCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses CLAT Exam CLAT Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > (A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Sm...

(A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources
(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.
(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.
(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.

a)
IJIJ
b)
IFIF
c)
IFIJ
d)
JJJJ

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

(A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will ce...

Explanation:

Given Statements:
(A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources
(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.
(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.
(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.

Analysis:
- Statement (A) talks about the potential benefits of Narendra Modi's 'Smart Cities' vision.
- Statement (B) mentions a historical event, the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.
- Statement (C) states a general fact about earthquakes causing geographical changes.
- Statement (D) makes a claim about a specific boy being the most intelligent in the class.

Logical Connection:
- Among the given statements, only statement (C) directly talks about a cause and effect relationship. Earthquakes are known to cause geographical changes due to the shifting of tectonic plates and other factors. This makes statement (C) the most logical choice.
- Statements (A), (B), and (D) do not establish a cause and effect relationship in the same clear and direct manner as statement (C) does.
Therefore, the correct answer is:

Option C) IFIJ

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

Test: Fact, Inference And Judgment
10 Ques | 10 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

(A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will ce...

I – The first half is a fact from which the second half of the statement is inferred.
F – This is a verifiable fact.
I – ‘If there is an Earthquake’ is a fact from which the second half of the statement is inferred.
J – Intelligence is a subjective term on which different people may have different opinions.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

[1]Studies of brain evolution are compelling because of their implications for understanding human evolution. [2]Consequently, researchers are motivated by a desire to find the causes of intelligence. [3]What is intelligence? [4]It is inevitably described with respect to human attributes; we consider ourselves intelligent, and we therefore compare other species to ourselves. [5]This view is legitimized by the fact that humans do have very sophisticated brains, exhibit extraordinarily complex behavior, and cope well in novel situations, generalizing from one problem to another.[6]Unfortunately, criteria applicable to humans are not necessarily appropriate for evaluating traits of other organisms. [7]There is no basis for the assumption that all intelligence is human-like intelligence, nor even for the preconception that all primate intelligence is human-like. [8]To say that intellectual prowess is comparative across species and to use humans as the basis for comparison is a continuation of pre-Darwinian ideas of a scala naturae dealing with intelligence. [9]If ranking species in a single phylogenetic line according to criteria based on the extant member is questionable, then certainly since ecological conditions and selection pressures change over time, ranking contemporary species separated by millions of years of evolution based on the traits exhibited by one is unjustifiable. [10]To assume a continuum of intelligence across today's species is incompatible with an evolutionary perspective, and this preconception must not be allowed to guide studies of brain evolution. [11]The information-processing systems of different animals have been designed to respond to different stimuli, diverse ""cognitive substrates,"" and therefore expectations of an interspecific regularity between these IPS and various other body measures are ill-conceived.[12]What # lacking # a good definition # intelligence that will allow us # say something # how an animal copes # its own ecology and not how closely # approximates human behavior. [13]There are undeniable trends in the history of life -- towards larger brains in mammals and larger neocortices in primates -- but to generalize correlations of these trends into a concept of intelligence should not be attempted until an accurate definition is developed. [14]Until that time, the most that comparative brain size studies can do is demonstrate correlations and thereby pose questions for scientists who focus on the evolution of species with one of these correlated characteristics.Q. The initial definition of ‘Intelligence’ is given with respect to Humans. This is considered acceptable to some because?

View answer

[1]Studies of brain evolution are compelling because of their implications for understanding human evolution. [2]Consequently, researchers are motivated by a desire to find the causes of intelligence. [3]What is intelligence? [4]It is inevitably described with respect to human attributes; we consider ourselves intelligent, and we therefore compare other species to ourselves. [5]This view is legitimized by the fact that humans do have very sophisticated brains, exhibit extraordinarily complex behavior, and cope well in novel situations, generalizing from one problem to another.[6]Unfortunately, criteria applicable to humans are not necessarily appropriate for evaluating traits of other organisms. [7]There is no basis for the assumption that all intelligence is human-like intelligence, nor even for the preconception that all primate intelligence is human-like. [8]To say that intellectual prowess is comparative across species and to use humans as the basis for comparison is a continuation of pre-Darwinian ideas of a scala naturae dealing with intelligence. [9]If ranking species in a single phylogenetic line according to criteria based on the extant member is questionable, then certainly since ecological conditions and selection pressures change over time, ranking contemporary species separated by millions of years of evolution based on the traits exhibited by one is unjustifiable. [10]To assume a continuum of intelligence across today's species is incompatible with an evolutionary perspective, and this preconception must not be allowed to guide studies of brain evolution. [11]The information-processing systems of different animals have been designed to respond to different stimuli, diverse ""cognitive substrates,"" and therefore expectations of an interspecific regularity between these IPS and various other body measures are ill-conceived.[12]What # lacking # a good definition # intelligence that will allow us # say something # how an animal copes # its own ecology and not how closely # approximates human behavior. [13]There are undeniable trends in the history of life -- towards larger brains in mammals and larger neocortices in primates -- but to generalize correlations of these trends into a concept of intelligence should not be attempted until an accurate definition is developed. [14]Until that time, the most that comparative brain size studies can do is demonstrate correlations and thereby pose questions for scientists who focus on the evolution of species with one of these correlated characteristics.Q. The primary function of the paragraph is to?

View answer

[1]Studies of brain evolution are compelling because of their implications for understanding human evolution. [2]Consequently, researchers are motivated by a desire to find the causes of intelligence. [3]What is intelligence? [4]It is inevitably described with respect to human attributes; we consider ourselves intelligent, and we therefore compare other species to ourselves. [5]This view is legitimized by the fact that humans do have very sophisticated brains, exhibit extraordinarily complex behavior, and cope well in novel situations, generalizing from one problem to another.[6]Unfortunately, criteria applicable to humans are not necessarily appropriate for evaluating traits of other organisms. [7]There is no basis for the assumption that all intelligence is human-like intelligence, nor even for the preconception that all primate intelligence is human-like. [8]To say that intellectual prowess is comparative across species and to use humans as the basis for comparison is a continuation of pre-Darwinian ideas of a scala naturae dealing with intelligence. [9]If ranking species in a single phylogenetic line according to criteria based on the extant member is questionable, then certainly since ecological conditions and selection pressures change over time, ranking contemporary species separated by millions of years of evolution based on the traits exhibited by one is unjustifiable. [10]To assume a continuum of intelligence across today's species is incompatible with an evolutionary perspective, and this preconception must not be allowed to guide studies of brain evolution. [11]The information-processing systems of different animals have been designed to respond to different stimuli, diverse ""cognitive substrates,"" and therefore expectations of an interspecific regularity between these IPS and various other body measures are ill-conceived.[12]What # lacking # a good definition # intelligence that will allow us # say something # how an animal copes # its own ecology and not how closely # approximates human behavior. [13]There are undeniable trends in the history of life -- towards larger brains in mammals and larger neocortices in primates -- but to generalize correlations of these trends into a concept of intelligence should not be attempted until an accurate definition is developed. [14]Until that time, the most that comparative brain size studies can do is demonstrate correlations and thereby pose questions for scientists who focus on the evolution of species with one of these correlated characteristics.Q. Which set of words below contains the correct set of antonyms for all of the following words? Sophisticated, continuation, contemporary, diverse

View answer

[1]Studies of brain evolution are compelling because of their implications for understanding human evolution. [2]Consequently, researchers are motivated by a desire to find the causes of intelligence. [3]What is intelligence? [4]It is inevitably described with respect to human attributes; we consider ourselves intelligent, and we therefore compare other species to ourselves. [5]This view is legitimized by the fact that humans do have very sophisticated brains, exhibit extraordinarily complex behavior, and cope well in novel situations, generalizing from one problem to another.[6]Unfortunately, criteria applicable to humans are not necessarily appropriate for evaluating traits of other organisms. [7]There is no basis for the assumption that all intelligence is human-like intelligence, nor even for the preconception that all primate intelligence is human-like. [8]To say that intellectual prowess is comparative across species and to use humans as the basis for comparison is a continuation of pre-Darwinian ideas of a scala naturae dealing with intelligence. [9]If ranking species in a single phylogenetic line according to criteria based on the extant member is questionable, then certainly since ecological conditions and selection pressures change over time, ranking contemporary species separated by millions of years of evolution based on the traits exhibited by one is unjustifiable. [10]To assume a continuum of intelligence across today's species is incompatible with an evolutionary perspective, and this preconception must not be allowed to guide studies of brain evolution. [11]The information-processing systems of different animals have been designed to respond to different stimuli, diverse ""cognitive substrates,"" and therefore expectations of an interspecific regularity between these IPS and various other body measures are ill-conceived.[12]What # lacking # a good definition # intelligence that will allow us # say something # how an animal copes # its own ecology and not how closely # approximates human behavior. [13]There are undeniable trends in the history of life -- towards larger brains in mammals and larger neocortices in primates -- but to generalize correlations of these trends into a concept of intelligence should not be attempted until an accurate definition is developed. [14]Until that time, the most that comparative brain size studies can do is demonstrate correlations and thereby pose questions for scientists who focus on the evolution of species with one of these correlated characteristics.Q. What do you mean by 'scala naturae'?

View answer

[1]Studies of brain evolution are compelling because of their implications for understanding human evolution. [2]Consequently, researchers are motivated by a desire to find the causes of intelligence. [3]What is intelligence? [4]It is inevitably described with respect to human attributes; we consider ourselves intelligent, and we therefore compare other species to ourselves. [5]This view is legitimized by the fact that humans do have very sophisticated brains, exhibit extraordinarily complex behavior, and cope well in novel situations, generalizing from one problem to another.[6]Unfortunately, criteria applicable to humans are not necessarily appropriate for evaluating traits of other organisms. [7]There is no basis for the assumption that all intelligence is human-like intelligence, nor even for the preconception that all primate intelligence is human-like. [8]To say that intellectual prowess is comparative across species and to use humans as the basis for comparison is a continuation of pre-Darwinian ideas of a scala naturae dealing with intelligence. [9]If ranking species in a single phylogenetic line according to criteria based on the extant member is questionable, then certainly since ecological conditions and selection pressures change over time, ranking contemporary species separated by millions of years of evolution based on the traits exhibited by one is unjustifiable. [10]To assume a continuum of intelligence across today's species is incompatible with an evolutionary perspective, and this preconception must not be allowed to guide studies of brain evolution. [11]The information-processing systems of different animals have been designed to respond to different stimuli, diverse ""cognitive substrates,"" and therefore expectations of an interspecific regularity between these IPS and various other body measures are ill-conceived.[12]What # lacking # a good definition # intelligence that will allow us # say something # how an animal copes # its own ecology and not how closely # approximates human behavior. [13]There are undeniable trends in the history of life -- towards larger brains in mammals and larger neocortices in primates -- but to generalize correlations of these trends into a concept of intelligence should not be attempted until an accurate definition is developed. [14]Until that time, the most that comparative brain size studies can do is demonstrate correlations and thereby pose questions for scientists who focus on the evolution of species with one of these correlated characteristics.Q. The author’s suggestion about brain studies towards the end of the passage is

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Lucent for GK

Top Courses for CLAT

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Lucent for GK

View all

(A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.a)IJIJb)IFIFc)IFIJd)JJJJCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
(A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.a)IJIJb)IFIFc)IFIJd)JJJJCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about (A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.a)IJIJb)IFIFc)IFIJd)JJJJCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for (A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.a)IJIJb)IFIFc)IFIJd)JJJJCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for (A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.a)IJIJb)IFIFc)IFIJd)JJJJCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of (A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.a)IJIJb)IFIFc)IFIJd)JJJJCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of (A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.a)IJIJb)IFIFc)IFIJd)JJJJCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for (A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.a)IJIJb)IFIFc)IFIJd)JJJJCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of (A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.a)IJIJb)IFIFc)IFIJd)JJJJCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice (A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.a)IJIJb)IFIFc)IFIJd)JJJJCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.