UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > Read the following passageand answer the item...
Start Learning for Free
Read the following passage and answer the item that follow. Your answer to these item should be based on the passage only.
Passage-5
In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, India's story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. India's poverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.
2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.
3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.
4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for India's poverty reduction.
2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.
3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.
4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for India's poverty reduction.
Which of the above assumptions are valid?
- a)1 and 3
- b)2 and 4
- c)2 and 3
- d)3 and 4
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answert...
The valid assumptions based on the passage are:
b) 2 and 4: A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture, and higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for India's poverty reduction.
The passage states that India's poverty reduction accelerated dramatically during 2005-2012, when the relative price scenario changed significantly in favor of agriculture, leading to a boost in private investments in agriculture by more than 50%. This resulted in an increase in agri-GDP growth, higher farm wages, and a net surplus in agri-trade, which led to an unprecedented fall in poverty. Therefore, it can be inferred that a good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture and higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for poverty reduction.
Assumptions 1 and 3 are not explicitly mentioned in the passage. While the passage states that India's story of structural and rural transformation is slow compared to China and Vietnam, it does not make the assumption that such transformation is impossible with small and marginal farms. Similarly, while the passage mentions the growth of agri-GDP and trade, it does not specifically mention the need to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.
Most Upvoted Answer
Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answert...
Explanation:
Assumption 1:
- This assumption is invalid based on the passage. The passage mentions that India experienced slow transformation in its agriculture sector despite having mainly small and marginal farms. Therefore, structural and rural transformation is not impossible even with small and marginal farms.
Assumption 2:
- This assumption is valid based on the passage. The passage highlights how a good price incentive led to increased private investments in agriculture in India, ultimately resulting in accelerated poverty reduction. This shows that price incentives can indeed trigger investments in agriculture.
Assumption 3:
- This assumption is invalid based on the passage. While the passage discusses the positive impact of investments in agriculture triggered by price incentives, it does not specifically mention the need for building value chains for high-value agricultural products like livestock and horticulture.
Assumption 4:
- This assumption is invalid based on the passage. The passage mentions that higher global prices of agricultural commodities played a significant role in boosting private investments in agriculture in India. However, it does not state that higher global prices are essential for India's poverty reduction.
Therefore, based on the passage, Assumptions 2 and 4 are valid.
Assumption 1:
- This assumption is invalid based on the passage. The passage mentions that India experienced slow transformation in its agriculture sector despite having mainly small and marginal farms. Therefore, structural and rural transformation is not impossible even with small and marginal farms.
Assumption 2:
- This assumption is valid based on the passage. The passage highlights how a good price incentive led to increased private investments in agriculture in India, ultimately resulting in accelerated poverty reduction. This shows that price incentives can indeed trigger investments in agriculture.
Assumption 3:
- This assumption is invalid based on the passage. While the passage discusses the positive impact of investments in agriculture triggered by price incentives, it does not specifically mention the need for building value chains for high-value agricultural products like livestock and horticulture.
Assumption 4:
- This assumption is invalid based on the passage. The passage mentions that higher global prices of agricultural commodities played a significant role in boosting private investments in agriculture in India. However, it does not state that higher global prices are essential for India's poverty reduction.
Therefore, based on the passage, Assumptions 2 and 4 are valid.
Attention UPSC Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Top Courses for UPSCView all
Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answerto these itemshould be based on the passageonly.Passage-5In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, Indias story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. Indiaspoverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for Indias poverty reduction.Which of the above assumptions are valid?a)1 and 3b)2 and 4c)2 and 3d)3 and 4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answerto these itemshould be based on the passageonly.Passage-5In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, Indias story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. Indiaspoverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for Indias poverty reduction.Which of the above assumptions are valid?a)1 and 3b)2 and 4c)2 and 3d)3 and 4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answerto these itemshould be based on the passageonly.Passage-5In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, Indias story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. Indiaspoverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for Indias poverty reduction.Which of the above assumptions are valid?a)1 and 3b)2 and 4c)2 and 3d)3 and 4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answerto these itemshould be based on the passageonly.Passage-5In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, Indias story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. Indiaspoverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for Indias poverty reduction.Which of the above assumptions are valid?a)1 and 3b)2 and 4c)2 and 3d)3 and 4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answerto these itemshould be based on the passageonly.Passage-5In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, Indias story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. Indiaspoverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for Indias poverty reduction.Which of the above assumptions are valid?a)1 and 3b)2 and 4c)2 and 3d)3 and 4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answerto these itemshould be based on the passageonly.Passage-5In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, Indias story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. Indiaspoverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for Indias poverty reduction.Which of the above assumptions are valid?a)1 and 3b)2 and 4c)2 and 3d)3 and 4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answerto these itemshould be based on the passageonly.Passage-5In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, Indias story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. Indiaspoverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for Indias poverty reduction.Which of the above assumptions are valid?a)1 and 3b)2 and 4c)2 and 3d)3 and 4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answerto these itemshould be based on the passageonly.Passage-5In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, Indias story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. Indiaspoverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for Indias poverty reduction.Which of the above assumptions are valid?a)1 and 3b)2 and 4c)2 and 3d)3 and 4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answerto these itemshould be based on the passageonly.Passage-5In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, Indias story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. Indiaspoverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for Indias poverty reduction.Which of the above assumptions are valid?a)1 and 3b)2 and 4c)2 and 3d)3 and 4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answerto these itemshould be based on the passageonly.Passage-5In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, Indias story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. Indiaspoverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for Indias poverty reduction.Which of the above assumptions are valid?a)1 and 3b)2 and 4c)2 and 3d)3 and 4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answerto these itemshould be based on the passageonly.Passage-5In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, Indias story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. Indiaspoverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for Indias poverty reduction.Which of the above assumptions are valid?a)1 and 3b)2 and 4c)2 and 3d)3 and 4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answerto these itemshould be based on the passageonly.Passage-5In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, Indias story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. Indiaspoverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for Indias poverty reduction.Which of the above assumptions are valid?a)1 and 3b)2 and 4c)2 and 3d)3 and 4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Read the following passageand answer the itemthat follow. Your answerto these itemshould be based on the passageonly.Passage-5In India, agriculture still engages about half of workforce, and about 85 per cent of its farms mall and marginal. Compared to China Vietnam, which have experienced fast structural and rural transformation, Indias story is of slow transformation. As a result, poverty reduction in India was at a much slower pace during 1988—2014, compared to China and Vietnam. Indiaspoverty reduction was slow during 1988-2005, but during 2005-2012, it accelerated dramatically—almost three times faster than during the earlier period. What did India do during this period? Research reveals that the relative price scenario changed significantly (by more than 50%) in favour of agriculture in the wake of rising global prices. This boosted private investments in agriculture by more than 5o%. As a result, agri-GDP growth touched 4/1% during 2007-2012 as against 2.4% during 2002—2007. The net surplus or agri-trade touched $25 billion in 2013-2014: real farm wages rose by 7% per annum. All this led to unprecedented fall in poverty.With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:1. Structural and rural transformation is impossible when farms are mainly small arid marginal.2. A good price incentive can trigger investments in agriculture.3. India needs to build value chains for high-value agri-products like livestock and horticulture.4. Higher global prices of agricultural commodities are essential for Indias poverty reduction.Which of the above assumptions are valid?a)1 and 3b)2 and 4c)2 and 3d)3 and 4Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup