Question Description
Principle:Whoever stores a substance that could potentially cause damage on escape shallbe absolutely liable for any damage caused by the escape of such substance from its premises. The person will be liable for the tort of negligence.Facts: Prerna and Anurag decide to buy a mini- chemical capsule for their scientific experiments. The minuscule capsule has great potentiality for damage if broken, and hence Prerna and Anurag take complete precautions against that. However, one day the capsule breaks due to an earthquake. Their neighbour, Bajaj, rushes into their premises to check what caused the loud sound that accompanied the breakage of the object. Prerna and Anurag ensure that the damage is contained within the premises of the room. However, their neighbour, Bajaj, sues them for the damage caused to him due to contact with the toxic object.a)Bajaj was responsible for entering their premises and cannot sue Prerna or Anurag forhis stupidity.b)The object did not escape the premises, and hence Prerna and Anurag would not beliable.c)The act of keeping a dangerous object would in itself make Prerna and Anurag absolutelyliable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle:Whoever stores a substance that could potentially cause damage on escape shallbe absolutely liable for any damage caused by the escape of such substance from its premises. The person will be liable for the tort of negligence.Facts: Prerna and Anurag decide to buy a mini- chemical capsule for their scientific experiments. The minuscule capsule has great potentiality for damage if broken, and hence Prerna and Anurag take complete precautions against that. However, one day the capsule breaks due to an earthquake. Their neighbour, Bajaj, rushes into their premises to check what caused the loud sound that accompanied the breakage of the object. Prerna and Anurag ensure that the damage is contained within the premises of the room. However, their neighbour, Bajaj, sues them for the damage caused to him due to contact with the toxic object.a)Bajaj was responsible for entering their premises and cannot sue Prerna or Anurag forhis stupidity.b)The object did not escape the premises, and hence Prerna and Anurag would not beliable.c)The act of keeping a dangerous object would in itself make Prerna and Anurag absolutelyliable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle:Whoever stores a substance that could potentially cause damage on escape shallbe absolutely liable for any damage caused by the escape of such substance from its premises. The person will be liable for the tort of negligence.Facts: Prerna and Anurag decide to buy a mini- chemical capsule for their scientific experiments. The minuscule capsule has great potentiality for damage if broken, and hence Prerna and Anurag take complete precautions against that. However, one day the capsule breaks due to an earthquake. Their neighbour, Bajaj, rushes into their premises to check what caused the loud sound that accompanied the breakage of the object. Prerna and Anurag ensure that the damage is contained within the premises of the room. However, their neighbour, Bajaj, sues them for the damage caused to him due to contact with the toxic object.a)Bajaj was responsible for entering their premises and cannot sue Prerna or Anurag forhis stupidity.b)The object did not escape the premises, and hence Prerna and Anurag would not beliable.c)The act of keeping a dangerous object would in itself make Prerna and Anurag absolutelyliable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle:Whoever stores a substance that could potentially cause damage on escape shallbe absolutely liable for any damage caused by the escape of such substance from its premises. The person will be liable for the tort of negligence.Facts: Prerna and Anurag decide to buy a mini- chemical capsule for their scientific experiments. The minuscule capsule has great potentiality for damage if broken, and hence Prerna and Anurag take complete precautions against that. However, one day the capsule breaks due to an earthquake. Their neighbour, Bajaj, rushes into their premises to check what caused the loud sound that accompanied the breakage of the object. Prerna and Anurag ensure that the damage is contained within the premises of the room. However, their neighbour, Bajaj, sues them for the damage caused to him due to contact with the toxic object.a)Bajaj was responsible for entering their premises and cannot sue Prerna or Anurag forhis stupidity.b)The object did not escape the premises, and hence Prerna and Anurag would not beliable.c)The act of keeping a dangerous object would in itself make Prerna and Anurag absolutelyliable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle:Whoever stores a substance that could potentially cause damage on escape shallbe absolutely liable for any damage caused by the escape of such substance from its premises. The person will be liable for the tort of negligence.Facts: Prerna and Anurag decide to buy a mini- chemical capsule for their scientific experiments. The minuscule capsule has great potentiality for damage if broken, and hence Prerna and Anurag take complete precautions against that. However, one day the capsule breaks due to an earthquake. Their neighbour, Bajaj, rushes into their premises to check what caused the loud sound that accompanied the breakage of the object. Prerna and Anurag ensure that the damage is contained within the premises of the room. However, their neighbour, Bajaj, sues them for the damage caused to him due to contact with the toxic object.a)Bajaj was responsible for entering their premises and cannot sue Prerna or Anurag forhis stupidity.b)The object did not escape the premises, and hence Prerna and Anurag would not beliable.c)The act of keeping a dangerous object would in itself make Prerna and Anurag absolutelyliable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle:Whoever stores a substance that could potentially cause damage on escape shallbe absolutely liable for any damage caused by the escape of such substance from its premises. The person will be liable for the tort of negligence.Facts: Prerna and Anurag decide to buy a mini- chemical capsule for their scientific experiments. The minuscule capsule has great potentiality for damage if broken, and hence Prerna and Anurag take complete precautions against that. However, one day the capsule breaks due to an earthquake. Their neighbour, Bajaj, rushes into their premises to check what caused the loud sound that accompanied the breakage of the object. Prerna and Anurag ensure that the damage is contained within the premises of the room. However, their neighbour, Bajaj, sues them for the damage caused to him due to contact with the toxic object.a)Bajaj was responsible for entering their premises and cannot sue Prerna or Anurag forhis stupidity.b)The object did not escape the premises, and hence Prerna and Anurag would not beliable.c)The act of keeping a dangerous object would in itself make Prerna and Anurag absolutelyliable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle:Whoever stores a substance that could potentially cause damage on escape shallbe absolutely liable for any damage caused by the escape of such substance from its premises. The person will be liable for the tort of negligence.Facts: Prerna and Anurag decide to buy a mini- chemical capsule for their scientific experiments. The minuscule capsule has great potentiality for damage if broken, and hence Prerna and Anurag take complete precautions against that. However, one day the capsule breaks due to an earthquake. Their neighbour, Bajaj, rushes into their premises to check what caused the loud sound that accompanied the breakage of the object. Prerna and Anurag ensure that the damage is contained within the premises of the room. However, their neighbour, Bajaj, sues them for the damage caused to him due to contact with the toxic object.a)Bajaj was responsible for entering their premises and cannot sue Prerna or Anurag forhis stupidity.b)The object did not escape the premises, and hence Prerna and Anurag would not beliable.c)The act of keeping a dangerous object would in itself make Prerna and Anurag absolutelyliable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle:Whoever stores a substance that could potentially cause damage on escape shallbe absolutely liable for any damage caused by the escape of such substance from its premises. The person will be liable for the tort of negligence.Facts: Prerna and Anurag decide to buy a mini- chemical capsule for their scientific experiments. The minuscule capsule has great potentiality for damage if broken, and hence Prerna and Anurag take complete precautions against that. However, one day the capsule breaks due to an earthquake. Their neighbour, Bajaj, rushes into their premises to check what caused the loud sound that accompanied the breakage of the object. Prerna and Anurag ensure that the damage is contained within the premises of the room. However, their neighbour, Bajaj, sues them for the damage caused to him due to contact with the toxic object.a)Bajaj was responsible for entering their premises and cannot sue Prerna or Anurag forhis stupidity.b)The object did not escape the premises, and hence Prerna and Anurag would not beliable.c)The act of keeping a dangerous object would in itself make Prerna and Anurag absolutelyliable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle:Whoever stores a substance that could potentially cause damage on escape shallbe absolutely liable for any damage caused by the escape of such substance from its premises. The person will be liable for the tort of negligence.Facts: Prerna and Anurag decide to buy a mini- chemical capsule for their scientific experiments. The minuscule capsule has great potentiality for damage if broken, and hence Prerna and Anurag take complete precautions against that. However, one day the capsule breaks due to an earthquake. Their neighbour, Bajaj, rushes into their premises to check what caused the loud sound that accompanied the breakage of the object. Prerna and Anurag ensure that the damage is contained within the premises of the room. However, their neighbour, Bajaj, sues them for the damage caused to him due to contact with the toxic object.a)Bajaj was responsible for entering their premises and cannot sue Prerna or Anurag forhis stupidity.b)The object did not escape the premises, and hence Prerna and Anurag would not beliable.c)The act of keeping a dangerous object would in itself make Prerna and Anurag absolutelyliable.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.