Question Description
Passage - 4A Supreme Court bench of justices L Nageswara Rao and Hemant Gupta ruled that states are not bound to make reservations, nor is reservation in promotions a [1]. The top court said that it cannot order state governments to provide reservations."In view of the law laid down by this court, there is no doubt that the state government is not bound to make reservations. There is no [1 ] which inheres in an individual to claim reservation in promotions. No [2] can be issued by the court directing the state government to provide reservations," the bench said in its order.The state governments can grant reservation to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes at their own discretion, but will have to collect quantifiable data which shows their inadequate representation in public services. The Supreme Court has said that states can grant reservation to certain classes, but "there must be some material on the basis of which the opinion is formed". The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments September 5, 2012 decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The governments decision was challenged in the [3] High Court, which struck it down. The Supreme Court referred to Article [4] and its clauses 4 and 4A while delivering its judgement in the matter. Article [4] in the Constitution of India refers to equality of opportunity in government jobs.Q.The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Which of the following state governments has been redacted with [3] in the passage above?a)Jharkhandb)Uttarakhandc)Bihard)OdishaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Passage - 4A Supreme Court bench of justices L Nageswara Rao and Hemant Gupta ruled that states are not bound to make reservations, nor is reservation in promotions a [1]. The top court said that it cannot order state governments to provide reservations."In view of the law laid down by this court, there is no doubt that the state government is not bound to make reservations. There is no [1 ] which inheres in an individual to claim reservation in promotions. No [2] can be issued by the court directing the state government to provide reservations," the bench said in its order.The state governments can grant reservation to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes at their own discretion, but will have to collect quantifiable data which shows their inadequate representation in public services. The Supreme Court has said that states can grant reservation to certain classes, but "there must be some material on the basis of which the opinion is formed". The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments September 5, 2012 decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The governments decision was challenged in the [3] High Court, which struck it down. The Supreme Court referred to Article [4] and its clauses 4 and 4A while delivering its judgement in the matter. Article [4] in the Constitution of India refers to equality of opportunity in government jobs.Q.The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Which of the following state governments has been redacted with [3] in the passage above?a)Jharkhandb)Uttarakhandc)Bihard)OdishaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Passage - 4A Supreme Court bench of justices L Nageswara Rao and Hemant Gupta ruled that states are not bound to make reservations, nor is reservation in promotions a [1]. The top court said that it cannot order state governments to provide reservations."In view of the law laid down by this court, there is no doubt that the state government is not bound to make reservations. There is no [1 ] which inheres in an individual to claim reservation in promotions. No [2] can be issued by the court directing the state government to provide reservations," the bench said in its order.The state governments can grant reservation to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes at their own discretion, but will have to collect quantifiable data which shows their inadequate representation in public services. The Supreme Court has said that states can grant reservation to certain classes, but "there must be some material on the basis of which the opinion is formed". The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments September 5, 2012 decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The governments decision was challenged in the [3] High Court, which struck it down. The Supreme Court referred to Article [4] and its clauses 4 and 4A while delivering its judgement in the matter. Article [4] in the Constitution of India refers to equality of opportunity in government jobs.Q.The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Which of the following state governments has been redacted with [3] in the passage above?a)Jharkhandb)Uttarakhandc)Bihard)OdishaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Passage - 4A Supreme Court bench of justices L Nageswara Rao and Hemant Gupta ruled that states are not bound to make reservations, nor is reservation in promotions a [1]. The top court said that it cannot order state governments to provide reservations."In view of the law laid down by this court, there is no doubt that the state government is not bound to make reservations. There is no [1 ] which inheres in an individual to claim reservation in promotions. No [2] can be issued by the court directing the state government to provide reservations," the bench said in its order.The state governments can grant reservation to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes at their own discretion, but will have to collect quantifiable data which shows their inadequate representation in public services. The Supreme Court has said that states can grant reservation to certain classes, but "there must be some material on the basis of which the opinion is formed". The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments September 5, 2012 decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The governments decision was challenged in the [3] High Court, which struck it down. The Supreme Court referred to Article [4] and its clauses 4 and 4A while delivering its judgement in the matter. Article [4] in the Constitution of India refers to equality of opportunity in government jobs.Q.The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Which of the following state governments has been redacted with [3] in the passage above?a)Jharkhandb)Uttarakhandc)Bihard)OdishaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Passage - 4A Supreme Court bench of justices L Nageswara Rao and Hemant Gupta ruled that states are not bound to make reservations, nor is reservation in promotions a [1]. The top court said that it cannot order state governments to provide reservations."In view of the law laid down by this court, there is no doubt that the state government is not bound to make reservations. There is no [1 ] which inheres in an individual to claim reservation in promotions. No [2] can be issued by the court directing the state government to provide reservations," the bench said in its order.The state governments can grant reservation to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes at their own discretion, but will have to collect quantifiable data which shows their inadequate representation in public services. The Supreme Court has said that states can grant reservation to certain classes, but "there must be some material on the basis of which the opinion is formed". The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments September 5, 2012 decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The governments decision was challenged in the [3] High Court, which struck it down. The Supreme Court referred to Article [4] and its clauses 4 and 4A while delivering its judgement in the matter. Article [4] in the Constitution of India refers to equality of opportunity in government jobs.Q.The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Which of the following state governments has been redacted with [3] in the passage above?a)Jharkhandb)Uttarakhandc)Bihard)OdishaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Passage - 4A Supreme Court bench of justices L Nageswara Rao and Hemant Gupta ruled that states are not bound to make reservations, nor is reservation in promotions a [1]. The top court said that it cannot order state governments to provide reservations."In view of the law laid down by this court, there is no doubt that the state government is not bound to make reservations. There is no [1 ] which inheres in an individual to claim reservation in promotions. No [2] can be issued by the court directing the state government to provide reservations," the bench said in its order.The state governments can grant reservation to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes at their own discretion, but will have to collect quantifiable data which shows their inadequate representation in public services. The Supreme Court has said that states can grant reservation to certain classes, but "there must be some material on the basis of which the opinion is formed". The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments September 5, 2012 decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The governments decision was challenged in the [3] High Court, which struck it down. The Supreme Court referred to Article [4] and its clauses 4 and 4A while delivering its judgement in the matter. Article [4] in the Constitution of India refers to equality of opportunity in government jobs.Q.The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Which of the following state governments has been redacted with [3] in the passage above?a)Jharkhandb)Uttarakhandc)Bihard)OdishaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Passage - 4A Supreme Court bench of justices L Nageswara Rao and Hemant Gupta ruled that states are not bound to make reservations, nor is reservation in promotions a [1]. The top court said that it cannot order state governments to provide reservations."In view of the law laid down by this court, there is no doubt that the state government is not bound to make reservations. There is no [1 ] which inheres in an individual to claim reservation in promotions. No [2] can be issued by the court directing the state government to provide reservations," the bench said in its order.The state governments can grant reservation to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes at their own discretion, but will have to collect quantifiable data which shows their inadequate representation in public services. The Supreme Court has said that states can grant reservation to certain classes, but "there must be some material on the basis of which the opinion is formed". The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments September 5, 2012 decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The governments decision was challenged in the [3] High Court, which struck it down. The Supreme Court referred to Article [4] and its clauses 4 and 4A while delivering its judgement in the matter. Article [4] in the Constitution of India refers to equality of opportunity in government jobs.Q.The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Which of the following state governments has been redacted with [3] in the passage above?a)Jharkhandb)Uttarakhandc)Bihard)OdishaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Passage - 4A Supreme Court bench of justices L Nageswara Rao and Hemant Gupta ruled that states are not bound to make reservations, nor is reservation in promotions a [1]. The top court said that it cannot order state governments to provide reservations."In view of the law laid down by this court, there is no doubt that the state government is not bound to make reservations. There is no [1 ] which inheres in an individual to claim reservation in promotions. No [2] can be issued by the court directing the state government to provide reservations," the bench said in its order.The state governments can grant reservation to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes at their own discretion, but will have to collect quantifiable data which shows their inadequate representation in public services. The Supreme Court has said that states can grant reservation to certain classes, but "there must be some material on the basis of which the opinion is formed". The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments September 5, 2012 decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The governments decision was challenged in the [3] High Court, which struck it down. The Supreme Court referred to Article [4] and its clauses 4 and 4A while delivering its judgement in the matter. Article [4] in the Constitution of India refers to equality of opportunity in government jobs.Q.The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Which of the following state governments has been redacted with [3] in the passage above?a)Jharkhandb)Uttarakhandc)Bihard)OdishaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Passage - 4A Supreme Court bench of justices L Nageswara Rao and Hemant Gupta ruled that states are not bound to make reservations, nor is reservation in promotions a [1]. The top court said that it cannot order state governments to provide reservations."In view of the law laid down by this court, there is no doubt that the state government is not bound to make reservations. There is no [1 ] which inheres in an individual to claim reservation in promotions. No [2] can be issued by the court directing the state government to provide reservations," the bench said in its order.The state governments can grant reservation to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes at their own discretion, but will have to collect quantifiable data which shows their inadequate representation in public services. The Supreme Court has said that states can grant reservation to certain classes, but "there must be some material on the basis of which the opinion is formed". The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments September 5, 2012 decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The governments decision was challenged in the [3] High Court, which struck it down. The Supreme Court referred to Article [4] and its clauses 4 and 4A while delivering its judgement in the matter. Article [4] in the Constitution of India refers to equality of opportunity in government jobs.Q.The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Which of the following state governments has been redacted with [3] in the passage above?a)Jharkhandb)Uttarakhandc)Bihard)OdishaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.