Question Description
Principle: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.Fact: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.b)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.Fact: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.b)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.Fact: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.b)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.Fact: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.b)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.Fact: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.b)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.Fact: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.b)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.Fact: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.b)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.Fact: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.b)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.Fact: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.b)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.c)X has not committed any wrong.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.