UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > Passage-5In Part III of the constitution whic...
Start Learning for Free
Passage-5
In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.
What is the most logical inference from the above passage?
- a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.
- b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State intervention
- c)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.
- d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain ...
Explanation:
State Intervention in Religious Freedom:
- The passage highlights that the right to religious freedom, as guaranteed by Article 25 of the Constitution, is subject to certain conditions such as public order, morality, health, and other provisions of Part III.
- This indicates that the State can intervene in religious matters if they pose a threat to public order, morality, or health.
Subordination Clause:
- The prefatory rider in Article 25 places other fundamental rights mentioned in Part III above the right to religious freedom.
- This means that the rights to equality before the law and equal protection of laws take precedence over religious freedom.
- The State cannot deny equal protection of laws to any person or group based on religion alone, emphasizing the subordination of religious freedom to other fundamental rights.
Logical Inference:
- Therefore, the most logical inference from the passage is that religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State intervention.
- While individuals are entitled to freedom of conscience and the right to practice religion, the State can intervene if these practices conflict with public order, morality, or other fundamental rights.
In conclusion, the passage underscores the nuanced nature of religious freedom within the legal framework of the Constitution, highlighting the conditions and limitations that govern this fundamental right.
State Intervention in Religious Freedom:
- The passage highlights that the right to religious freedom, as guaranteed by Article 25 of the Constitution, is subject to certain conditions such as public order, morality, health, and other provisions of Part III.
- This indicates that the State can intervene in religious matters if they pose a threat to public order, morality, or health.
Subordination Clause:
- The prefatory rider in Article 25 places other fundamental rights mentioned in Part III above the right to religious freedom.
- This means that the rights to equality before the law and equal protection of laws take precedence over religious freedom.
- The State cannot deny equal protection of laws to any person or group based on religion alone, emphasizing the subordination of religious freedom to other fundamental rights.
Logical Inference:
- Therefore, the most logical inference from the passage is that religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State intervention.
- While individuals are entitled to freedom of conscience and the right to practice religion, the State can intervene if these practices conflict with public order, morality, or other fundamental rights.
In conclusion, the passage underscores the nuanced nature of religious freedom within the legal framework of the Constitution, highlighting the conditions and limitations that govern this fundamental right.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain ...
This means that we can practice our religion in the limits that we can not harm to anyone in the name of our religious practice. State defined in article 12 can interfere if the practice is harmful in any manner.
Attention UPSC Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Similar UPSC Doubts
Top Courses for UPSCView all
Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup