Question Description
Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Passage-5In Part III of the constitution which assures people certain fundamental rights, Article 25 proclaims that “all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion”. What people fail to notice is that this Proclamation is prefixed with the words “subject to public order, morality, health and to the other provisions of this Part”, Which set conditions precedent for the legal protection of religious practices of any Community. The closing words of this prefatory rider in Article 25 virtually constitute a subordination clause placing other fundamental rights mentioned in Part Ill over and above the right to religious freedom. Among those other fundamental rights is the rights to equality before law and equal protection of laws-assured at the outset and elaborated in later articles to mean, inter alia, that the State shall not deny equal protection of laws to any person or group of persons on the basis of religion alone.What is the most logical inference from the above passage?a)State shall not interfere with the religious affairs of the Citizens.b)Religious freedom under the Constitution is open to State interventionc)Religious freedom of the citizens is not covered under fundamental rights.d)Religious practices of any Community are immune to State laws.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.