Question Description
Directions: This question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Statement:Should corporal punishment be banned in schools?Arguments:I. No. Teachers as responsible adults can be trusted with using the punishment only as a last resort, and on a case-to-case basis.II. Yes. Hitting a student is only an easy way out to create an image of trying to change the student, whereas there are better options available for fundamentally changing the behaviour of the student.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: This question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Statement:Should corporal punishment be banned in schools?Arguments:I. No. Teachers as responsible adults can be trusted with using the punishment only as a last resort, and on a case-to-case basis.II. Yes. Hitting a student is only an easy way out to create an image of trying to change the student, whereas there are better options available for fundamentally changing the behaviour of the student.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: This question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Statement:Should corporal punishment be banned in schools?Arguments:I. No. Teachers as responsible adults can be trusted with using the punishment only as a last resort, and on a case-to-case basis.II. Yes. Hitting a student is only an easy way out to create an image of trying to change the student, whereas there are better options available for fundamentally changing the behaviour of the student.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: This question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Statement:Should corporal punishment be banned in schools?Arguments:I. No. Teachers as responsible adults can be trusted with using the punishment only as a last resort, and on a case-to-case basis.II. Yes. Hitting a student is only an easy way out to create an image of trying to change the student, whereas there are better options available for fundamentally changing the behaviour of the student.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: This question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Statement:Should corporal punishment be banned in schools?Arguments:I. No. Teachers as responsible adults can be trusted with using the punishment only as a last resort, and on a case-to-case basis.II. Yes. Hitting a student is only an easy way out to create an image of trying to change the student, whereas there are better options available for fundamentally changing the behaviour of the student.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Directions: This question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Statement:Should corporal punishment be banned in schools?Arguments:I. No. Teachers as responsible adults can be trusted with using the punishment only as a last resort, and on a case-to-case basis.II. Yes. Hitting a student is only an easy way out to create an image of trying to change the student, whereas there are better options available for fundamentally changing the behaviour of the student.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: This question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Statement:Should corporal punishment be banned in schools?Arguments:I. No. Teachers as responsible adults can be trusted with using the punishment only as a last resort, and on a case-to-case basis.II. Yes. Hitting a student is only an easy way out to create an image of trying to change the student, whereas there are better options available for fundamentally changing the behaviour of the student.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: This question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Statement:Should corporal punishment be banned in schools?Arguments:I. No. Teachers as responsible adults can be trusted with using the punishment only as a last resort, and on a case-to-case basis.II. Yes. Hitting a student is only an easy way out to create an image of trying to change the student, whereas there are better options available for fundamentally changing the behaviour of the student.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Directions: This question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.Statement:Should corporal punishment be banned in schools?Arguments:I. No. Teachers as responsible adults can be trusted with using the punishment only as a last resort, and on a case-to-case basis.II. Yes. Hitting a student is only an easy way out to create an image of trying to change the student, whereas there are better options available for fundamentally changing the behaviour of the student.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.