CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  In this question below is given a statement f... Start Learning for Free
In this question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true then decide which of the suggested courses of actions is worth pursuing.
Statement: 
A train recently derailed and fell into a river, spilling tons of wood chips. The cause of the derailment has been listed as a suspected broken rail on the track.
Courses of Action:  
I. Since there were no fatalities, the government should not bother looking into the matter.
II. A cleanup contractor should be immediately secured and asked to clean the wood chips at the earliest.
III. The cause of the broken rail on the track should be ascertained and prompt steps should be taken to prevent any such mis-happenings in the future.
  • a)
    I follow 
  • b)
    II follow 
  • c)
    III follow 
  • d)
    I and II follow 
  • e)
    None of the above
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
In this question below is given a statement followed by two courses of...
I doesn’t follow. The government cannot ignore the matter just because there were no fatalities. II and III clearly follow. However, in the absence of any such option, the answer is (e).
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Question Description
In this question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true then decide which of the suggested courses of actions is worth pursuing.Statement:A train recently derailed and fell into a river, spilling tons of wood chips. The cause of the derailment has been listed as a suspected broken rail on the track.Courses of Action: I. Since there were no fatalities, the government should not bother looking into the matter.II. A cleanup contractor should be immediately secured and asked to clean the wood chips at the earliest.III. The cause of the broken rail on the track should be ascertained and prompt steps should be taken to prevent any such mis-happenings in the future.a)I followb)II followc)III followd)I and II followe)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about In this question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true then decide which of the suggested courses of actions is worth pursuing.Statement:A train recently derailed and fell into a river, spilling tons of wood chips. The cause of the derailment has been listed as a suspected broken rail on the track.Courses of Action: I. Since there were no fatalities, the government should not bother looking into the matter.II. A cleanup contractor should be immediately secured and asked to clean the wood chips at the earliest.III. The cause of the broken rail on the track should be ascertained and prompt steps should be taken to prevent any such mis-happenings in the future.a)I followb)II followc)III followd)I and II followe)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In this question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true then decide which of the suggested courses of actions is worth pursuing.Statement:A train recently derailed and fell into a river, spilling tons of wood chips. The cause of the derailment has been listed as a suspected broken rail on the track.Courses of Action: I. Since there were no fatalities, the government should not bother looking into the matter.II. A cleanup contractor should be immediately secured and asked to clean the wood chips at the earliest.III. The cause of the broken rail on the track should be ascertained and prompt steps should be taken to prevent any such mis-happenings in the future.a)I followb)II followc)III followd)I and II followe)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In this question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true then decide which of the suggested courses of actions is worth pursuing.Statement:A train recently derailed and fell into a river, spilling tons of wood chips. The cause of the derailment has been listed as a suspected broken rail on the track.Courses of Action: I. Since there were no fatalities, the government should not bother looking into the matter.II. A cleanup contractor should be immediately secured and asked to clean the wood chips at the earliest.III. The cause of the broken rail on the track should be ascertained and prompt steps should be taken to prevent any such mis-happenings in the future.a)I followb)II followc)III followd)I and II followe)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In this question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true then decide which of the suggested courses of actions is worth pursuing.Statement:A train recently derailed and fell into a river, spilling tons of wood chips. The cause of the derailment has been listed as a suspected broken rail on the track.Courses of Action: I. Since there were no fatalities, the government should not bother looking into the matter.II. A cleanup contractor should be immediately secured and asked to clean the wood chips at the earliest.III. The cause of the broken rail on the track should be ascertained and prompt steps should be taken to prevent any such mis-happenings in the future.a)I followb)II followc)III followd)I and II followe)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In this question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true then decide which of the suggested courses of actions is worth pursuing.Statement:A train recently derailed and fell into a river, spilling tons of wood chips. The cause of the derailment has been listed as a suspected broken rail on the track.Courses of Action: I. Since there were no fatalities, the government should not bother looking into the matter.II. A cleanup contractor should be immediately secured and asked to clean the wood chips at the earliest.III. The cause of the broken rail on the track should be ascertained and prompt steps should be taken to prevent any such mis-happenings in the future.a)I followb)II followc)III followd)I and II followe)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In this question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true then decide which of the suggested courses of actions is worth pursuing.Statement:A train recently derailed and fell into a river, spilling tons of wood chips. The cause of the derailment has been listed as a suspected broken rail on the track.Courses of Action: I. Since there were no fatalities, the government should not bother looking into the matter.II. A cleanup contractor should be immediately secured and asked to clean the wood chips at the earliest.III. The cause of the broken rail on the track should be ascertained and prompt steps should be taken to prevent any such mis-happenings in the future.a)I followb)II followc)III followd)I and II followe)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In this question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true then decide which of the suggested courses of actions is worth pursuing.Statement:A train recently derailed and fell into a river, spilling tons of wood chips. The cause of the derailment has been listed as a suspected broken rail on the track.Courses of Action: I. Since there were no fatalities, the government should not bother looking into the matter.II. A cleanup contractor should be immediately secured and asked to clean the wood chips at the earliest.III. The cause of the broken rail on the track should be ascertained and prompt steps should be taken to prevent any such mis-happenings in the future.a)I followb)II followc)III followd)I and II followe)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In this question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true then decide which of the suggested courses of actions is worth pursuing.Statement:A train recently derailed and fell into a river, spilling tons of wood chips. The cause of the derailment has been listed as a suspected broken rail on the track.Courses of Action: I. Since there were no fatalities, the government should not bother looking into the matter.II. A cleanup contractor should be immediately secured and asked to clean the wood chips at the earliest.III. The cause of the broken rail on the track should be ascertained and prompt steps should be taken to prevent any such mis-happenings in the future.a)I followb)II followc)III followd)I and II followe)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
Signup to solve all Doubts
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev