Consider the following statements.1. Article 358 enables the State to ...
Article 358 enables the State to make any law or take any executive action inconsistent with Fundamental Rights under Article 19 while Article 359 enables the State to make any law or take any executive action inconsistent with those Fundamental Rights whose enforcement is suspended by the Presidential Order.Explanation:
Article 358:
- Article 358 enables the State to make any law or take any executive action inconsistent with Fundamental Rights under Article 19.
- This means that during a Proclamation of Emergency, the State can make any law or take any executive action that is inconsistent with the rights guaranteed under Article 19, which includes the right to freedom of speech and expression, the right to assemble peacefully, etc.
Article 359:
- Article 359 enables the State to make any law or take any executive action inconsistent with those Fundamental Rights whose enforcement is suspended by the Presidential Order.
- This means that during a Proclamation of Emergency, the State can make any law or take any executive action that is inconsistent with the Fundamental Rights whose enforcement has been suspended by the Presidential Order.
- This is a broader provision compared to Article 358, as it allows the State to act against a wider range of Fundamental Rights.
Conclusion:
- Both statements are correct in their explanation of Article 358 and Article 359, respectively.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all UPSC courses
Consider the following statements.1. Article 358 enables the State to ...
Explanation:
Article 358 and Article 359 of the Indian Constitution both deal with the suspension of Fundamental Rights during an emergency. However, there are some differences between the two articles.
Article 358: Effect of Proclamation of Emergency
- Article 358 enables the State to make any law or take any executive action inconsistent with Fundamental Rights under Article 19.
- This article comes into force when a Proclamation of Emergency is issued on the grounds of a threat to the security of India or a part thereof.
- During the period of Emergency, the State can suspend the right to freedom of speech and expression, the right to assemble peacefully and without arms, and the right to form associations or unions.
- However, the State cannot suspend the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21, except in accordance with the procedure established by law.
Article 359: Suspension of the enforcement of Fundamental Rights
- Article 359 enables the President to suspend the enforcement of Fundamental Rights during an Emergency.
- This article comes into force when a Proclamation of Emergency is issued on the grounds of war or external aggression or armed rebellion.
- During the period of Emergency, the State can suspend the enforcement of any Fundamental Right except Article 20 and Article 21.
- However, the suspension of these Fundamental Rights can only be done by a Presidential Order, and the Order must specify which rights are being suspended and the duration of the suspension.
Conclusion:
From the above explanation, it is clear that both statements are correct. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D'.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.