Question Description
Just as one must learn the art of killing in the training for violence, so one must learn the art of dying in the training for non-violence. Violence does not mean emancipation from fear, but discovering the means of combating the cause of fear. Non-violence, on the other hand, has no cause for fear. The votary of non-violence has to cultivate the capacity for sacrifice of the highest type in order to be free from fear. He recks not if he should lose his hand, his wealth, his life. He who has not overcome all fear cannot practice ahimsa to perfection. The votary of ahimsa has only one fear that is of god. He who seeks refuge in god ought to have a glimpse of the atma that transcends the body; and the moment one has a glimpse of the imperishable Atma one sheds the love of the perishable body. Training in violence is thus diametrically opposed to training in violence. Violence is needed for the protection of things external; non-violence is needed for the protection of Atma, for the protection of one’s honour.Why does the author suggest that practitioners of non-violence should develop capacity for sacrifice?a)As practitioner of non-violence remains defenceless, sacrifice is the only available remedy.b)Practitioner of non-violence, by sacrificing strikes at the root cause of violence, which is self.c)Sacrifice imparts the practitioner of non violence a moral force.d)Sacrifice is essential for practitioner of non violence to overcome and be free from fear.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Just as one must learn the art of killing in the training for violence, so one must learn the art of dying in the training for non-violence. Violence does not mean emancipation from fear, but discovering the means of combating the cause of fear. Non-violence, on the other hand, has no cause for fear. The votary of non-violence has to cultivate the capacity for sacrifice of the highest type in order to be free from fear. He recks not if he should lose his hand, his wealth, his life. He who has not overcome all fear cannot practice ahimsa to perfection. The votary of ahimsa has only one fear that is of god. He who seeks refuge in god ought to have a glimpse of the atma that transcends the body; and the moment one has a glimpse of the imperishable Atma one sheds the love of the perishable body. Training in violence is thus diametrically opposed to training in violence. Violence is needed for the protection of things external; non-violence is needed for the protection of Atma, for the protection of one’s honour.Why does the author suggest that practitioners of non-violence should develop capacity for sacrifice?a)As practitioner of non-violence remains defenceless, sacrifice is the only available remedy.b)Practitioner of non-violence, by sacrificing strikes at the root cause of violence, which is self.c)Sacrifice imparts the practitioner of non violence a moral force.d)Sacrifice is essential for practitioner of non violence to overcome and be free from fear.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Just as one must learn the art of killing in the training for violence, so one must learn the art of dying in the training for non-violence. Violence does not mean emancipation from fear, but discovering the means of combating the cause of fear. Non-violence, on the other hand, has no cause for fear. The votary of non-violence has to cultivate the capacity for sacrifice of the highest type in order to be free from fear. He recks not if he should lose his hand, his wealth, his life. He who has not overcome all fear cannot practice ahimsa to perfection. The votary of ahimsa has only one fear that is of god. He who seeks refuge in god ought to have a glimpse of the atma that transcends the body; and the moment one has a glimpse of the imperishable Atma one sheds the love of the perishable body. Training in violence is thus diametrically opposed to training in violence. Violence is needed for the protection of things external; non-violence is needed for the protection of Atma, for the protection of one’s honour.Why does the author suggest that practitioners of non-violence should develop capacity for sacrifice?a)As practitioner of non-violence remains defenceless, sacrifice is the only available remedy.b)Practitioner of non-violence, by sacrificing strikes at the root cause of violence, which is self.c)Sacrifice imparts the practitioner of non violence a moral force.d)Sacrifice is essential for practitioner of non violence to overcome and be free from fear.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Just as one must learn the art of killing in the training for violence, so one must learn the art of dying in the training for non-violence. Violence does not mean emancipation from fear, but discovering the means of combating the cause of fear. Non-violence, on the other hand, has no cause for fear. The votary of non-violence has to cultivate the capacity for sacrifice of the highest type in order to be free from fear. He recks not if he should lose his hand, his wealth, his life. He who has not overcome all fear cannot practice ahimsa to perfection. The votary of ahimsa has only one fear that is of god. He who seeks refuge in god ought to have a glimpse of the atma that transcends the body; and the moment one has a glimpse of the imperishable Atma one sheds the love of the perishable body. Training in violence is thus diametrically opposed to training in violence. Violence is needed for the protection of things external; non-violence is needed for the protection of Atma, for the protection of one’s honour.Why does the author suggest that practitioners of non-violence should develop capacity for sacrifice?a)As practitioner of non-violence remains defenceless, sacrifice is the only available remedy.b)Practitioner of non-violence, by sacrificing strikes at the root cause of violence, which is self.c)Sacrifice imparts the practitioner of non violence a moral force.d)Sacrifice is essential for practitioner of non violence to overcome and be free from fear.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Just as one must learn the art of killing in the training for violence, so one must learn the art of dying in the training for non-violence. Violence does not mean emancipation from fear, but discovering the means of combating the cause of fear. Non-violence, on the other hand, has no cause for fear. The votary of non-violence has to cultivate the capacity for sacrifice of the highest type in order to be free from fear. He recks not if he should lose his hand, his wealth, his life. He who has not overcome all fear cannot practice ahimsa to perfection. The votary of ahimsa has only one fear that is of god. He who seeks refuge in god ought to have a glimpse of the atma that transcends the body; and the moment one has a glimpse of the imperishable Atma one sheds the love of the perishable body. Training in violence is thus diametrically opposed to training in violence. Violence is needed for the protection of things external; non-violence is needed for the protection of Atma, for the protection of one’s honour.Why does the author suggest that practitioners of non-violence should develop capacity for sacrifice?a)As practitioner of non-violence remains defenceless, sacrifice is the only available remedy.b)Practitioner of non-violence, by sacrificing strikes at the root cause of violence, which is self.c)Sacrifice imparts the practitioner of non violence a moral force.d)Sacrifice is essential for practitioner of non violence to overcome and be free from fear.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Just as one must learn the art of killing in the training for violence, so one must learn the art of dying in the training for non-violence. Violence does not mean emancipation from fear, but discovering the means of combating the cause of fear. Non-violence, on the other hand, has no cause for fear. The votary of non-violence has to cultivate the capacity for sacrifice of the highest type in order to be free from fear. He recks not if he should lose his hand, his wealth, his life. He who has not overcome all fear cannot practice ahimsa to perfection. The votary of ahimsa has only one fear that is of god. He who seeks refuge in god ought to have a glimpse of the atma that transcends the body; and the moment one has a glimpse of the imperishable Atma one sheds the love of the perishable body. Training in violence is thus diametrically opposed to training in violence. Violence is needed for the protection of things external; non-violence is needed for the protection of Atma, for the protection of one’s honour.Why does the author suggest that practitioners of non-violence should develop capacity for sacrifice?a)As practitioner of non-violence remains defenceless, sacrifice is the only available remedy.b)Practitioner of non-violence, by sacrificing strikes at the root cause of violence, which is self.c)Sacrifice imparts the practitioner of non violence a moral force.d)Sacrifice is essential for practitioner of non violence to overcome and be free from fear.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Just as one must learn the art of killing in the training for violence, so one must learn the art of dying in the training for non-violence. Violence does not mean emancipation from fear, but discovering the means of combating the cause of fear. Non-violence, on the other hand, has no cause for fear. The votary of non-violence has to cultivate the capacity for sacrifice of the highest type in order to be free from fear. He recks not if he should lose his hand, his wealth, his life. He who has not overcome all fear cannot practice ahimsa to perfection. The votary of ahimsa has only one fear that is of god. He who seeks refuge in god ought to have a glimpse of the atma that transcends the body; and the moment one has a glimpse of the imperishable Atma one sheds the love of the perishable body. Training in violence is thus diametrically opposed to training in violence. Violence is needed for the protection of things external; non-violence is needed for the protection of Atma, for the protection of one’s honour.Why does the author suggest that practitioners of non-violence should develop capacity for sacrifice?a)As practitioner of non-violence remains defenceless, sacrifice is the only available remedy.b)Practitioner of non-violence, by sacrificing strikes at the root cause of violence, which is self.c)Sacrifice imparts the practitioner of non violence a moral force.d)Sacrifice is essential for practitioner of non violence to overcome and be free from fear.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Just as one must learn the art of killing in the training for violence, so one must learn the art of dying in the training for non-violence. Violence does not mean emancipation from fear, but discovering the means of combating the cause of fear. Non-violence, on the other hand, has no cause for fear. The votary of non-violence has to cultivate the capacity for sacrifice of the highest type in order to be free from fear. He recks not if he should lose his hand, his wealth, his life. He who has not overcome all fear cannot practice ahimsa to perfection. The votary of ahimsa has only one fear that is of god. He who seeks refuge in god ought to have a glimpse of the atma that transcends the body; and the moment one has a glimpse of the imperishable Atma one sheds the love of the perishable body. Training in violence is thus diametrically opposed to training in violence. Violence is needed for the protection of things external; non-violence is needed for the protection of Atma, for the protection of one’s honour.Why does the author suggest that practitioners of non-violence should develop capacity for sacrifice?a)As practitioner of non-violence remains defenceless, sacrifice is the only available remedy.b)Practitioner of non-violence, by sacrificing strikes at the root cause of violence, which is self.c)Sacrifice imparts the practitioner of non violence a moral force.d)Sacrifice is essential for practitioner of non violence to overcome and be free from fear.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Just as one must learn the art of killing in the training for violence, so one must learn the art of dying in the training for non-violence. Violence does not mean emancipation from fear, but discovering the means of combating the cause of fear. Non-violence, on the other hand, has no cause for fear. The votary of non-violence has to cultivate the capacity for sacrifice of the highest type in order to be free from fear. He recks not if he should lose his hand, his wealth, his life. He who has not overcome all fear cannot practice ahimsa to perfection. The votary of ahimsa has only one fear that is of god. He who seeks refuge in god ought to have a glimpse of the atma that transcends the body; and the moment one has a glimpse of the imperishable Atma one sheds the love of the perishable body. Training in violence is thus diametrically opposed to training in violence. Violence is needed for the protection of things external; non-violence is needed for the protection of Atma, for the protection of one’s honour.Why does the author suggest that practitioners of non-violence should develop capacity for sacrifice?a)As practitioner of non-violence remains defenceless, sacrifice is the only available remedy.b)Practitioner of non-violence, by sacrificing strikes at the root cause of violence, which is self.c)Sacrifice imparts the practitioner of non violence a moral force.d)Sacrifice is essential for practitioner of non violence to overcome and be free from fear.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.