Humanities/Arts Exam  >  Humanities/Arts Questions  >  Who decides the substance and timing of the b... Start Learning for Free
Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?
  • a)
    Governor
  • b)
    President
  • c)
    Cabinet
  • d)
    None
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?a)Governorb)President...
The cabinet decides the substance and even the timing of the bill. No major bill is introduced in the parliament without the cabinet’s approval.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?a)Governorb)President...
The correct answer is option 'C' - Cabinet.

Explanation:
-------------------

The substance and timing of a bill are determined by the Cabinet. The Cabinet is a group of high-ranking government officials, usually appointed by the President or Prime Minister, who are responsible for making important policy decisions and advising the head of government.

1. Role of the Cabinet:
The Cabinet plays a crucial role in the legislative process by formulating and proposing bills to be presented to the legislative body for consideration. They are responsible for the drafting and development of bills, including the determination of the content, scope, and objectives of the proposed legislation.

2. Substance of the Bill:
The Cabinet members, who are experts in their respective fields, analyze the issues and needs of society and then propose bills that address these concerns. They discuss and debate the various aspects of the bill, ensuring that it aligns with the government's policy objectives and priorities. The Cabinet's collective expertise and knowledge help shape the substance of the bill, ensuring that it is comprehensive, effective, and reflects the government's agenda.

3. Timing of the Bill:
The Cabinet also determines the timing of when a bill should be introduced to the legislative body. They consider various factors such as the urgency of the issue, political climate, public opinion, and the government's agenda. The timing of the bill is crucial as it can affect its chances of success in the legislative process. The Cabinet's decision on the timing ensures that the bill is introduced at an opportune moment to maximize its chances of receiving support and passing into law.

4. Consultation and Approval:
Before finalizing the substance and timing of a bill, the Cabinet engages in extensive consultations with relevant stakeholders, including experts, interest groups, and other government departments. This allows them to gather diverse perspectives and consider the potential impact and implications of the proposed legislation. Once the bill is finalized, it is presented to the legislative body for approval and further debate.

In conclusion, the Cabinet, comprising high-ranking government officials, holds the authority to decide the substance and timing of a bill. They utilize their expertise, consult relevant stakeholders, and consider various factors to ensure that the proposed legislation aligns with the government's policy objectives and is introduced at an opportune moment.
Free Test
Community Answer
Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?a)Governorb)President...
C) Cabinet
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follows:The steps for creating a new state are as follows: A bill on a new state has to be recommended by the President. In India, it is usually the Cabinet which requests the President to do that. Article 3 makes it clear that the Parliament is the sole authority on making a decision on a new state. President refers the bill to the State Assembly for its views giving it a certain period of time. Parliament is not obligated to follow on the views of State Assembly. If the State Assembly does not express its opinion within the specified period of time, the bill could be introduced in the Parliament after the expiry of the specified period. Why did the authors of the constitution put complete responsibility of creating new states ONLY with the Parliament? Why did they not provide a bigger role for a State Assembly other than expressing ‘its views’ on the topic? To understand the intentions behind a certain clause in our Constitution the legal experts refer to the discussions of the authors that preceded the formulation of these clauses referred to as Constituent Assembly Debates (CAD). One legal expert clarifies: When the Constituent Assembly was deliberating in November 1948 on the scope and content of Article 3, there was a proposal by Prof. KT Shah that the legislation constituting a new State from any region of a State should originate from the legislature of the State concerned. Had this procedure been approved, the power to decide the statehood of a region seeking separation would have been vested with the State legislature dominated by the elite of developed regions. Opposing the same and using the then demand for an Andhra Province as an example, Shri K. Santhanam stated as under: “I wonder whether Professor Shah fully realizes the implications of his amendment. If his amendment is adopted, it would mean that no minority in any State can ask for separation of territory… unless it can get a majority in that State legislature. Take the case of Madras Province for instance. The Andhra’s want separation. They bring up a resolution in the Madras Legislature. It is defeated by a majority. There ends the matter. The way of the Andhra’s is blocked altogether. They cannot take any further step to constitute an Andhra province.” Thus Article 3 emerged in its current form.Q. In India, who presents the bill for the formation of the new state to the President?

Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follows:The steps for creating a new state are as follows: A bill on a new state has to be recommended by the President. In India, it is usually the Cabinet which requests the President to do that. Article 3 makes it clear that the Parliament is the sole authority on making a decision on a new state. President refers the bill to the State Assembly for its views giving it a certain period of time. Parliament is not obligated to follow on the views of State Assembly. If the State Assembly does not express its opinion within the specified period of time, the bill could be introduced in the Parliament after the expiry of the specified period. Why did the authors of the constitution put complete responsibility of creating new states ONLY with the Parliament? Why did they not provide a bigger role for a State Assembly other than expressing ‘its views’ on the topic? To understand the intentions behind a certain clause in our Constitution the legal experts refer to the discussions of the authors that preceded the formulation of these clauses referred to as Constituent Assembly Debates (CAD). One legal expert clarifies: When the Constituent Assembly was deliberating in November 1948 on the scope and content of Article 3, there was a proposal by Prof. KT Shah that the legislation constituting a new State from any region of a State should originate from the legislature of the State concerned. Had this procedure been approved, the power to decide the statehood of a region seeking separation would have been vested with the State legislature dominated by the elite of developed regions. Opposing the same and using the then demand for an Andhra Province as an example, Shri K. Santhanam stated as under: “I wonder whether Professor Shah fully realizes the implications of his amendment. If his amendment is adopted, it would mean that no minority in any State can ask for separation of territory… unless it can get a majority in that State legislature. Take the case of Madras Province for instance. The Andhra’s want separation. They bring up a resolution in the Madras Legislature. It is defeated by a majority. There ends the matter. The way of the Andhra’s is blocked altogether. They cannot take any further step to constitute an Andhra province.” Thus Article 3 emerged in its current form.Q. To whom does the President refer the bill after his review?

Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follows:The steps for creating a new state are as follows: A bill on a new state has to be recommended by the President. In India, it is usually the Cabinet which requests the President to do that. Article 3 makes it clear that the Parliament is the sole authority on making a decision on a new state. President refers the bill to the State Assembly for its views giving it a certain period of time. Parliament is not obligated to follow on the views of State Assembly. If the State Assembly does not express its opinion within the specified period of time, the bill could be introduced in the Parliament after the expiry of the specified period. Why did the authors of the constitution put complete responsibility of creating new states ONLY with the Parliament? Why did they not provide a bigger role for a State Assembly other than expressing ‘its views’ on the topic? To understand the intentions behind a certain clause in our Constitution the legal experts refer to the discussions of the authors that preceded the formulation of these clauses referred to as Constituent Assembly Debates (CAD). One legal expert clarifies: When the Constituent Assembly was deliberating in November 1948 on the scope and content of Article 3, there was a proposal by Prof. KT Shah that the legislation constituting a new State from any region of a State should originate from the legislature of the State concerned. Had this procedure been approved, the power to decide the statehood of a region seeking separation would have been vested with the State legislature dominated by the elite of developed regions. Opposing the same and using the then demand for an Andhra Province as an example, Shri K. Santhanam stated as under: “I wonder whether Professor Shah fully realizes the implications of his amendment. If his amendment is adopted, it would mean that no minority in any State can ask for separation of territory… unless it can get a majority in that State legislature. Take the case of Madras Province for instance. The Andhra’s want separation. They bring up a resolution in the Madras Legislature. It is defeated by a majority. There ends the matter. The way of the Andhra’s is blocked altogether. They cannot take any further step to constitute an Andhra province.” Thus Article 3 emerged in its current form.Q. Where did the Andhra’s get resolution from?

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?a)Governorb)Presidentc)Cabinetd)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?a)Governorb)Presidentc)Cabinetd)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2025 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?a)Governorb)Presidentc)Cabinetd)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?a)Governorb)Presidentc)Cabinetd)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?a)Governorb)Presidentc)Cabinetd)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?a)Governorb)Presidentc)Cabinetd)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?a)Governorb)Presidentc)Cabinetd)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?a)Governorb)Presidentc)Cabinetd)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?a)Governorb)Presidentc)Cabinetd)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Who decides the substance and timing of the bill?a)Governorb)Presidentc)Cabinetd)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev