All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Which one of the following officials is appo... Start Learning for Free
Which one of the following officials is appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister?
  • a)
    The Chief Justice of India
  • b)
    Chairman of UPSC
  • c)
    Governor of State
  • d)
    All of these
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Which one of the following officials is appointed by the President on...

Chief Justice of India:
- The Chief Justice of India is appointed by the President of India.
- The appointment is done based on the recommendation of the Chief Justice of India and other senior judges of the Supreme Court.

Chairman of UPSC:
- The Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) is appointed by the President of India.
- The appointment is made on the advice of the Prime Minister.

Governor of State:
- The Governor of a State is also appointed by the President of India.
- The appointment is generally made on the advice of the Prime Minister.

All of these:
- In the case of the Chief Justice of India, Chairman of UPSC, and Governor of State, the President appoints these officials on the advice of the Prime Minister.
- This is to ensure that the appointments are made in line with the recommendations and decisions of the government.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D' - All of these officials are appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Which one of the following officials is appointed by the President on...
Article 74 Council of Ministers to aid and advise President states that :-(1) There shall be a Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister at the head to aid and advise the President who shall, in the exercise of his functions, act in accordance with such advice: Provided that the President may require the council of Ministers to reconsider such advice, either generally or otherwise, and the President shall act in accordance with the advice tendered after such reconsideration Hence, option D is correct.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal informed the Lok Sabha that of the 604 judges appointed since 2018 to various High Courts, 454 belong to general category. Mr. Meghwal’s written answer was in response to a question by Lok Sabha member and All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) leader, Asaduddin Owaisi, who asked if “79% of the High Court judges appointed since 2018 belonged to upper castes”.The Minister also informed the member that judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts are appointed under Articles 124, 217 and 224 of the Constitution of India, that do not provide for reservation for any caste or class. However, he said, the government has been requesting the Chief Justices of High Courts to ensure social diversity by considering suitable candidates from Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), minorities and women.Mr. Meghwal gave a break-up of the social background of the judges on the basis of an annexure that they are supposed to fill at the time of the recommendation. “As per information provided by the recommendees, out of 604 High Court Judges appointed since 2018 till 17.07.2023, 458 Judges belong to the General Category….,” the Minister replied. Though Mr. Meghwal didn’t give a percentage, it works out to over 75 % of the appointees. The Minister noted that 18 judges belong to the SC category, nine are from the ST category, 72 from the OBC category, 34 from the Minority category and for the remaining 13 judges, there is no information available in the annexures filled by them.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: "Centre seeks more social diversity in judges appointment", The Hindu]Q.Who among the following has the authority to appoint a Supreme Court justice to serve as Indias acting Chief Justice?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed summoned his secretary, K. Balachandran, at around 11:15 p.m. on 25 June 1975. Ten minutes later, Balachandran met the pyjama-clad president in the private sitting room of his official residence at Rashtrapati Bhavan. The president handed his secretary a one-page letter from Indira Gandhi marked 'Top Secret'. Referring to the prime minister's discussion with the president earlier that day, the letter said she was in receipt of information that internal disturbances posed an imminent threat to India's internal security. It requested a proclamation of Emergency under Article 352 (1) if the president was satisfied on this score. She would have preferred to have first consulted the cabinet, but there was no time to lose. Therefore, she was invoking a departure from the Transaction of Business Rules in exercise of her powers under Rule 12 thereof. The president asked for his aide's opinion on the letter, which did not have the proposed proclamation attached. Balachandran said that such a proclamation was constitutionally impermissible on more than one ground. At this, the president said that he wanted to consult the Indian Constitution. Balachandran retreated to his office to locate a copy. Meanwhile, the deputy secretary in the president's secretariat showed up. The two officials launched into a discussion about the constitutionality of the prime minister's proposal before they returned to President Ahmed with a copy of the Constitution. Balachandran explained that the president's personal satisfaction that internal disturbances posed a threat to internal security was constitutionally irrelevant. What the Constitution required was the advice of the council of ministers. Balachandran withdrew when the president said he wanted to speak to the prime minister. When he re-entered the room 10 minutes later, President Ahmed informed him that R. K. Dhawan had come over with a draft Emergency proclamation, which he had signed. Then the president swallowed a tranquilizer and went to bed.This late-night concern for constitutional propriety is revealing. What we see unfolding in the hunt for a copy of the Constitution, the leafing through of its pages to make sure that the draft proclamation met the letter of the law, is the meticulous process of the paradoxical suspension of the law by law. The substance of the discussion concerns the legality of the procedures to follow in issuing the Emergency proclamation. The political will behind the act goes unmentioned. This is because Article 352 (1) of the Constitution itself had left the judgement of the necessity for the Emergency proclamation outside the law. The doctrine of necessity regards the judgement of crisis conditions as something that the law itself cannot handle; it is a lacuna in the juridical order that the executive is obligated to remedy.Q. Why does the author state that the late-night concern for constitutional propriety is revealing?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed summoned his secretary, K. Balachandran, at around 11:15 p.m. on 25 June 1975. Ten minutes later, Balachandran met the pyjama-clad president in the private sitting room of his official residence at Rashtrapati Bhavan. The president handed his secretary a one-page letter from Indira Gandhi marked 'Top Secret'. Referring to the prime minister's discussion with the president earlier that day, the letter said she was in receipt of information that internal disturbances posed an imminent threat to India's internal security. It requested a proclamation of Emergency under Article 352 (1) if the president was satisfied on this score. She would have preferred to have first consulted the cabinet, but there was no time to lose. Therefore, she was invoking a departure from the Transaction of Business Rules in exercise of her powers under Rule 12 thereof. The president asked for his aide's opinion on the letter, which did not have the proposed proclamation attached. Balachandran said that such a proclamation was constitutionally impermissible on more than one ground. At this, the president said that he wanted to consult the Indian Constitution. Balachandran retreated to his office to locate a copy. Meanwhile, the deputy secretary in the president's secretariat showed up. The two officials launched into a discussion about the constitutionality of the prime minister's proposal before they returned to President Ahmed with a copy of the Constitution. Balachandran explained that the president's personal satisfaction that internal disturbances posed a threat to internal security was constitutionally irrelevant. What the Constitution required was the advice of the council of ministers. Balachandran withdrew when the president said he wanted to speak to the prime minister. When he re-entered the room 10 minutes later, President Ahmed informed him that R. K. Dhawan had come over with a draft Emergency proclamation, which he had signed. Then the president swallowed a tranquilizer and went to bed.This late-night concern for constitutional propriety is revealing. What we see unfolding in the hunt for a copy of the Constitution, the leafing through of its pages to make sure that the draft proclamation met the letter of the law, is the meticulous process of the paradoxical suspension of the law by law. The substance of the discussion concerns the legality of the procedures to follow in issuing the Emergency proclamation. The political will behind the act goes unmentioned. This is because Article 352 (1) of the Constitution itself had left the judgement of the necessity for the Emergency proclamation outside the law. The doctrine of necessity regards the judgement of crisis conditions as something that the law itself cannot handle; it is a lacuna in the juridical order that the executive is obligated to remedy.Q. What can be inferred from the passage about the request for the Emergency proclamation?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Which one of the following officials is appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister?a)The Chief Justice of Indiab)Chairman of UPSCc)Governor of Stated)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which one of the following officials is appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister?a)The Chief Justice of Indiab)Chairman of UPSCc)Governor of Stated)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Which one of the following officials is appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister?a)The Chief Justice of Indiab)Chairman of UPSCc)Governor of Stated)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which one of the following officials is appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister?a)The Chief Justice of Indiab)Chairman of UPSCc)Governor of Stated)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which one of the following officials is appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister?a)The Chief Justice of Indiab)Chairman of UPSCc)Governor of Stated)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which one of the following officials is appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister?a)The Chief Justice of Indiab)Chairman of UPSCc)Governor of Stated)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which one of the following officials is appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister?a)The Chief Justice of Indiab)Chairman of UPSCc)Governor of Stated)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which one of the following officials is appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister?a)The Chief Justice of Indiab)Chairman of UPSCc)Governor of Stated)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which one of the following officials is appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister?a)The Chief Justice of Indiab)Chairman of UPSCc)Governor of Stated)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which one of the following officials is appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister?a)The Chief Justice of Indiab)Chairman of UPSCc)Governor of Stated)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup