Question Description
Apparently stung by widespread criticism, the [X] government on Monday shied away from enacting a controversial ordinance that sought to empower the police to prosecute persons who disseminated information that the law enforcement deemed defamatory.The Chief Minister said various quarters had aired scepticism about the recent revision to the [...] Police Act, 2011. Hence, the government had decided not to put into effect the ordinance signed into law by [X] Governor Arif Muhammad Khan last week.Alternatively, the government would seek a consensus view by placing the amendment for debate in the Legislative Assembly, he said. The significant turnabout in policy came approximately an hour after CM conferred with the members of the CPI(M) State secretariat and the Left Democratic Front (LDF). The LDF and the government had come under withering criticism from Opposition parties, journalist organisations and civil rights activists for promulgating a “black law” that threatened free speech and the freedom of the press.Q. What is not true about ordinance?a)Section 118A is being considered as the most stringent of all clauses.b)The offence, however, is bailable and cognizable.c)The section proposes three years of imprisonment and a fine of up to Rs 10,000 for those found guilty of producing, publishing or disseminating abusive, derogatory and defamatory content online.d)Ordinance will be in force for next one year in the state 'x'.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Apparently stung by widespread criticism, the [X] government on Monday shied away from enacting a controversial ordinance that sought to empower the police to prosecute persons who disseminated information that the law enforcement deemed defamatory.The Chief Minister said various quarters had aired scepticism about the recent revision to the [...] Police Act, 2011. Hence, the government had decided not to put into effect the ordinance signed into law by [X] Governor Arif Muhammad Khan last week.Alternatively, the government would seek a consensus view by placing the amendment for debate in the Legislative Assembly, he said. The significant turnabout in policy came approximately an hour after CM conferred with the members of the CPI(M) State secretariat and the Left Democratic Front (LDF). The LDF and the government had come under withering criticism from Opposition parties, journalist organisations and civil rights activists for promulgating a “black law” that threatened free speech and the freedom of the press.Q. What is not true about ordinance?a)Section 118A is being considered as the most stringent of all clauses.b)The offence, however, is bailable and cognizable.c)The section proposes three years of imprisonment and a fine of up to Rs 10,000 for those found guilty of producing, publishing or disseminating abusive, derogatory and defamatory content online.d)Ordinance will be in force for next one year in the state 'x'.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Apparently stung by widespread criticism, the [X] government on Monday shied away from enacting a controversial ordinance that sought to empower the police to prosecute persons who disseminated information that the law enforcement deemed defamatory.The Chief Minister said various quarters had aired scepticism about the recent revision to the [...] Police Act, 2011. Hence, the government had decided not to put into effect the ordinance signed into law by [X] Governor Arif Muhammad Khan last week.Alternatively, the government would seek a consensus view by placing the amendment for debate in the Legislative Assembly, he said. The significant turnabout in policy came approximately an hour after CM conferred with the members of the CPI(M) State secretariat and the Left Democratic Front (LDF). The LDF and the government had come under withering criticism from Opposition parties, journalist organisations and civil rights activists for promulgating a “black law” that threatened free speech and the freedom of the press.Q. What is not true about ordinance?a)Section 118A is being considered as the most stringent of all clauses.b)The offence, however, is bailable and cognizable.c)The section proposes three years of imprisonment and a fine of up to Rs 10,000 for those found guilty of producing, publishing or disseminating abusive, derogatory and defamatory content online.d)Ordinance will be in force for next one year in the state 'x'.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Apparently stung by widespread criticism, the [X] government on Monday shied away from enacting a controversial ordinance that sought to empower the police to prosecute persons who disseminated information that the law enforcement deemed defamatory.The Chief Minister said various quarters had aired scepticism about the recent revision to the [...] Police Act, 2011. Hence, the government had decided not to put into effect the ordinance signed into law by [X] Governor Arif Muhammad Khan last week.Alternatively, the government would seek a consensus view by placing the amendment for debate in the Legislative Assembly, he said. The significant turnabout in policy came approximately an hour after CM conferred with the members of the CPI(M) State secretariat and the Left Democratic Front (LDF). The LDF and the government had come under withering criticism from Opposition parties, journalist organisations and civil rights activists for promulgating a “black law” that threatened free speech and the freedom of the press.Q. What is not true about ordinance?a)Section 118A is being considered as the most stringent of all clauses.b)The offence, however, is bailable and cognizable.c)The section proposes three years of imprisonment and a fine of up to Rs 10,000 for those found guilty of producing, publishing or disseminating abusive, derogatory and defamatory content online.d)Ordinance will be in force for next one year in the state 'x'.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Apparently stung by widespread criticism, the [X] government on Monday shied away from enacting a controversial ordinance that sought to empower the police to prosecute persons who disseminated information that the law enforcement deemed defamatory.The Chief Minister said various quarters had aired scepticism about the recent revision to the [...] Police Act, 2011. Hence, the government had decided not to put into effect the ordinance signed into law by [X] Governor Arif Muhammad Khan last week.Alternatively, the government would seek a consensus view by placing the amendment for debate in the Legislative Assembly, he said. The significant turnabout in policy came approximately an hour after CM conferred with the members of the CPI(M) State secretariat and the Left Democratic Front (LDF). The LDF and the government had come under withering criticism from Opposition parties, journalist organisations and civil rights activists for promulgating a “black law” that threatened free speech and the freedom of the press.Q. What is not true about ordinance?a)Section 118A is being considered as the most stringent of all clauses.b)The offence, however, is bailable and cognizable.c)The section proposes three years of imprisonment and a fine of up to Rs 10,000 for those found guilty of producing, publishing or disseminating abusive, derogatory and defamatory content online.d)Ordinance will be in force for next one year in the state 'x'.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Apparently stung by widespread criticism, the [X] government on Monday shied away from enacting a controversial ordinance that sought to empower the police to prosecute persons who disseminated information that the law enforcement deemed defamatory.The Chief Minister said various quarters had aired scepticism about the recent revision to the [...] Police Act, 2011. Hence, the government had decided not to put into effect the ordinance signed into law by [X] Governor Arif Muhammad Khan last week.Alternatively, the government would seek a consensus view by placing the amendment for debate in the Legislative Assembly, he said. The significant turnabout in policy came approximately an hour after CM conferred with the members of the CPI(M) State secretariat and the Left Democratic Front (LDF). The LDF and the government had come under withering criticism from Opposition parties, journalist organisations and civil rights activists for promulgating a “black law” that threatened free speech and the freedom of the press.Q. What is not true about ordinance?a)Section 118A is being considered as the most stringent of all clauses.b)The offence, however, is bailable and cognizable.c)The section proposes three years of imprisonment and a fine of up to Rs 10,000 for those found guilty of producing, publishing or disseminating abusive, derogatory and defamatory content online.d)Ordinance will be in force for next one year in the state 'x'.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Apparently stung by widespread criticism, the [X] government on Monday shied away from enacting a controversial ordinance that sought to empower the police to prosecute persons who disseminated information that the law enforcement deemed defamatory.The Chief Minister said various quarters had aired scepticism about the recent revision to the [...] Police Act, 2011. Hence, the government had decided not to put into effect the ordinance signed into law by [X] Governor Arif Muhammad Khan last week.Alternatively, the government would seek a consensus view by placing the amendment for debate in the Legislative Assembly, he said. The significant turnabout in policy came approximately an hour after CM conferred with the members of the CPI(M) State secretariat and the Left Democratic Front (LDF). The LDF and the government had come under withering criticism from Opposition parties, journalist organisations and civil rights activists for promulgating a “black law” that threatened free speech and the freedom of the press.Q. What is not true about ordinance?a)Section 118A is being considered as the most stringent of all clauses.b)The offence, however, is bailable and cognizable.c)The section proposes three years of imprisonment and a fine of up to Rs 10,000 for those found guilty of producing, publishing or disseminating abusive, derogatory and defamatory content online.d)Ordinance will be in force for next one year in the state 'x'.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Apparently stung by widespread criticism, the [X] government on Monday shied away from enacting a controversial ordinance that sought to empower the police to prosecute persons who disseminated information that the law enforcement deemed defamatory.The Chief Minister said various quarters had aired scepticism about the recent revision to the [...] Police Act, 2011. Hence, the government had decided not to put into effect the ordinance signed into law by [X] Governor Arif Muhammad Khan last week.Alternatively, the government would seek a consensus view by placing the amendment for debate in the Legislative Assembly, he said. The significant turnabout in policy came approximately an hour after CM conferred with the members of the CPI(M) State secretariat and the Left Democratic Front (LDF). The LDF and the government had come under withering criticism from Opposition parties, journalist organisations and civil rights activists for promulgating a “black law” that threatened free speech and the freedom of the press.Q. What is not true about ordinance?a)Section 118A is being considered as the most stringent of all clauses.b)The offence, however, is bailable and cognizable.c)The section proposes three years of imprisonment and a fine of up to Rs 10,000 for those found guilty of producing, publishing or disseminating abusive, derogatory and defamatory content online.d)Ordinance will be in force for next one year in the state 'x'.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Apparently stung by widespread criticism, the [X] government on Monday shied away from enacting a controversial ordinance that sought to empower the police to prosecute persons who disseminated information that the law enforcement deemed defamatory.The Chief Minister said various quarters had aired scepticism about the recent revision to the [...] Police Act, 2011. Hence, the government had decided not to put into effect the ordinance signed into law by [X] Governor Arif Muhammad Khan last week.Alternatively, the government would seek a consensus view by placing the amendment for debate in the Legislative Assembly, he said. The significant turnabout in policy came approximately an hour after CM conferred with the members of the CPI(M) State secretariat and the Left Democratic Front (LDF). The LDF and the government had come under withering criticism from Opposition parties, journalist organisations and civil rights activists for promulgating a “black law” that threatened free speech and the freedom of the press.Q. What is not true about ordinance?a)Section 118A is being considered as the most stringent of all clauses.b)The offence, however, is bailable and cognizable.c)The section proposes three years of imprisonment and a fine of up to Rs 10,000 for those found guilty of producing, publishing or disseminating abusive, derogatory and defamatory content online.d)Ordinance will be in force for next one year in the state 'x'.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.