Question Description
"Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. Which of the following, if true, weakens the author’s conclusion about “attitude toward inequality”?a)The countries with better income equality provide people with better education and awareness, making them capable of questioning the norms of Income inequality.b)Egalitarian or unequal, people are always least concerned about public affairs, aren’t they?c)The researchers only had data on top income shares from 24 countries, which means that it might not be possible to extrapolate the findings to other societies.d)They might be in a lower income level, but people from non-egalitarian countries know about their rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. Which of the following, if true, weakens the author’s conclusion about “attitude toward inequality”?a)The countries with better income equality provide people with better education and awareness, making them capable of questioning the norms of Income inequality.b)Egalitarian or unequal, people are always least concerned about public affairs, aren’t they?c)The researchers only had data on top income shares from 24 countries, which means that it might not be possible to extrapolate the findings to other societies.d)They might be in a lower income level, but people from non-egalitarian countries know about their rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. Which of the following, if true, weakens the author’s conclusion about “attitude toward inequality”?a)The countries with better income equality provide people with better education and awareness, making them capable of questioning the norms of Income inequality.b)Egalitarian or unequal, people are always least concerned about public affairs, aren’t they?c)The researchers only had data on top income shares from 24 countries, which means that it might not be possible to extrapolate the findings to other societies.d)They might be in a lower income level, but people from non-egalitarian countries know about their rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. Which of the following, if true, weakens the author’s conclusion about “attitude toward inequality”?a)The countries with better income equality provide people with better education and awareness, making them capable of questioning the norms of Income inequality.b)Egalitarian or unequal, people are always least concerned about public affairs, aren’t they?c)The researchers only had data on top income shares from 24 countries, which means that it might not be possible to extrapolate the findings to other societies.d)They might be in a lower income level, but people from non-egalitarian countries know about their rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. Which of the following, if true, weakens the author’s conclusion about “attitude toward inequality”?a)The countries with better income equality provide people with better education and awareness, making them capable of questioning the norms of Income inequality.b)Egalitarian or unequal, people are always least concerned about public affairs, aren’t they?c)The researchers only had data on top income shares from 24 countries, which means that it might not be possible to extrapolate the findings to other societies.d)They might be in a lower income level, but people from non-egalitarian countries know about their rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. Which of the following, if true, weakens the author’s conclusion about “attitude toward inequality”?a)The countries with better income equality provide people with better education and awareness, making them capable of questioning the norms of Income inequality.b)Egalitarian or unequal, people are always least concerned about public affairs, aren’t they?c)The researchers only had data on top income shares from 24 countries, which means that it might not be possible to extrapolate the findings to other societies.d)They might be in a lower income level, but people from non-egalitarian countries know about their rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. Which of the following, if true, weakens the author’s conclusion about “attitude toward inequality”?a)The countries with better income equality provide people with better education and awareness, making them capable of questioning the norms of Income inequality.b)Egalitarian or unequal, people are always least concerned about public affairs, aren’t they?c)The researchers only had data on top income shares from 24 countries, which means that it might not be possible to extrapolate the findings to other societies.d)They might be in a lower income level, but people from non-egalitarian countries know about their rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. Which of the following, if true, weakens the author’s conclusion about “attitude toward inequality”?a)The countries with better income equality provide people with better education and awareness, making them capable of questioning the norms of Income inequality.b)Egalitarian or unequal, people are always least concerned about public affairs, aren’t they?c)The researchers only had data on top income shares from 24 countries, which means that it might not be possible to extrapolate the findings to other societies.d)They might be in a lower income level, but people from non-egalitarian countries know about their rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. Which of the following, if true, weakens the author’s conclusion about “attitude toward inequality”?a)The countries with better income equality provide people with better education and awareness, making them capable of questioning the norms of Income inequality.b)Egalitarian or unequal, people are always least concerned about public affairs, aren’t they?c)The researchers only had data on top income shares from 24 countries, which means that it might not be possible to extrapolate the findings to other societies.d)They might be in a lower income level, but people from non-egalitarian countries know about their rights.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.