CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is no... Start Learning for Free
"Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”
Q. What role does the statement “the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being” plays to the statement “improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few”?
  • a)
    The role of Premise.
  • b)
    The role of Assumption.
  • c)
    The role of Inference.
  • d)
    The role of Conclusion.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
"Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Gre...
Since, the 1st statement is followed by the 2nd statement as a simplification and since it does not add any additional information to the 1st statement it forms a conclusion to the 2nd statement.
Free Test
Community Answer
"Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Gre...
Understanding the Relationship Between Income Inequality and Well-being
The statement "the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being" serves as a conclusion derived from the preceding observations about income inequality and individual happiness.
Key Points:
- Linking Concepts:
The conclusion connects the idea of societal inequality with personal well-being. It suggests that in environments where the income distribution is heavily skewed, achieving a higher income rank has a more significant impact on an individual’s happiness.
- Supporting Evidence:
The premise leading to this conclusion is the observation that improvements in income rank correlate with increased happiness particularly in societies with concentrated wealth. This indicates that relative position matters more in unequal societies.
- Implications of the Conclusion:
By identifying this relationship, it emphasizes that mere increases in personal income are not enough for happiness; rather, the context of income disparity plays a crucial role. This insight highlights the psychological impact of relative comparisons within socio-economic structures.
Conclusion's Importance
- Causal Understanding:
The conclusion encapsulates the essence of how societal structures influence individual experiences. It underlines the notion that emotional well-being is tied to social dynamics, particularly in unequal societies.
- Broader Societal Insights:
This conclusion can drive policy discussions around income inequality, suggesting that efforts to improve happiness should also focus on reducing inequality, as the relative position in an unequal society significantly affects life satisfaction.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

"Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. What role does the statement “the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being” plays to the statement “improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few”?a)The role of Premise.b)The role of Assumption.c)The role of Inference.d)The role of Conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
"Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. What role does the statement “the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being” plays to the statement “improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few”?a)The role of Premise.b)The role of Assumption.c)The role of Inference.d)The role of Conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. What role does the statement “the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being” plays to the statement “improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few”?a)The role of Premise.b)The role of Assumption.c)The role of Inference.d)The role of Conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. What role does the statement “the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being” plays to the statement “improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few”?a)The role of Premise.b)The role of Assumption.c)The role of Inference.d)The role of Conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. What role does the statement “the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being” plays to the statement “improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few”?a)The role of Premise.b)The role of Assumption.c)The role of Inference.d)The role of Conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. What role does the statement “the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being” plays to the statement “improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few”?a)The role of Premise.b)The role of Assumption.c)The role of Inference.d)The role of Conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. What role does the statement “the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being” plays to the statement “improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few”?a)The role of Premise.b)The role of Assumption.c)The role of Inference.d)The role of Conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. What role does the statement “the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being” plays to the statement “improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few”?a)The role of Premise.b)The role of Assumption.c)The role of Inference.d)The role of Conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. What role does the statement “the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being” plays to the statement “improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few”?a)The role of Premise.b)The role of Assumption.c)The role of Inference.d)The role of Conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice "Alan B. Krueger, first presented what is now widely known as the Great Gatsby Curve, which shows that the higher income inequality is in a society, the more difficult it is for a person to move outside the income class he or she was born into. The British epidemiologist Kate E. Pickett says outcomes such as mental and physical health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community, and child well-being are worse for the majority of people in countries where income inequality is high. Across societies, the richest 1% now hold a larger percentage of national income than ever before. What’s puzzling is that the latest research on attitudes toward inequality suggests that citizens in more unequal countries are less concerned about income inequality than those in more egalitarian countries. We also found that increasing an individual’s income only increased life satisfaction if their ranked position also improved. We also found that improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few. So, the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being.”Q. What role does the statement “the more unequal the society, the more moving up the income ladder contributed to someone’s overall well-being” plays to the statement “improvements in an individual’s income rank position bought more happiness in countries where top incomes were concentrated in the hands of a few”?a)The role of Premise.b)The role of Assumption.c)The role of Inference.d)The role of Conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev