CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Direction: In the question below is given a ... Start Learning for Free
Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered 1 and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
The private run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.
Conclusion:
I. The employees of this company seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.
II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.
  • a)
    Only conclusion I follows.
  • b)
    Only conclusion II follows.
  • c)
    Either I or II follows.
  • d)
    Neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two...
Conclusion I follow because if employees are resisting declaring their income and assets then the reason for this must be that they seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.
Conclusion II does not follow because nothing is mentioned about demands of employee union.
Hence, the correct option is (A).
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two...
Statement: The private run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.

Conclusion I: The employees of this company seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.
Conclusion II: The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.

Explanation:
To determine whether the conclusions logically follow from the given statement, we need to analyze the information provided.

Analyzing Conclusion I:
The statement mentions that the private run company has asked its employees to declare their income and assets. However, it has been strongly resisted by the employees' union, and no employee is going to declare his income. From this information, we can conclude that the employees are unwilling to disclose their income.

However, the conclusion states that the employees "seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary." This conclusion cannot be logically inferred from the given statement. The statement does not provide any information about the employees having undisclosed income. It only mentions their refusal to declare their income. Therefore, Conclusion I does not follow.

Analyzing Conclusion II:
The statement mentions that the employees' union has strongly resisted the company's request for income declaration. However, it does not provide any information about the union's demand for senior officers to declare their income first. This conclusion introduces new information that is not mentioned in the statement. Therefore, Conclusion II does not follow.

Conclusion:
Based on the analysis, neither Conclusion I nor Conclusion II logically follows from the given statement. However, the correct answer is mentioned as option 'A' which states that only Conclusion I follows. This answer is incorrect as Conclusion I does not logically follow from the given statement. The correct answer should be option 'D' - Neither I nor II follows.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered 1 and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The private run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.Conclusion:I. The employees of this company seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered 1 and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The private run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.Conclusion:I. The employees of this company seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered 1 and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The private run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.Conclusion:I. The employees of this company seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered 1 and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The private run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.Conclusion:I. The employees of this company seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered 1 and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The private run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.Conclusion:I. The employees of this company seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered 1 and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The private run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.Conclusion:I. The employees of this company seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered 1 and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The private run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.Conclusion:I. The employees of this company seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered 1 and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The private run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.Conclusion:I. The employees of this company seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered 1 and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The private run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.Conclusion:I. The employees of this company seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered 1 and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The private run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.Conclusion:I. The employees of this company seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Either I or II follows.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev