Question Description
Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A postman had come to Mr. B’s house he dropped letter on the gate but it flew and fell in Mr. B’s house. Mr. B’s servant came to A’s house to give the letter and went inside the house where he picked up some money while coming back when he was scolded and sent away by A.Decidea)Yes, he will be liable for trespass because he had no reasonable justification for it and he did commit a wrongful actb)No, because he had a reason to go that is to deliver the letterc)Yes, because B is vicariously liable.d)Yes, because he knew A would not like that some from B’s house came on their land.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A postman had come to Mr. B’s house he dropped letter on the gate but it flew and fell in Mr. B’s house. Mr. B’s servant came to A’s house to give the letter and went inside the house where he picked up some money while coming back when he was scolded and sent away by A.Decidea)Yes, he will be liable for trespass because he had no reasonable justification for it and he did commit a wrongful actb)No, because he had a reason to go that is to deliver the letterc)Yes, because B is vicariously liable.d)Yes, because he knew A would not like that some from B’s house came on their land.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A postman had come to Mr. B’s house he dropped letter on the gate but it flew and fell in Mr. B’s house. Mr. B’s servant came to A’s house to give the letter and went inside the house where he picked up some money while coming back when he was scolded and sent away by A.Decidea)Yes, he will be liable for trespass because he had no reasonable justification for it and he did commit a wrongful actb)No, because he had a reason to go that is to deliver the letterc)Yes, because B is vicariously liable.d)Yes, because he knew A would not like that some from B’s house came on their land.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A postman had come to Mr. B’s house he dropped letter on the gate but it flew and fell in Mr. B’s house. Mr. B’s servant came to A’s house to give the letter and went inside the house where he picked up some money while coming back when he was scolded and sent away by A.Decidea)Yes, he will be liable for trespass because he had no reasonable justification for it and he did commit a wrongful actb)No, because he had a reason to go that is to deliver the letterc)Yes, because B is vicariously liable.d)Yes, because he knew A would not like that some from B’s house came on their land.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A postman had come to Mr. B’s house he dropped letter on the gate but it flew and fell in Mr. B’s house. Mr. B’s servant came to A’s house to give the letter and went inside the house where he picked up some money while coming back when he was scolded and sent away by A.Decidea)Yes, he will be liable for trespass because he had no reasonable justification for it and he did commit a wrongful actb)No, because he had a reason to go that is to deliver the letterc)Yes, because B is vicariously liable.d)Yes, because he knew A would not like that some from B’s house came on their land.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A postman had come to Mr. B’s house he dropped letter on the gate but it flew and fell in Mr. B’s house. Mr. B’s servant came to A’s house to give the letter and went inside the house where he picked up some money while coming back when he was scolded and sent away by A.Decidea)Yes, he will be liable for trespass because he had no reasonable justification for it and he did commit a wrongful actb)No, because he had a reason to go that is to deliver the letterc)Yes, because B is vicariously liable.d)Yes, because he knew A would not like that some from B’s house came on their land.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A postman had come to Mr. B’s house he dropped letter on the gate but it flew and fell in Mr. B’s house. Mr. B’s servant came to A’s house to give the letter and went inside the house where he picked up some money while coming back when he was scolded and sent away by A.Decidea)Yes, he will be liable for trespass because he had no reasonable justification for it and he did commit a wrongful actb)No, because he had a reason to go that is to deliver the letterc)Yes, because B is vicariously liable.d)Yes, because he knew A would not like that some from B’s house came on their land.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A postman had come to Mr. B’s house he dropped letter on the gate but it flew and fell in Mr. B’s house. Mr. B’s servant came to A’s house to give the letter and went inside the house where he picked up some money while coming back when he was scolded and sent away by A.Decidea)Yes, he will be liable for trespass because he had no reasonable justification for it and he did commit a wrongful actb)No, because he had a reason to go that is to deliver the letterc)Yes, because B is vicariously liable.d)Yes, because he knew A would not like that some from B’s house came on their land.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A postman had come to Mr. B’s house he dropped letter on the gate but it flew and fell in Mr. B’s house. Mr. B’s servant came to A’s house to give the letter and went inside the house where he picked up some money while coming back when he was scolded and sent away by A.Decidea)Yes, he will be liable for trespass because he had no reasonable justification for it and he did commit a wrongful actb)No, because he had a reason to go that is to deliver the letterc)Yes, because B is vicariously liable.d)Yes, because he knew A would not like that some from B’s house came on their land.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.