Question Description
Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A, was an income tax officer and during the course of his service he had to enter B’s premises to search his house. B sued him for trespass. Decidea)Yes, because entering someone else’s premises without his permission is trespassb)No, because he was legally authorized to trespass the premisesc)No, he is his neighbor and such things are allowed in between neighborsd)Yes, because nothing is an excuse for trespass.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A, was an income tax officer and during the course of his service he had to enter B’s premises to search his house. B sued him for trespass. Decidea)Yes, because entering someone else’s premises without his permission is trespassb)No, because he was legally authorized to trespass the premisesc)No, he is his neighbor and such things are allowed in between neighborsd)Yes, because nothing is an excuse for trespass.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A, was an income tax officer and during the course of his service he had to enter B’s premises to search his house. B sued him for trespass. Decidea)Yes, because entering someone else’s premises without his permission is trespassb)No, because he was legally authorized to trespass the premisesc)No, he is his neighbor and such things are allowed in between neighborsd)Yes, because nothing is an excuse for trespass.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A, was an income tax officer and during the course of his service he had to enter B’s premises to search his house. B sued him for trespass. Decidea)Yes, because entering someone else’s premises without his permission is trespassb)No, because he was legally authorized to trespass the premisesc)No, he is his neighbor and such things are allowed in between neighborsd)Yes, because nothing is an excuse for trespass.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A, was an income tax officer and during the course of his service he had to enter B’s premises to search his house. B sued him for trespass. Decidea)Yes, because entering someone else’s premises without his permission is trespassb)No, because he was legally authorized to trespass the premisesc)No, he is his neighbor and such things are allowed in between neighborsd)Yes, because nothing is an excuse for trespass.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A, was an income tax officer and during the course of his service he had to enter B’s premises to search his house. B sued him for trespass. Decidea)Yes, because entering someone else’s premises without his permission is trespassb)No, because he was legally authorized to trespass the premisesc)No, he is his neighbor and such things are allowed in between neighborsd)Yes, because nothing is an excuse for trespass.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A, was an income tax officer and during the course of his service he had to enter B’s premises to search his house. B sued him for trespass. Decidea)Yes, because entering someone else’s premises without his permission is trespassb)No, because he was legally authorized to trespass the premisesc)No, he is his neighbor and such things are allowed in between neighborsd)Yes, because nothing is an excuse for trespass.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A, was an income tax officer and during the course of his service he had to enter B’s premises to search his house. B sued him for trespass. Decidea)Yes, because entering someone else’s premises without his permission is trespassb)No, because he was legally authorized to trespass the premisesc)No, he is his neighbor and such things are allowed in between neighborsd)Yes, because nothing is an excuse for trespass.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A, was an income tax officer and during the course of his service he had to enter B’s premises to search his house. B sued him for trespass. Decidea)Yes, because entering someone else’s premises without his permission is trespassb)No, because he was legally authorized to trespass the premisesc)No, he is his neighbor and such things are allowed in between neighborsd)Yes, because nothing is an excuse for trespass.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.