Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle I: Freedom of Speech is a fundamental right but it can be regulated in interest of public health and morality.Principle II: Reasonable restrictions can be placed on the fundamental rights in giving shape to the directive principles of state policy.Facts: The censor board has banned all commercials advertising alcoholic beverages from being aired on television. Is this a violation of the fundamental right of the manufacturers?a)An advertisement is not a speechb)A total ban is not a reasonable restriction on the freedom of speechc)The ban on commercials is in pursuance of a directive principle of stake policyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: In this section every question is...

Join the Discussion on the App

Principle I: Freedom of Speech is a fundamental right but it can be regulated in interest of public health and morality.

Principle II: Reasonable restrictions can be placed on the fundamental rights in giving shape to the directive principles of state policy.

Facts: The censor board has banned all commercials advertising alcoholic beverages from being aired on television. Is this a violation of the fundamental right of the manufacturers?

a)
An advertisement is not a speech
b)
A total ban is not a reasonable restriction on the freedom of speech
c)
The ban on commercials is in pursuance of a directive principle of stake policy
d)
None of the above

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Practice Test for AILET - 20

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and ...

The ban on commercials is in pursuance of a directive principle of stake policy

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Constitution of India guarantees to all its citizens certain fundamental freedoms, which are recognized as their fundamental rights. However, these fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of India are not absolute as no right can be. Each of these fundamental rights is liable to be controlled, curtailed and regulated to some extent by laws made by the Parliament or the State Legislatures. Accordingly, the Constitution of India lays down the grounds and the purposes for which a legislature can impose reasonable restrictions on the rights guaranteed to citizens. The State cannot travel beyond the contours of these reasonable restrictions in curbing the fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens. While determining the constitutional validity of a restriction imposed on a fundamental right by a legislation, the Court is not concerned with the necessity of the restriction or the wisdom of the policy underlying it, but only whether the restriction is in excess of the requirement, and whether the legislature has overstepped the Constitutional limitations. Two of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen of India are- the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and the right to reside and settle in any part of India. However, the State may impose reasonable restrictions on these rights by law, in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled tribes.Q.A group of Indian students of XYZ University located in New Delhi, India posted on social networking sites that they would hold a demonstration outside the university campus, protesting against a recently passed law which made it compulsory for university students to wear uniforms while attending classes. The students further threatened to use whatever means necessary to stop the oppression of students. Therefore, the State Authorities placed barricades around the university campus in order to restrict movement of the students carrying out the demonstration and ensuring that the demonstration does not turn violent. In the given situation, which of the following statements is correct regarding the act of placing of barricades by State Authorities?

View answer

The fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19(1) are not absolute. They are subject to restrictions placed in the subsequent clauses of Article19 according to the procedure established by law. No restrictions can be placed by mere executive or departmental instructions. However, these restrictions must be reasonable and not arbitrary. Each of these rights is liable to be controlled, curtailed and regulated to some extent by laws made by Parliament.Restrictions may be enacted “in the interests of” public order of the general public. A restriction can be said to be in the interest of public order only if the connection between the restriction and the public order is direct and proximate. Hence a restriction to be constitutionally valid must satisfy the following two tests:A legislation arbitrarily invading the right of a person cannot be regarded as reasonable. A restriction to be valid must have a direct and proximate nexus with the object which the legislation seeks to achieve and the restriction must not be in excess of that object i.e., a balance between the freedoms guaranteed under Art. 19(1)(

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Constitution of India guarantees to all its citizens certain fundamental freedoms, which are recognized as their fundamental rights. However, these fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of India are not absolute as no right can be. Each of these fundamental rights is liable to be controlled, curtailed and regulated to some extent by laws made by the Parliament or the State Legislatures. Accordingly, the Constitution of India lays down the grounds and the purposes for which a legislature can impose reasonable restrictions on the rights guaranteed to citizens. The State cannot travel beyond the contours of these reasonable restrictions in curbing the fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens. While determining the constitutional validity of a restriction imposed on a fundamental right by a legislation, the Court is not concerned with the necessity of the restriction or the wisdom of the policy underlying it, but only whether the restriction is in excess of the requirement, and whether the legislature has overstepped the Constitutional limitations. Two of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen of India are- the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and the right to reside and settle in any part of India. However, the State may impose reasonable restrictions on these rights by law, in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled tribes.Q. Mr. Z, a citizen of India, was issued a passport on June 1, 2020 by the Passport Office. Mr. Z was due to travel to Spain on July 15, 2021. On July 11, 2021, Mr. Z received a letter from the Regional Passport Officer intimating him that it was decided by the Government of India to seize his passport in public interest. Mr. Z was required to surrender his passport within seven days of the receipt of that letter. In the given situation, which of the following statements is correct?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Constitution of India guarantees to all its citizens certain fundamental freedoms, which are recognized as their fundamental rights. However, these fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of India are not absolute as no right can be. Each of these fundamental rights is liable to be controlled, curtailed and regulated to some extent by laws made by the Parliament or the State Legislatures. Accordingly, the Constitution of India lays down the grounds and the purposes for which a legislature can impose reasonable restrictions on the rights guaranteed to citizens. The State cannot travel beyond the contours of these reasonable restrictions in curbing the fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens. While determining the constitutional validity of a restriction imposed on a fundamental right by a legislation, the Court is not concerned with the necessity of the restriction or the wisdom of the policy underlying it, but only whether the restriction is in excess of the requirement, and whether the legislature has overstepped the Constitutional limitations. Two of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen of India are- the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and the right to reside and settle in any part of India. However, the State may impose reasonable restrictions on these rights by law, in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled tribes.Q.A law was enacted by the Parliament of India which consisted of a provision making it mandatory for every person riding a two-wheeler in India, to wear a helmet, failing which such person was made liable to a fine. Mr. X, a citizen of India, was fined for violation of the said provision. Mr. X challenged the constitutional validity of the said provision. In the given situation, which of the following statements is/are correct?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Constitution of India guarantees to all its citizens certain fundamental freedoms, which are recognized as their fundamental rights. However, these fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of India are not absolute as no right can be. Each of these fundamental rights is liable to be controlled, curtailed and regulated to some extent by laws made by the Parliament or the State Legislatures. Accordingly, the Constitution of India lays down the grounds and the purposes for which a legislature can impose reasonable restrictions on the rights guaranteed to citizens. The State cannot travel beyond the contours of these reasonable restrictions in curbing the fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens. While determining the constitutional validity of a restriction imposed on a fundamental right by a legislation, the Court is not concerned with the necessity of the restriction or the wisdom of the policy underlying it, but only whether the restriction is in excess of the requirement, and whether the legislature has overstepped the Constitutional limitations. Two of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen of India are- the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and the right to reside and settle in any part of India. However, the State may impose reasonable restrictions on these rights by law, in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled tribes.Q.The appropriate authority in a State passed an externment order against Mr. A, a citizen of India. The externment order prohibited Mr. A, from residing within the State, from the date specified in such order. The externment order was passed by virtue of powers conferred on the appropriate authority by law, and the constitutional validity of this law had been upheld by the Supreme Court of India. The externment order was passed on the ground that Mr. A was found to be frequently engaged in illegal business of narcotic drugs and was also involved in several cases of riot and criminal intimidation. In the given situation, which of the following statements is correct regarding the externment order?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle I: Freedom of Speech is a fundamental right but it can be regulated in interest of public health and morality.Principle II: Reasonable restrictions can be placed on the fundamental rights in giving shape to the directive principles of state policy.Facts: The censor board has banned all commercials advertising alcoholic beverages from being aired on television. Is this a violation of the fundamental right of the manufacturers?a)An advertisement is not a speechb)A total ban is not a reasonable restriction on the freedom of speechc)The ban on commercials is in pursuance of a directive principle of stake policyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle I: Freedom of Speech is a fundamental right but it can be regulated in interest of public health and morality.Principle II: Reasonable restrictions can be placed on the fundamental rights in giving shape to the directive principles of state policy.Facts: The censor board has banned all commercials advertising alcoholic beverages from being aired on television. Is this a violation of the fundamental right of the manufacturers?a)An advertisement is not a speechb)A total ban is not a reasonable restriction on the freedom of speechc)The ban on commercials is in pursuance of a directive principle of stake policyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle I: Freedom of Speech is a fundamental right but it can be regulated in interest of public health and morality.Principle II: Reasonable restrictions can be placed on the fundamental rights in giving shape to the directive principles of state policy.Facts: The censor board has banned all commercials advertising alcoholic beverages from being aired on television. Is this a violation of the fundamental right of the manufacturers?a)An advertisement is not a speechb)A total ban is not a reasonable restriction on the freedom of speechc)The ban on commercials is in pursuance of a directive principle of stake policyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle I: Freedom of Speech is a fundamental right but it can be regulated in interest of public health and morality.Principle II: Reasonable restrictions can be placed on the fundamental rights in giving shape to the directive principles of state policy.Facts: The censor board has banned all commercials advertising alcoholic beverages from being aired on television. Is this a violation of the fundamental right of the manufacturers?a)An advertisement is not a speechb)A total ban is not a reasonable restriction on the freedom of speechc)The ban on commercials is in pursuance of a directive principle of stake policyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle I: Freedom of Speech is a fundamental right but it can be regulated in interest of public health and morality.Principle II: Reasonable restrictions can be placed on the fundamental rights in giving shape to the directive principles of state policy.Facts: The censor board has banned all commercials advertising alcoholic beverages from being aired on television. Is this a violation of the fundamental right of the manufacturers?a)An advertisement is not a speechb)A total ban is not a reasonable restriction on the freedom of speechc)The ban on commercials is in pursuance of a directive principle of stake policyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle I: Freedom of Speech is a fundamental right but it can be regulated in interest of public health and morality.Principle II: Reasonable restrictions can be placed on the fundamental rights in giving shape to the directive principles of state policy.Facts: The censor board has banned all commercials advertising alcoholic beverages from being aired on television. Is this a violation of the fundamental right of the manufacturers?a)An advertisement is not a speechb)A total ban is not a reasonable restriction on the freedom of speechc)The ban on commercials is in pursuance of a directive principle of stake policyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle I: Freedom of Speech is a fundamental right but it can be regulated in interest of public health and morality.Principle II: Reasonable restrictions can be placed on the fundamental rights in giving shape to the directive principles of state policy.Facts: The censor board has banned all commercials advertising alcoholic beverages from being aired on television. Is this a violation of the fundamental right of the manufacturers?a)An advertisement is not a speechb)A total ban is not a reasonable restriction on the freedom of speechc)The ban on commercials is in pursuance of a directive principle of stake policyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle I: Freedom of Speech is a fundamental right but it can be regulated in interest of public health and morality.Principle II: Reasonable restrictions can be placed on the fundamental rights in giving shape to the directive principles of state policy.Facts: The censor board has banned all commercials advertising alcoholic beverages from being aired on television. Is this a violation of the fundamental right of the manufacturers?a)An advertisement is not a speechb)A total ban is not a reasonable restriction on the freedom of speechc)The ban on commercials is in pursuance of a directive principle of stake policyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle I: Freedom of Speech is a fundamental right but it can be regulated in interest of public health and morality.Principle II: Reasonable restrictions can be placed on the fundamental rights in giving shape to the directive principles of state policy.Facts: The censor board has banned all commercials advertising alcoholic beverages from being aired on television. Is this a violation of the fundamental right of the manufacturers?a)An advertisement is not a speechb)A total ban is not a reasonable restriction on the freedom of speechc)The ban on commercials is in pursuance of a directive principle of stake policyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle I: Freedom of Speech is a fundamental right but it can be regulated in interest of public health and morality.Principle II: Reasonable restrictions can be placed on the fundamental rights in giving shape to the directive principles of state policy.Facts: The censor board has banned all commercials advertising alcoholic beverages from being aired on television. Is this a violation of the fundamental right of the manufacturers?a)An advertisement is not a speechb)A total ban is not a reasonable restriction on the freedom of speechc)The ban on commercials is in pursuance of a directive principle of stake policyd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam