CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdic...
Start Learning for Free
Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.
Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.
Decide.
- a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.
- b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.
- c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Ra...
The agreement between the party clearly confers jurisdiction to the courts of Delhi. The principle only declares void those agreements which bar the jurisdiction of any court. This agreement only identified the jurisdiction of Delhi courts by mutual consent and was not an agreement to preclude the jurisdiction of any other court.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Ra...
Explanation:
Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.
Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement specifying Delhi courts for dispute resolution.
Analysis:
- The principle states that no agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.
- In this case, the agreement between Rakesh and Sushil specifies that any dispute shall be brought before the courts of Delhi.
- However, this does not mean that Sushil is barred from filing a suit in the courts of Bombay.
- The agreement merely identifies the place of dispute resolution and does not restrict Sushil from approaching the courts of Bombay.
- Therefore, Sushil is not bound by the agreement to only file a suit in Delhi courts.
Conclusion: The agreement between Rakesh and Sushil does not bar Sushil from filing a suit in the courts of Bombay. Hence, Sushil can file a suit in the Bombay courts despite the agreement specifying Delhi courts for dispute resolution.
Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.
Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement specifying Delhi courts for dispute resolution.
Analysis:
- The principle states that no agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.
- In this case, the agreement between Rakesh and Sushil specifies that any dispute shall be brought before the courts of Delhi.
- However, this does not mean that Sushil is barred from filing a suit in the courts of Bombay.
- The agreement merely identifies the place of dispute resolution and does not restrict Sushil from approaching the courts of Bombay.
- Therefore, Sushil is not bound by the agreement to only file a suit in Delhi courts.
Conclusion: The agreement between Rakesh and Sushil does not bar Sushil from filing a suit in the courts of Bombay. Hence, Sushil can file a suit in the Bombay courts despite the agreement specifying Delhi courts for dispute resolution.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Similar CLAT Doubts
Top Courses for CLATView all
Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.Decide.a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.Decide.a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.Decide.a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.Decide.a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.Decide.a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.Decide.a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.Decide.a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.Decide.a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.Decide.a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.Decide.a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.Decide.a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.Decide.a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principle: No agreement can bar the jurisdiction of a court.Facts: Rakesh and Sushil enter into an agreement whereby they agree that in case of any dispute, the same shall only be brought before the courts of Delhi. A few weeks later a dispute arose between the two and Sushil who resides in Bombay wants to file a suit in the courts of Bombay.Decide.a)No, he cannot file a suit as the agreement specifies the place of dispute resolution as Delhi.b)Yes, as the agreement is void as it bars the jurisdiction of Mumbai High Court.c)No. The agreement is not void as it does not bar the jurisdiction of any court rather it identifies the place of dispute resolution.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup