Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: In the following question a stat...

Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:

Statements:

The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.

Conclusions:

I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.

II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.

a)
Only conclusion I follows
b)
Only conclusion II follows
c)
Either I or II follows
d)
Both I and II follow

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed ...

According to the statement, the Government has spoiled financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors. This means that only those persons should be appointed as Directors who are experts in finance and are acquainted with the financial work of the institute. So, both I and II follow.

Hence, the correct option is (D).

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed ...

Statement: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.

Conclusion I: Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.
Conclusion II: The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.

Both Conclusion I and Conclusion II follow.

Explanation:

The statement suggests that the government's appointment of bureaucrats as Directors of financial institutions has resulted in the deterioration of these institutions. Based on this statement, we can evaluate the given conclusions:

Conclusion I: Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.
This conclusion is valid because the statement highlights that the government's appointments of bureaucrats have led to the spoiling of financial institutions. To avoid such deterioration, it is logical to conclude that the government should consider appointing individuals with expertise in the area of finance as Directors of these institutions. This will ensure that the appointed individuals possess the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively manage and make informed decisions regarding financial matters.

Conclusion II: The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.
This conclusion also follows from the given statement. If the government has spoiled top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors, it implies that the Directors lacked the necessary expertise in finance. To prevent similar situations in the future, it is reasonable to conclude that the Directors of financial institutions should have expertise that matches the financial work carried out by the institute. This will enable them to understand and address the complex financial challenges faced by the institution and make appropriate decisions to ensure its success.

Therefore, both Conclusion I and Conclusion II are valid in light of the given statement. The government should consider appointing Directors of financial institutions based on their expertise in finance to avoid the deterioration of these institutions. Additionally, the Directors should possess knowledge and skills commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute to effectively manage and address financial challenges.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.

View answer

Most large corporations in the United States were once run by individual capitalists who owned enough stock to dominate the board of directors and dictate company policy. Because putting such large amounts of stock on the market would only depress its value, they could not sell out for a quick profit and instead had to concentrate on improving the long-term productivity of their companies. Today, with few exceptions, the stock of large United States corporations is held by large institutions—pension funds, for example—and because these institutions are prohibited by antitrust laws from owning a majority of a company’s stock and from actively influencing a company’s decision-making, they can enhance their wealth only by buying and selling stock in anticipation of fluctuations in its value. A minority shareholder is necessarily a short term trader. As a result, United States productivity is unlikely to improve unless shareholders and the managers of the companies in which they invest are encouraged to enhance long-term productivity (and hence long-term profitability), rather than simply to maximize short-term profits.Since the return of the old-style capitalist is unlikely, today’s short-term traders must be remade into tomorrow’s long-term capitalistic investors. The legal limits that now prevent financial institutions from acquiring a dominant shareholding position in a corporation should be removed, and such institutions should be encouraged to take a more active role in the operations of the companies in which they invest. In addition, any institution that holds twenty percent or more of a company’s stock should be forced to give the public one day’s notice of the intent to sell those shares. Unless the announced sale could be explained to the public on grounds other than anticipated future losses, the value of the stock would plummet and, like the old-time capitalists, major investors could cut their losses only by helping to restore their companies’ productivity. Such measures would force financial institutions to become capitalists whose success depends not on trading shares at the propitious moment, but on increasing the productivity of the companies in which they invest.Q. According to the passage, the purpose of the requirement suggested in lines "In addition, any institution that holds twenty percent or more of a company’s stock should be forced to give the public one day’s notice of the intent to sell those shares." would be which of the following?

View answer

The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Article 30 says "All minorities shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice." The protection granted to Minority Educational Institutions to admit students of their choice is subject to reasonable restrictions. Holy Mary Institute, an educational minority institution was granted the status of "Christian Minority Educational Institution". Recently, Holy Land Govt. made a law mandating the Secondary School Certificates or Transfer Certificates (T.C.) from the school from which they have studied shall be the basis for the purpose of determining the minority status of candidates. Holy Mary Institute challenged the law on the ground that is an intrusion on the right to administer the minority institutions conferred by Article 30(1). Based on the principle of law and information set out in the given passage, choose the most appropriate choice

View answer

Direction: You have been given some passages followd by questions based on each passage. You are required to choose the mot appropriate option which follows from the passage. Only the information given in the passage should be used for choosing the answer and no external knowledge of law howsoever prominent is to be applied.The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C.Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus: The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State.Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. Itis a positive of equal treatment of all religious. TheState has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another.Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Article 30 says "All minoritiesshall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice." The protection granted to Minority Educational Institutions to admit students of their choice is subject to reasonable restrictions. Holy Mary Institute, an educational minority institution was granted the status of "Christian Minority Educational Institution". Recently, Holy Land Govt. made a law mandating the Secondary School Certificates or Transfer Certificates (T.C.) from the school from which they have studied shall be the basis for the purpose of determining the minority status of candidates. Holy Mary Institute challenged the law on the ground that is an intrusion on the right to administer the minority institutions conferred by Article 30(1). Based on the principle of law and information set out in the given passage, choose the most appropriate choice

View answer

The makers of our Constitution designed the institutions of our republic with great care and attention to detail. The deliberations of the Constituent Assembly bear witness to the extraordinary quality of thought which went into the making of these institutions. They were designed to endure and it was expected that as the republic grew, a body of good practices, conventions and intangible legacies would nourish and sustain them and make them stronger.Instead, we have seen every party in power since Indira Gandhi try to weaken and diminish these institutions. The Parliament, the Supreme Court, the Chief Election Commissioner, the Comptroller & Auditor General, the Union Public Service Commission are among the long list of institutions wherein constant attempts have been made to subdue them, erode their autonomy and authority (sometimes in the guise of reform) and have them subordinated to the will of the political executive, particularly the Prime Minister’s Office. Yet, their structural strength has enabled them to resist these attacks and substantially retain their character although each of them is probably weaker than before.The one institution that has received the maximum battering from every quarter is that of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS). In the sixty four years of its existence (it came into existence in 1951 by an Act of Parliament under Article 312 of the Constitution), there have been more than fifty Commissions, Committees, Task Forces etc that have questioned and investigated different aspects of its architecture, tinkered with the recruitment system, and re-engineered it to change the socio-cultural and age profile of the entrants, introduced an OBC quota in addition to the original one for SC and ST, and suggested several other ‘reforms’ which have substantially changed its character.Some changes have been necessitated by major sociological and political developments, for instance, the acceptance of the recommendations of the Mandal Commission. Some others have been motivated by the desire to make the IAS politically and culturally more acceptable. Yet despite these changes in the original architecture — or maybe because of them — the institution remains central to the working of the Government and, in the minds of the public, still exercises disproportionate power in the scheme of things.Q.Which of the following views can be attributed to the author of the above passage?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam