CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: In the following question a stat...
Start Learning for Free
Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:
Statements:
The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.
Conclusions:
I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.
II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.
- a)Only conclusion I follows
- b)Only conclusion II follows
- c)Either I or II follows
- d)Both I and II follow
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed ...
According to the statement, the Government has spoiled financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors. This means that only those persons should be appointed as Directors who are experts in finance and are acquainted with the financial work of the institute. So, both I and II follow.
View all questions of this test
Hence, the correct option is (D).
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed ...
Statement: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.
Conclusion I: Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.
Conclusion II: The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.
Both Conclusion I and Conclusion II follow.
Explanation:
The statement suggests that the government's appointment of bureaucrats as Directors of financial institutions has resulted in the deterioration of these institutions. Based on this statement, we can evaluate the given conclusions:
Conclusion I: Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.
This conclusion is valid because the statement highlights that the government's appointments of bureaucrats have led to the spoiling of financial institutions. To avoid such deterioration, it is logical to conclude that the government should consider appointing individuals with expertise in the area of finance as Directors of these institutions. This will ensure that the appointed individuals possess the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively manage and make informed decisions regarding financial matters.
Conclusion II: The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.
This conclusion also follows from the given statement. If the government has spoiled top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors, it implies that the Directors lacked the necessary expertise in finance. To prevent similar situations in the future, it is reasonable to conclude that the Directors of financial institutions should have expertise that matches the financial work carried out by the institute. This will enable them to understand and address the complex financial challenges faced by the institution and make appropriate decisions to ensure its success.
Therefore, both Conclusion I and Conclusion II are valid in light of the given statement. The government should consider appointing Directors of financial institutions based on their expertise in finance to avoid the deterioration of these institutions. Additionally, the Directors should possess knowledge and skills commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute to effectively manage and address financial challenges.
Conclusion I: Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.
Conclusion II: The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.
Both Conclusion I and Conclusion II follow.
Explanation:
The statement suggests that the government's appointment of bureaucrats as Directors of financial institutions has resulted in the deterioration of these institutions. Based on this statement, we can evaluate the given conclusions:
Conclusion I: Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.
This conclusion is valid because the statement highlights that the government's appointments of bureaucrats have led to the spoiling of financial institutions. To avoid such deterioration, it is logical to conclude that the government should consider appointing individuals with expertise in the area of finance as Directors of these institutions. This will ensure that the appointed individuals possess the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively manage and make informed decisions regarding financial matters.
Conclusion II: The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.
This conclusion also follows from the given statement. If the government has spoiled top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors, it implies that the Directors lacked the necessary expertise in finance. To prevent similar situations in the future, it is reasonable to conclude that the Directors of financial institutions should have expertise that matches the financial work carried out by the institute. This will enable them to understand and address the complex financial challenges faced by the institution and make appropriate decisions to ensure its success.
Therefore, both Conclusion I and Conclusion II are valid in light of the given statement. The government should consider appointing Directors of financial institutions based on their expertise in finance to avoid the deterioration of these institutions. Additionally, the Directors should possess knowledge and skills commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute to effectively manage and address financial challenges.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.a)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either I or II followsd)Both I and II followCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup