Question Description
"In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.What can be inferred from the author’s statement about “broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies”?a)The people in a broader set of groups are not smart and intelligent.b)In a broader set of groups, more than language, your skills are a mark of your intelligence.c)The broader group usually has too many unintelligent people in it, hence the language they speak is also unintelligent.d)Language and dialects are subject to many harms of adulteration by other languages, they should be preserved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.What can be inferred from the author’s statement about “broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies”?a)The people in a broader set of groups are not smart and intelligent.b)In a broader set of groups, more than language, your skills are a mark of your intelligence.c)The broader group usually has too many unintelligent people in it, hence the language they speak is also unintelligent.d)Language and dialects are subject to many harms of adulteration by other languages, they should be preserved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.What can be inferred from the author’s statement about “broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies”?a)The people in a broader set of groups are not smart and intelligent.b)In a broader set of groups, more than language, your skills are a mark of your intelligence.c)The broader group usually has too many unintelligent people in it, hence the language they speak is also unintelligent.d)Language and dialects are subject to many harms of adulteration by other languages, they should be preserved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.What can be inferred from the author’s statement about “broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies”?a)The people in a broader set of groups are not smart and intelligent.b)In a broader set of groups, more than language, your skills are a mark of your intelligence.c)The broader group usually has too many unintelligent people in it, hence the language they speak is also unintelligent.d)Language and dialects are subject to many harms of adulteration by other languages, they should be preserved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.What can be inferred from the author’s statement about “broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies”?a)The people in a broader set of groups are not smart and intelligent.b)In a broader set of groups, more than language, your skills are a mark of your intelligence.c)The broader group usually has too many unintelligent people in it, hence the language they speak is also unintelligent.d)Language and dialects are subject to many harms of adulteration by other languages, they should be preserved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.What can be inferred from the author’s statement about “broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies”?a)The people in a broader set of groups are not smart and intelligent.b)In a broader set of groups, more than language, your skills are a mark of your intelligence.c)The broader group usually has too many unintelligent people in it, hence the language they speak is also unintelligent.d)Language and dialects are subject to many harms of adulteration by other languages, they should be preserved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.What can be inferred from the author’s statement about “broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies”?a)The people in a broader set of groups are not smart and intelligent.b)In a broader set of groups, more than language, your skills are a mark of your intelligence.c)The broader group usually has too many unintelligent people in it, hence the language they speak is also unintelligent.d)Language and dialects are subject to many harms of adulteration by other languages, they should be preserved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.What can be inferred from the author’s statement about “broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies”?a)The people in a broader set of groups are not smart and intelligent.b)In a broader set of groups, more than language, your skills are a mark of your intelligence.c)The broader group usually has too many unintelligent people in it, hence the language they speak is also unintelligent.d)Language and dialects are subject to many harms of adulteration by other languages, they should be preserved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.What can be inferred from the author’s statement about “broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies”?a)The people in a broader set of groups are not smart and intelligent.b)In a broader set of groups, more than language, your skills are a mark of your intelligence.c)The broader group usually has too many unintelligent people in it, hence the language they speak is also unintelligent.d)Language and dialects are subject to many harms of adulteration by other languages, they should be preserved.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.