"In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Which of the following statements, forms the Conclusion of the author’s argument about the definition of Intelligence?a)A person can be intelligent and yet not be good in English.b)Being good in English means you are not intelligent.c)Being Intelligent means being good in English.d)A person can be good in English or Intelligent, not both.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > "In India, speaking fluently in English is c...

How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.

Which of the following statements, forms the Conclusion of the author’s argument about the definition of Intelligence?

a)
A person can be intelligent and yet not be good in English.
b)
Being good in English means you are not intelligent.
c)
Being Intelligent means being good in English.
d)
A person can be good in English or Intelligent, not both.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

"In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the s...

The author’s argument is that being good in English itself does not mean that the person is intelligent or vice versa.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

"In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.What can be inferred from the author’s statement about “broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies”?

View answer

"In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Which of the following pieces of information, if introduced in the passage, will weaken the author’s comparison of French and Hindi?

View answer

"In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Which of the following cannot be said to be likely followed in a Grammar Nazi scheme of operation?

View answer

"In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Relying on the strength of the arguments presented by the author in the passage, which of the following examples cannot be said to be extrapolating the same logic?

View answer

[1]Studies of brain evolution are compelling because of their implications for understanding human evolution. [2]Consequently, researchers are motivated by a desire to find the causes of intelligence. [3]What is intelligence? [4]It is inevitably described with respect to human attributes; we consider ourselves intelligent, and we therefore compare other species to ourselves. [5]This view is legitimized by the fact that humans do have very sophisticated brains, exhibit extraordinarily complex behavior, and cope well in novel situations, generalizing from one problem to another.[6]Unfortunately, criteria applicable to humans are not necessarily appropriate for evaluating traits of other organisms. [7]There is no basis for the assumption that all intelligence is human-like intelligence, nor even for the preconception that all primate intelligence is human-like. [8]To say that intellectual prowess is comparative across species and to use humans as the basis for comparison is a continuation of pre-Darwinian ideas of a scala naturae dealing with intelligence. [9]If ranking species in a single phylogenetic line according to criteria based on the extant member is questionable, then certainly since ecological conditions and selection pressures change over time, ranking contemporary species separated by millions of years of evolution based on the traits exhibited by one is unjustifiable. [10]To assume a continuum of intelligence across today's species is incompatible with an evolutionary perspective, and this preconception must not be allowed to guide studies of brain evolution. [11]The information-processing systems of different animals have been designed to respond to different stimuli, diverse ""cognitive substrates,"" and therefore expectations of an interspecific regularity between these IPS and various other body measures are ill-conceived.[12]What # lacking # a good definition # intelligence that will allow us # say something # how an animal copes # its own ecology and not how closely # approximates human behavior. [13]There are undeniable trends in the history of life -- towards larger brains in mammals and larger neocortices in primates -- but to generalize correlations of these trends into a concept of intelligence should not be attempted until an accurate definition is developed. [14]Until that time, the most that comparative brain size studies can do is demonstrate correlations and thereby pose questions for scientists who focus on the evolution of species with one of these correlated characteristics.Q. The initial definition of ‘Intelligence’ is given with respect to Humans. This is considered acceptable to some because?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

"In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Which of the following statements, forms the Conclusion of the author’s argument about the definition of Intelligence?a)A person can be intelligent and yet not be good in English.b)Being good in English means you are not intelligent.c)Being Intelligent means being good in English.d)A person can be good in English or Intelligent, not both.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
"In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Which of the following statements, forms the Conclusion of the author’s argument about the definition of Intelligence?a)A person can be intelligent and yet not be good in English.b)Being good in English means you are not intelligent.c)Being Intelligent means being good in English.d)A person can be good in English or Intelligent, not both.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Which of the following statements, forms the Conclusion of the author’s argument about the definition of Intelligence?a)A person can be intelligent and yet not be good in English.b)Being good in English means you are not intelligent.c)Being Intelligent means being good in English.d)A person can be good in English or Intelligent, not both.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Which of the following statements, forms the Conclusion of the author’s argument about the definition of Intelligence?a)A person can be intelligent and yet not be good in English.b)Being good in English means you are not intelligent.c)Being Intelligent means being good in English.d)A person can be good in English or Intelligent, not both.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Which of the following statements, forms the Conclusion of the author’s argument about the definition of Intelligence?a)A person can be intelligent and yet not be good in English.b)Being good in English means you are not intelligent.c)Being Intelligent means being good in English.d)A person can be good in English or Intelligent, not both.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Which of the following statements, forms the Conclusion of the author’s argument about the definition of Intelligence?a)A person can be intelligent and yet not be good in English.b)Being good in English means you are not intelligent.c)Being Intelligent means being good in English.d)A person can be good in English or Intelligent, not both.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Which of the following statements, forms the Conclusion of the author’s argument about the definition of Intelligence?a)A person can be intelligent and yet not be good in English.b)Being good in English means you are not intelligent.c)Being Intelligent means being good in English.d)A person can be good in English or Intelligent, not both.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Which of the following statements, forms the Conclusion of the author’s argument about the definition of Intelligence?a)A person can be intelligent and yet not be good in English.b)Being good in English means you are not intelligent.c)Being Intelligent means being good in English.d)A person can be good in English or Intelligent, not both.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Which of the following statements, forms the Conclusion of the author’s argument about the definition of Intelligence?a)A person can be intelligent and yet not be good in English.b)Being good in English means you are not intelligent.c)Being Intelligent means being good in English.d)A person can be good in English or Intelligent, not both.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice "In India, speaking fluently in English is considered a sign of the smart and intelligent individual. When you expose yourself to a broader set of the group occupied in intellectual studies or pursuing a unique art form, then a language is of no importance. For years, the grammar Nazis have judged people based on their English vocabulary. Many times, we come across smart people, extremely talented in subjects like Math, and we are awestruck. Although, their English may have been weak but does that allow us to categorize them as non-intelligent or dumb?How quickly a person’s brain grasps and exercises, displays the “intelligence” of the individual. I do not deny the fact that verbal-linguistics is a measurable factor of intelligence, but that does not imply that the person has to be excellent in the English language. Learning the language is entirely another matter of discussion. Most people are expert in the language because of few basic reasons; part of their upbringing, strict English medium school, love for English literature and the rest of the people master the dialect only to get a reasonable job in the society. So, ideally, anyone working or communicating in Hindi is not a concern or reason for criticizing them; instead, it is a matter of pride. Let’s not forget how the French defend their language! And for all those competent English speakers, accept non-English individuals with the same respect because they know things which you don’t know too. And you never know, the person you ridiculed yesterday may turn into the biggest superstar someday.Which of the following statements, forms the Conclusion of the author’s argument about the definition of Intelligence?a)A person can be intelligent and yet not be good in English.b)Being good in English means you are not intelligent.c)Being Intelligent means being good in English.d)A person can be good in English or Intelligent, not both.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam