CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: In making a decision about an imp...
Start Learning for Free
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement: Should there be only two political parties in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.
II. No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.
- a)if only argument I is strong
- b)if only argument II is strong.
- c)if either argument I or II is strong.
- d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.
- e)if both arguments I and II are strong
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is de...
The correct option is D
If neither I nor II is strong
Argument I is weak as it is an argument by example. Argument II is weak. In fact, it is mature having such a criteria, lesser maturity would be required when the choice is limited.
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is de...
Understanding the Arguments
When evaluating the arguments regarding whether there should be only two political parties in India, it's essential to analyze the strength of each argument presented.
Argument I: Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.
- This argument suggests that the presence of two political parties is a standard in developed nations.
- However, it fails to consider the unique socio-political context of India.
- Just because a system works in some countries does not mean it will work effectively in another.
- Therefore, this argument is weak as it lacks a tailored rationale for India’s situation.
Argument II: No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.
- This argument posits that the Indian electorate may not have the maturity required to choose between only two options effectively.
- While it raises a crucial point regarding the political awareness and engagement of the electorate, it also lacks constructive evidence.
- It does not provide clarity on what "maturity" means or how it directly impacts the choice between two parties.
- Thus, it is also a weak argument.
Conclusion: Analysis of Strength
- Both arguments presented do not adequately support their claims.
- Argument I does not consider India's unique political landscape, and Argument II does not substantiate its assertion about the electorate's maturity.
- Hence, the correct answer is option **D**: neither argument I nor II is strong.
This evaluation illustrates that both arguments lack the necessary depth and relevance to be considered strong in the context of the question posed.
When evaluating the arguments regarding whether there should be only two political parties in India, it's essential to analyze the strength of each argument presented.
Argument I: Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.
- This argument suggests that the presence of two political parties is a standard in developed nations.
- However, it fails to consider the unique socio-political context of India.
- Just because a system works in some countries does not mean it will work effectively in another.
- Therefore, this argument is weak as it lacks a tailored rationale for India’s situation.
Argument II: No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.
- This argument posits that the Indian electorate may not have the maturity required to choose between only two options effectively.
- While it raises a crucial point regarding the political awareness and engagement of the electorate, it also lacks constructive evidence.
- It does not provide clarity on what "maturity" means or how it directly impacts the choice between two parties.
- Thus, it is also a weak argument.
Conclusion: Analysis of Strength
- Both arguments presented do not adequately support their claims.
- Argument I does not consider India's unique political landscape, and Argument II does not substantiate its assertion about the electorate's maturity.
- Hence, the correct answer is option **D**: neither argument I nor II is strong.
This evaluation illustrates that both arguments lack the necessary depth and relevance to be considered strong in the context of the question posed.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Question Description
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be only two political parties in India?Arguments:I. Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.II. No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be only two political parties in India?Arguments:I. Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.II. No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be only two political parties in India?Arguments:I. Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.II. No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be only two political parties in India?Arguments:I. Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.II. No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be only two political parties in India?Arguments:I. Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.II. No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be only two political parties in India?Arguments:I. Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.II. No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be only two political parties in India?Arguments:I. Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.II. No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be only two political parties in India?Arguments:I. Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.II. No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be only two political parties in India?Arguments:I. Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.II. No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be only two political parties in India?Arguments:I. Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.II. No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be only two political parties in India?Arguments:I. Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.II. No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Directions: In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a strong argument and a weak argument. A strong argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A weak argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is strong and which is weak.Statement: Should there be only two political parties in India?Arguments:I. Yes, in many developed countries there are only two political parties.II. No, Indian electorate is not mature to select between only two political parties.a)if only argument I is strongb)if only argument II is strong.c)if either argument I or II is strong.d)if neither argument I nor II is strong.e)if both arguments I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup